Hitchens v. Palin

Can you guess which conservative Freepers rally behind?

2ndDivisionVet knows what it means to disagree with Our Sarah:

Are all homosexuals this bitter and misogynistic?

MrB is off the wall as always:

You have to understand that “secessionism” is the WORST “ism” ever to exist, as far as an elitist leftist is concerned.

Secession trumps all their control fantasies.

Hitchens calls her campaign one of “populism”, when in reality, it is simply anti-elitist. No one has the ability, the right, and especially not the duty to make our individual decisions for us.

Because there is no way being anti-elitist is populist at all!

wac3rd also has something random to say for no reason:

The Liberal loves Mao but hates Reagan.

They are clinically insane and should be treated as such.

For the record, the original article mentions Nixon, but says nary a word on Regan or Mao.

Nosterrex has the poop on Hitchens:

Hitchens is a very vocal Atheist, and he may be bi-sexual, but he is married. One of the reasons that he hates the idea of god is that it limits his sexual activities. I would have been shocked if Hitchens had anything good to say about Palin. Hitchens used to be a member of the socialist party in England. Nothing is more offensive to Hitchens than a religious conservative.

Scotsman will be Free hates whatever Sarah hates:

Oooooh no! A “secessionist”. What a horrible person. Didn’t like Hawaii. Jumping jimminy, what a travesty. I didn’t like it either. It’s filled with caucasian hating racists who happen to be of asian descent.

Damn whitey-hating Asians of Hawaii!