Surpreme Court Strikes Down AZ Voter Law

Too easy, FreeperFan! But I'll admit I wouldn't have wanted to miss the fun this thread brings.

In a technical decision about the interplay between State and Federal power, a 7-2 decision by Scalia held that Arizona's strict ID requirement to vote was preempted by the Federal Government's Voting Rights Act.

Freepers are in a fanciful mood these days, and alternatively lament the apocalyptic world this decision creates and yell about blackmail.

Flintlock knows how to assure policy changes:

Screw the Suprimes.

IMPEACH THE LOT!

Vaduz has a diagnosis:

SCOTUS = 100% Liberal

littleharbour totally read the opinion. Uh-huh. See his analysis?

Scalia jumped the shark. And these fools dared to suggest that Thomas didn’t have the intellectual gravitas to sit on the Supreme Court. Thomas’ dissent is a brilliant piece of legal analysis and original intent Constitutional interpretation.

I actually believe skeeter did read the opinion:

I tried to read the decision. Gobbledygook.

With the integrity of the nation's form of government on the line, these guys are debating the minutia. Alice in Wonderland.

This is too important for the law!!!!!

headstamp 2 explains what this opinion says:

So basically anybody can vote in our elections now.

The Republic is finished.

ConservativeMan55 also thinks no proof of citizenship means no checking on voters at all:

Can you imagine ANY other country.. in the entire damn world saying.. “we will let anyone vote”

Do you think I could go to China, Mexico, Spain, Russia, Iran.. and vote and them not know who I am??

CottShop is not a fan of John Roberts. Or correcting typoes:

EDIT: Turns out the guys has some sort of issue with seeing the letters he types. Well, still some crazy John Roberts hate!

alogn came the TRAITOR John Roberts saying it was legal for our govnerment to FORCE us to purchase soemthing because, get this, ‘it’s not the supreme court’s job to protect the peopel from their own choices’ (Apparently the traitor will then be ok with a republican president coming along and declarign that NO man shall EVER asgain have the right to demand that any citizen purchase anything agaisnt hteir will’ and to make that a permanent law which can never be undone- Yeah I didn’t htink so either=- the Traiter John Roberts will probably come alogn and overturn suchg a law then declarign he’s doign so to protect the citizens)

Now we have the Supreme court tellign states they have no right to try to prevent ILLEGAL votes? Whjat next? Will the Traitor John Roberts then declare states have no right tryign to prevent ILLEGALS from raping? Murdering? Stealing? By declarign hte states may saty ‘how’ citizens are not allowed to commit crimes, but it may not say “Who’ is to be boudn by state laws?

We have a bunch of court jesters presiding over us i nthe supreme court

First, voting rights. Then, legalized raping!
,br/> EXCH54FE knows what comes next:

This is the next step in the fall of the U.S.A.

No controls, no requirements to vote, no checks to stop anyone from voting more than one time.

Our next vote will be for a life time “king”

:-(

central_va blames popular voting for US Senators somehow.

This latest display of Federal tyranny was made possible by the 17th amendment. Thank you 17th amendment.

FR_addict knows what's going on:

Looks like Roberts isn’t the only one being blackmailed.

fwdude also blames blackmail:

Just what does the NSA have on the SCOTUS?

Valid point. Roberts isn't the only one they've dug up dirt on. This administration is blackmailing as many Justices as possible.

Obama blackmailing everyone who isn't a Freeper is the new Obama is gay Freeper wisdom!

Iron Munro says what all the Freepers are implying:

Surpreme Court Strikes Down AZ Voter Law

Obama Controlled Court Strikes Down AZ Voter Law