Monday potpourri.

FrankR knows what Obama taught at Harvard Law:

I think all he really taught was "Alinsky" and how to use "Rules for Radicals" to subvert the Constitution.

But "Radicals" best describes what is in power now, and they are governing just like the 70's, anti-government hippies they were then.

Some people only read the rule book to find ways to break the rules.

JudgemAll on why liberals are make fun of the Republican sex scandles:

The fact is we are not throwing money at their ugly gay whores, and that is the only reason they are mad: their pimping program loses money to tastier stuff which loves women and their children.

JudgemAll again, on Obama's passover:

He is not embracing the seder, he is sodomizing it of his own self pomp and stink.

joe fonebone on Obama's secret Court stacking plan:

OK........here’s the deal....fubo is a flaming commie, but he is not stupid..as a constitutional lawyer???? he knew this was going to be overruled by the supreme court...his little charade against the supreme court justices during his state of the union was planned..now when they overrule the current law, he can say they were just “getting even” and will use this to undercut and possibly stack the court in the way roosevelt tried to....just wait and see

livius. Just, livius:

Believe me, the WH knows the Pope’s name. This is the only serious, powerful opposition Bambi has. In his first year, Obama did everything possible to essentially imply that he was the head of the Church, in fact; things like the showdowns over the Notre Dame degree, the address at Georgetown, etc. were all positioned to show that the bishops were powerless and that Obama was essentially the one who called the shots in the Catholic Church. Obviously, he did this with the assistance of both clerical and lay followers, who really do regard him as more important than the Pope.

However, because the Church is an actual, physical institution with a chain of command (although not a very functional one, alas!), Obama knows that no matter what he does, he will not be accepted as their leader by all Catholics, simply because he is not the Pope and never can be. BTW, it doesn’t seem to matter to him that he’s not a Catholic and in fact is either a Muslim or an athiest; he sees himself as the rightful head of the Church simply because it is the biggest organization around.

He could, in theory, pull a Henry VIII and get American Catholics to make some sort of statement or oath of fidelity to him and then begin persecution of those who did not. But that wouldn’t be sufficient in this day and age, and I doubt that even Henry could have pulled it off under modern conditions

What can he do? Personally, I think that when he feels that he has done as much damage as possible to this country and destroyed us, he will somehow make himself head of the UN. In the meantime, the way he will try to take over and destroy the Church is by first destroying this Pope and then forcing the choice of his selected candidate.

ClearCase_guy on how Anarchists are secretly liberals, just like Muslims and Nazis and Fascists and everything else bad:

the "anarchist" movement (like the Democrat Party)got hijacked by Marxists long ago. Anarchists today are nearly impossible to distinguish from Marxists -- the only difference I can see is a "Good Cop / Bad Cop" thing. The Marxists are the "good guys"(!) and they take a reasonable, pragmatic approach to social change. The Anarchists are the street fighters who will use violence to effect political change.

Cobra64 on a recent driveby in Washington DC:

Slow night in the White House...

"Obama steps out for quality time with the brothas."