Friday Spotlight: Finny

Finny

Finny is a woman who loves old movies, is really angry about how liberals cheated George HW Bush, and doesn't like feminism.

She also seems to think most of America is conservative, but for all the voter fraud. She's pretty into righteousness, but not in the usual Freeper hivemind way. Instead, she spends most of her time these days arguing with other Freepers that their vote for Romney made them liberals. With lots of italics, some CAPS, and using their screenname a lot. So yeah, she's a pretty special kind of asshole. Just read her profile.

Another Freeper women that thinks men are better.

I hate to say it, but we've become a country of timid, traumatized men, and who's damned fault is that? Grrrrrrrrr. The government (of course), the Left, and women. No Fault Divorce, where women overwhelmingly have gotten the spoils of parental authority for the past two generations, has done more to rape boys and men in America than anything, and it was powered and enabled by the left and government. The boy sees his father an emasculated slave, and wonders what he has to look forward to as a dad himself.

I'd rather vote for men. I'm almost a misogynist, though I'm a woman. I love Thatcher, I love Palin. I'd vote for both. But on balance, I prefer men. It saddens me to see that in America today, THE WOMEN are the ones carrying the Limited Government Conservative banner so high -- where the hell are the guys? But I know they're there, I'm just bitching.

Hey, I'm female.

Liberals are just a cheating minority.

Liberals have to cheat to win because the majority of legitimate American voters REJECT THEM.

WE are the majority; the fact that liberals have to cheat to win tells us so. The MSM and popular entertainment culture only make it appear that there are more liberals than there actually are, and WAY TOO MANY of us (including me) have bought it so thorougly that we've been conditioned to accept fraudulent liberal election "victories" as genuine.

It finally started to dawn on me just how MUCH most of Regular Joe and Jane Americans reject liberalism when I started to read the reader comments on non-conservative news sites like Yahoo News and the L.A. Times. It's a real eye-opener, in a good way.

NO need for evidence - Veganism is child abuse

Parents who encourage or force their kids to go vegan: that is CHILD ABUSE. Vegegarian is one thing. Kids can thrive. Vegan is a whole 'nother ballgame. Those poor little things have gray circles under their eyes. They're wan. Often listless. I want to slap those parents.

I want to send them to an island where everybody gets a pony. And leave them there. That's what they want in how they eat -- to not have to be "mean" to animals by eating meat and dairy -- and they will throw temper tantrums to have their pony, at the expense of their own children. Stupid, silly, self-absorbed morons. Nutrituion is like gravity. You don't get to choose.

Obama is assassinating novelists who disagree with him

Vince Flynn...now Tom Clancy...

and Breitbart etc, etc.

not necessarily a conspiracy theorist but.....

Don’t forget Michal Crichton. His book “State of Fear” was RIGHT ON THE MONEY. Having re-read it, I am seriously thinking that the man was assassinated.

But weirdly sane about illegal immigration?

you live in Virginia. I live in California and always have, with lots and lots of lovely Mexicans, for almost 57 years. I've worked side-by-side with many illegals; I have even helped hide one from the INS. WHY? Because he was a better co-worker, more honest, and a hell of a lot more industrious, than the lop-headed entitlement-minded "legal" teenager who would have taken his place.

Your use of the word Gestapo is particularly offensive. WRONG. It is particularly accurate. Like I say, I live and work here in the middle of it. You in Virginia can pretend that Gestapo-type tactics wouldn't result and cry about "emotion laden pejoratives"; from Ivory Towers, it looks just that way, but here on the front lines, we know that firebrand is right.

No one is advocating rounding up the illegals and putting them on rail cars ... It sure sounds that way to me, and in that, I'll admit I may be misjudging you. I sure as hell HOPE that no one is advocating "rounding up the illegals." If they are, I invite THEM to come do it themselves and leave me out of it.

Excerpts from her purism manifesto

It's very simple. That you think it's smug or arrogant is beyond me. It's simple. It's like putting a foot on a gas pedal, or taking it off the gas pedal. It is a FUNCTION. When you vote FOR politicians who work to advance government instrusion, and Romney did that DRASTICALLY in every aspect of life, from using government to force people to accept open homosexuality and promote it to their grade school kids via Gay Youth Pride, to funding abortion to writing the original Obamacare, to stating publicly that he thinks the "carbon" problem needs a world-wide solution, not an American one --

Gas pedal. Push, function, go. Vote for Romney or Schwarzenegger or Meg Whitman or Mitch McConnell or McCain or way too many "Republicans", and you get all the things you just FUNCTIONALLY voted for.

Voting FOR liberalism on the pretense of voting "against" it, is guaranteed to fail. Voting "against" is as imaginary as "purists." In asking me to accept Romney on the LIE that I only had to compromise 20 percent, the entire rationale that you uphold and promote, in your informed and thoughtful posts, indeed -- the SIMPLE truth is that it's getting to the point where there is very little or no compromise at all. Nobody asked or expected me to compromise with Romney. They asked me to abandon my principles so entirely as to vote for an agent with a lifelong political career of acting AGAINST them! SIMPLE TRUTH, if one is honestly informed as to Romney's real record.

And people like you have the gall to call me a "purist" and attribute my motives to want to be noble. Smug? Arrogant? *rolls eyes* Do you even know the meaning of the word "purist"?????

I don't know how old you are or how long you've been voting. I've been voting straight Republican for more than 35 years. Romney was the bridge too far, the eye opener, the wake up call as to the futility. Your "puristst" are unicorns, truly, they are Bigfoot.

And when voters hold their nose in the voting booth -- as all did in this past election -- be assured that America is going to get exceedingly stinky leadership.

Your vote is FUNCTIONAL. I understand now what I didn't understand eight, 10, 20 years ago and which you don't fundamentally grasp now, either. When I voted for Arnold Schwarzenegger, I was a functional liberal. When I voted for Meg Whitman, I was a functional liberal. When you voted for Mitt Romney, you were a functional liberal.

Voting for functional liberals when you're a Republican is STUPID. Always.

Liberals all over Freep!

You are a functional liberal, pal. PERIOD. You may be registered as a Republican, you may agree with conservative values, but you ARE a functional LIBERAL.

Period.

So pissed off about car pool lanes:

Can you imagine the Westward Expansion today?

Dead in its tracks. Government screws things up six ways to Sunday, invariably, from education to daily commutes!

It ain't rocket science. So Cons should see that about 95 percent of social issues that bug conservatives today, were and are enabled solely by government, not to mention all other manifestations of stupid crap like *%^#!!! car pool lanes in So Cal that are just plain lunacy, reducing functional ability by 10 to 30 percent. The ONLY reason they're there is because of government. PERIOD. The state takes federal money to keep the infrastructure, but a condition of getting it is to build *^&%*@#!!! car pool lanes and all the special off-ramps and bridges and special exists and gazillion dollar *^&#!! horsesh*t it entails ...

In every way -- The government needs to shut up and butt out.

Where can I vote for that?

Angry Freeper bert? Another liberal.

Okay, Bert, let's see if you "cop out" on answering this simple question. When you voted "against" Obama, what were you voting FOR? You will cop out and tell me what you were voting against. You will refuse to admit that you voted FOR an overt agent of everything morality and political conservatism stands against.

On the contrary, bert, voting for a pro-abortion-for-minors (you can look it up if you don't believe me), pro-homosexual, pro-global warming, pro-gun control, pro government micro-managed and controlled health care, pro activist judges "Republican" was the real cop out.

Hey, BERT??? And everybody else here who voted for Romney and would do so again in 2016 -- had the bastard won and was now implementing all the amoral tyranny he has advocated and advanced for his ENTIRE political career, who among you would be ACCOUNTABLE for what you voted FOR?

Voting "against" is like voting for the tooth fairy. WAKE UP. Stop letting emotions (namely pure blind fear) dictate your political choices and START THINKING ABOUT THE MATH.

In any election, any where, any time, a thousand years ago or a thousand years from now, in ANY ELECTION, you only get to vote FOR. Those who think they can vote "against" are like those who think they can have ice cream hot.

But lets not get emotional now:

I absolutely would have voted for Hillary I do not believe SHE IS HELL BENT on destroying our country! .... There is a HUGE difference in a liberal and a MARXIST!!!

Pure hysteria, pure panic, pure emotion, zero thinking. So here we have it -- a REPUBLICAN who'd have voted FOR Hillary Clinton because it would have been voting "against" a Marxist Muslim.