O'Donnel stumbles into the truthl

A lot of non-Freepers are shocked O'Donnell didn't seem to know what was in the First Amendment. Freepers, of course, rally around the latest smear of their new Republican heroine-victim:

massgopguy on the illegitimacy of the Supreme Court:

Hugo Black was a Catholic hating Klansman.

And he kept hypnotizing the other Justices to vote with his bigoted views!

TruthShallSetYouFree goes with the usual:

“Separation of Church and State” is in the same (liberal) Constitution wherein you can find “A Woman’s Right to Abortion.”

The Supreme Court is super liberal!

hosepipe drops the Con-Law scholarship:

The Constitution separates the State from the Church...
NOT the church from the State..

Whats with all the laws passed to restrict "the Church" from "the State"..
Democrats must be dyslexic.. they reverse the context..
AND no republicans call them on it..

THIS MUST CHANGE... and it is.. The TP Caucus is growing, growing, growing..

You mean the supposedly economically conservative but not right-wing Tea Party Caucus?

UCANSEE2 also has some Con-Law:

I don’t need the Media to tell me about Separation of Church and State.

First off, they do not even have the terminology right, little lone any answer.

What the founding fathers referred to was the Separation of THE POWERS of CHURCH, and THE POWERS of STATE.

The POWERS! Thanks to the emphasis of CAPS LOCK it all makes SENSE!

truthfreedom:

Christine was right in the debate. She might’ve accidentally stumbled into it, but she was right.

She may sound ignorant, but if you rearrange her words, she's genius!