Spotlight Friday: WondrousCreation

WondrousCreation

Anonymous found this one, and thinks it might be a Poe.

Not me. I think this guy is legit, if not exactly a Freeper. He's a creationist. A full time, all-the-way creationist. And I think he came to Free Republic from some creationist forum in the hopes of some gentle evangelizing of this allied flock - his ideas are too well-formed, his gentle urging toward theocracy too constant, and his profile is too mainstream Freep (and doesn't mention creationism).

Alas, he is long gone, with his last post in 2009. But what remains is pretty amazing. Sure, he may not be a "real" Freeper (IMO) you can find such things on creationist forums, but here it is pure, oh so pure.

Real Scientists.

Real scientists understand that the Holy Bible, written by the Finger of the Lord, is the origin of all applicable science.

"the Finger of the Lord." Heh. Maybe a bit Poe-ish.

God, The Universe Everything: α-Ω. (-6000)

considering that the Lord is the source of all science. His mention should be explicit in every science article!

Science means no questions

The Bible is 100% accurate and cannot be questioned. Simple logic leads one to that conclusion. Anyone who thinks that the Bible is NOT 100% accurate isn't using logic.

The Bible proved the world is round way before science!

The materialists here would have us think that it's "science" that tells us the earth isn't flat. Without God and the Bible, "science" would probably still have us thinking that, along with all the other godless myths they advocate (like global warming and evolutionism).

I think he hate-reads Scientific American

In a time when “science” says unborn babies are descendants of pond goo, the universe began from a spinning dot that just ‘decided’ to explode, the firmament of heaven is nothing more than quantum particles zipping around each other and the (very real) terror of hell below is just the rumbling of ‘magma and plate tectonics’, it’s wonderful to see a great mind stand for real scientific truth. Bravo, Dr. Bergman!

Ahh, the best science was the 1800s science.

Prior to the dominance of evolutionism in science, great leaps and bounds were made, climaxing with the great creation scientists Louis Pasteur, Michael Faraday, James Clerk Maxwell, and others like them, who operated in the looming shadow of Darwinism, which hadn't yet acquired the demonically-inspired strength to control science.

Yeah, not a fan of that demon-inspired Darwin.

Charles Darwin was WORSE than any terrorist - he turned future generations against the Creator, and totally ruined pure science - just look at the anti-God dreck that has passed for science over the last century!

We Surround Them.

Evolutionists are monsters who have no place in conservatism, let alone civilized society! Not only should they be shunned from conservatism, but it's time to take stronger action; Godly conservatives need to actively protest the scientific minority (i.e. University "science" departments) who still promote these dead theories. With continued diligence, I predict in a few years that, like their cousins, the Global Warming Alarmists, these scientists will be arrested for fraud and abuse of research funds, their welfare funding pulled, their ivory towers smashed, and new age of scientific advancement in the Spirit of the Creator will be upon us!

Theocracy Now!

Men are free, but this freedom should not include the right to deny the source of our freedom, and it is high time society stopped tolerating their insolence!

I am glad the site owner explicitly agrees with your sentiment!

More triumphalism.

We indeed live in a privileged time, to be witnessing what looks like the final collapse of Darwin's demonic philosophy! When the evo bandwagon is finally capsized, and science can again be pursued according to the will of our Creator, we might finally again see real scientific progress again, as opposed to the secular stagnation of the last century.

Invoking JimRob's name. He does know how to operate in a regime!

Would you guess he was never formally educated?

As if gubmint-funded education in our graduate indoctrination centers makes anyone more skilled at science. Your average conservative creationist FReeper apparently knows more about common-sense-based science than typical overeducated evo goons do.

I've seen creationists, armed for online spiritual combat with only the Word of God and self-taught Creation Science dance circles around PhDs on FreeRepublic and other forums, where the moderation is actually fair and balanced, and not tilted toward the side of the evos.

Your typical PhD might know this-and-that about some anhydride chemical balance of saline electrolytes in the mating habits of the diurnal cycle of some obscure mutation of the Atlantic sea slug, but they don't know squat about the big picture, except for rampant speculation.

That's where the common sense input of FreeRepublic comes in, to stamp out the fancy-talk of the libs who are running the "science" show, and bring some objective truth into the matter. And the evidence shows, without a doubt, that the "scientists" have no clue, and that Creation prevails!

If I had a PhD from a so-called "university" who teaches this modern "science" nonsense, I'd want my money back for the fraud being filled into my head.

Disproving fossilization via consumer meats.

All I know is, if I bury a fresh T-Bone steak in the back yard, I won't be digging up anything that resembles a fresh T-Bone steak 80 million years later, though (more or less), that's exactly what they say happened here. I'm just glad that brainwashed evos aren't checking my food expiration dates at the local supermarket!

Wait, here he seems to believe in fossils.

The only ones who think there's "8-20" mass extinctions are evo scientists who have (unwisely) refused to consult with the best and brightest in the creation science community, who (as usual) are way ahead of evos on the "problem" of multiple mass extinctions. Truth is, the only mass extinction of any import is the so-called Cretaceous extinction, which represents the activity of the Flood. Other apparent "strata" (Devonian, Silurian, etc.) are just different layers simultaneously deposited by the Flood. The appearance of the "stratification" of fossils is due to hyrdological sorting:

DNA is too hard to understand to be real.

Either a piece of DNA is total junk, or it's useful. Period. It's that simple. If a section of DNA is found to have a transcribing region, no matter how small, than it's not "junk" - it's evidence for a Designer.

I've heard desperate evos, realizing their heyday is over, claim that these are only "small coding regions amidst the junk", like an "occasional oasis in a desert". They use some sorry excuse like "exaptation of junk code", as if bits of information could somehow be added to the once-useless code, just like in "flipping a switch". (Well, what flips the switch, and keeps it flipped, assuming that's the mechanism? Evolution has no such mechanism to do that.)

What a joke. Again, the overeducated evoloser scientists are outdone by their creationist counterparts, despite their disparate gubmint funding. The evo science wannabees need to start leaving the real research to the true pros: the Creation Scientists.

Modern scientists, always hating on that Second Law of Thermodynamics!

The truth is, the Second Law of Thermodynamics is, alone, an airtight argument against evolution. That's why the evos have fought so hard to discredit it, and why some men have chosen to cower to the "embarrassment" that evos have tried to make them feel on the topic.

Order can never arise from chaos without an intelligent agent. Period. The 2nd Law is universal and better-understood by Creation Scientists than most physicists.

It gets awesome when he takes on geocentrism, and why we don't fly off the spinning Earth

It goes to show that even "settled" and "simple" issues like geocentrism aren't really settled or simple at all. If the simple Darwinian/Copernican model of the solar system was indeed correct, it means the Earth would be moving at many hundreds, even thousands of miles per hour, and that these speeds, somehow combined with all the other celestial objects, somehow results in what we call "gravity".

Not only can physicists not explain why we don't feel the effects of these whiplash-speeds, it appears that their heliocentric model really doesn't make things any simpler than the geocentric model. Very interested indeed, yet these scientists pass themselves as the "Ultimate Authority" on the matter. (More and more people are starting to see through the sham called 'modern science', I see...)

The real reason we don't fly off the Earth? God's magic

You do know that the moon rotates around the Earth at around 2300 miles per hour, right? Did the astronauts on the moon get "whiplash"? And even in a geocentric universe, Mars has an orbital velocity of tens of thousands of miles per hour. Do you think NASA could have landed multiple probes and rovers there if they were so off in their calculations of orbital velocity? Did the Mars landers experience "whiplash"?

Your argument is a strawman, as are most evo arguments. The whole point is that no one feels the whiplash such high speeds would suggest! This shows evidence that there is more involved in the "simple" laws of motion and relativity than simplistic secular science can explain.

Conservapedia!

Conservapedia is one of the most well-reasoned, logical and reliable new sites on the internet. It's only a matter of time before the (much better-researched) information there supplants the liberal anti-God Wikipedia as the first place good Christian Americans look for sound information!

Conservapedia doesn't suffer from the censorship of alternative (and generally more reliable) ideas the way Wikipedia does. God Bless the brilliant Andy Schlafly for starting this site, and smacking it to lib historians and godless scientists (who incidentally know about a tenth of what he and his staff knows about anything.)

(The only sites that are probably better and wide-scoping are FreeRepublic and WorldNetDaily.)

Hey, psst, Free Republic, you should zot all the noncreationists!

As the site owner, Jim Robinson, has expressed, if we can pick and choose from the Word of God, then we can pick and choose from the Constitution, as well. If you don't believe the whole Constitution as it literally stands, you're no conservative. The same applies to the Creation - if you don't believe it as it literally stands, you're no conservative, and you don't belong here.

Watered-down conservatism will never prevail - the pretenders and RINOs need to go, and the precedent has (thankfully) been set here! Only then, by appealing to true, undiluted conservatives, can FreeRepublic fire up the base and get the votes to put conservatives back in charge of our once great nation.

Oh, and anything but young earth creation will not be accepted:

All right - if you reject a 6 day creation and a young earth, how can you be a creationist?

Does this mean that you really believe that some "fossils" are hundreds of millions of years old, while others are only millions of years old? This would mean that animals weren't all created simultaneously, but one at a time - how's that any different from what the Darwinists believe? It's certainly not what it says in the Bible.

Do you also reject the notion of a worldwide Flood, which created the varied landscapes, fossil depositions and continents we see today, in favor of discredited gradualistic theories?

What other parts of the Bible do you reject in the name of "science"? The origin of languages at Babel? Jacob's wrestling with the Lord? The lengthening of the day at the command of Joshua? The existence of Behemoth and Leviathan? Ezekiel's vision of the Cherubim and Seraphim? The earthquake at Jericho? The Virgin Birth? The Resurrection of Christ?