tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7572739179315002435.post3850738503712554071..comments2023-11-03T06:57:29.839-04:00Comments on Freeper Madness: Obstruction is the best revengeUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7572739179315002435.post-76957600049189502632016-02-24T07:42:08.039-05:002016-02-24T07:42:08.039-05:00Exactly. They can just shoot whatever they can'...Exactly. They can just shoot whatever they can't pray away.anonymousBnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7572739179315002435.post-61374009463032118232016-02-24T01:04:36.348-05:002016-02-24T01:04:36.348-05:00The "3G" theory omits two other crucial ...The "3G" theory omits two other crucial issues. Freepers would be lost without fear and loathing of "Ferals" and "ILLEGALS". Then again, they probably think that liberal application of the second G deals with that.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7572739179315002435.post-36043789595052951872016-02-23T18:16:48.228-05:002016-02-23T18:16:48.228-05:00The only issue of concern is the nominee’s support...<i>The only issue of concern is the nominee’s support of the individual right to bear arms.</i><br /><br />This is why Freepers are increasingly marginal and irrelevant, why they keep losing power and influence and elections and feeling frustrated. Most of them have only three concerns: God, guns, and gays. They figure if they can have these three things, everything else will take care of itself. They're not interested much in any other issues. This is what they refer to as "reality." The trouble is, that's no way to run a country, especially a superpower as large as ours is. And their three Gs are largely a matter of personal preference, and nothing more. <br /><br />I think they are hoping for a world in which Trump makes their reality everyone's reality. Even if it has to be at gunpoint.anonymousBnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7572739179315002435.post-17613372948466430452016-02-23T15:06:34.617-05:002016-02-23T15:06:34.617-05:00They mean "maintain the ideological balance&q...They mean "maintain the ideological balance" as it was in the days of muskets, buggy whips and hats with belt buckles on them. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7572739179315002435.post-54132460475103625322016-02-23T12:42:01.001-05:002016-02-23T12:42:01.001-05:00ay-nony-nony predicts ! ...
Mitch McConnell will ...ay-nony-nony predicts ! ...<br /><br />Mitch McConnell will fold and at least hold hearings, at least further into the primary season when it becomes more apparent the republicans are in total dysfunction heading into the convention.<br /><br />Obama will at least give him some cover by nominating a somewhat moderate judge that has at least a few conservative rulings on his/her side.ay-nony-nonynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7572739179315002435.post-70712901913460600332016-02-23T12:06:02.800-05:002016-02-23T12:06:02.800-05:00So, if "maintaining the ideological makeup&qu...So, if "maintaining the ideological makeup" of SCOTUS is the important thing, I assume that if they win the white house, they will either leave the seat open or put a liberal judge in to replace Justice Ginsburg, if her spot comes open later?AMJhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03680278328781022682noreply@blogger.com