Epic legal misunderstandings provided by Graewoulf (( obama"care" violates the 1890 Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND is illegal by the U.S. Constitution.))Obama”care” was robo-signed by Congress, and is therefore illegal.
Obama”care” was 2700 pages long, but is still being written, but not by Congress: witness the forced contraception coverage recently.
Obama”care” has caused “The Catholic Spring.”
Obama”care” reduces competition, and therefore is illegal by the 1890 Sherman Anti-Trust Law.
Obama”care” is designed to be a US Federal Government monopoly, with no competition.
Obama”care” also is illegal according to the US Constitution, because it violates our freedom of choice.
Will THE NINE SUPREMES notice any of these three violations? I seriously doubt it.
Impeached Bill Clinton proved that the US President is above US Federal Law, so anything that the President wants he gets, regardless of the Federal Laws that he has violated.
"Words had to change their ordinary meaning and to take that which was now given them. Reckless audacity came to be considered the courage of a loyal ally; prudent hesitation, specious cowardice; moderation was held to be a cloak for unmanliness; ability to see all sides of a question, inaptness to act on any. Frantic violence became the attribute of manliness" -Thucydides
Monday, March 26, 2012
And now this word from outer space
The ways Obamacare is illegal edition:
Great fear mongering thread here: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2863882/posts
ReplyDeleteObama has the audacity to utter the words, "This is my last election." THIS MEANS HE'S PLANNING TO KILL ALL OF US! WAKE UP WHITE PEOPLE!
Ozy, you posted so much Freeper Madness today that every time I try to post, I just stop.
ReplyDeleteYeah, there's been a lot.
ReplyDeleteI've got another 3 threads coming later todsy, including Dr. Teeth's offering.
-Santorum's World After Obama ad.
-Was Trayvon Martin a Drug Dealer?
-Dreams of Sarah Palin at the Convention
Obama"care" also is illegal according to the US Constitution, because it violates our freedom of choice.
ReplyDeleteDoes this mean Graewoulf is pro-choice?