Their passion for this silliness is amazing.
SampleMan:
Just like all of the other mass shooters.CodeToad agrees:
Of course he is a liberal. The vast majority of mass murderers have been liberals.Grampa Dave actually smugly performs a biased sampling:
In 1865 a Democrat shot and killed Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States.Qbert blames how liberalism is all about violence and paranoia:
In 1963 a radical left wing communist shot and killed John F. Kennedy, President of the United States.
In 1975 a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at Gerald Ford, President of the United States.
In 1983 a registered Democrat shot and wounded Ronald Reagan.
In 1984 James Huberty a disgruntled Democrat shot and killed 22 people in a McDonalds restaurant.
In 1986 Patrick Sherril a disgruntled Democrat shot and killed 15 people in an Oklahoma post office.
In 1990 James Pough a disgruntled Democrat shot and killed 10 people at a GMAC office.
In 1991 George Hennard a disgruntled Democrat shot and killed 23 people in a Lubys cafeteria.
In 1995 James Daniel Simpson a disgruntled Democrat shot and killed 5 coworkers in a Texas laboratory.
In 1999 Larry Asbrook a disgruntled Democrat shot and killed 8 people at a church service.
In 2001 a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at the White House in a failed attempt to kill George W. Bush, President of the US.
In 2003 Douglas Williams a disgruntled Democrat shot and killed 7 people at a Lockheed Martin plant.
In 2007 a registered Democrat named Seung - Hui Cho shot and killed 32 people in Virginia Tech .
In 2010 a mentally ill registered Democrat named Jared Lee Loughner shot Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and killed 6 others.
In 2011 a registered Democrat named James Holmes went into a Colorado movie theater and shot and killed 12 people.
In 2012 Andrew Engeldinger a disgruntled Democrat shot and killed 7 people in Minneapolis.
On 9/16/2013, another mentally ill liberal, Aaron Alexis, killed 12 innocents at the Navy Yard in Washington DC.
One could go on, but you get the point, even if the media does not.
Clearly, there is a problem with Democrats having guns.
No NRA members, No Tea Party members, or No Republican conservatives are/were involved.
Or the other O supporters: mass murderer Chris Dorner, terrorist Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, attempted mass killer Floyd Corkins...Columbine kids were young, probably libs.
All from the paranoid, violent style of American leftism...
Yaelle knows the media never reports on nonpolitical killers' political affiliations to cover up this liberal slaughter:
Heading on tonight’s newscasts: “...the Obama supporter who murdered 13 at the Washington naval yard...”Sarah Barracuda enjoys imagining that the media is made uncomfortable by this irrelevancy:
Ah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.
Notice the look on Tapper’s face when he heard that Alexis is a liberal..hopefully Tapper was wearing dark pants, he looked like he was about to soil them. Sandy Hook, Santa Monica College shooter, Ft Hood, Aurora Colorado, now Washington Navy Yard, every single one of those shooters had one thing in common..ALL LIBERAL..maybe there should be gun control, for liberals, since obviously they cant handle a gunA_Former_Democrat has the shooter all figured out:
Black, deranged, criminal, converted Buddhist, lazy . . . well credentialed Obambi voterA Cyrenian is super pissed at Obama for shooting those people:
If obama had a son, he would look like this piece of crap. Maybe obama should serve this guy’s sentence.bert brings up a similarly irrelevant aspect of the killer:
and....... like the attempted murderer Trayvon, he was Black.
I know the FReeptards would get a collective boner when it came out that the shooter was black AND liberal (allegedly). They finally got their man.
ReplyDeleteJust as presuctably, they got their collective Depends in a twist over the media not making his blackness or liberal ness the top focus. Of course, liberals (read: any non-Freeper) realize that his liberal blackness is unworthy of discussion since neither is a factor in why he did what he did. The fact that he was a paranoid schizophrenic might be just a little more important. Hence the talking points have more logically focused on mental health, the credentialing process at government installations, and questioning the legal access to firearms by those with histories of mental issues and criminal behavior.
The takeaway here is that Freepers are sub-one dimensional thinkers who actually legitimately think the media should be discussing liberal/black violence. They literally cannot compute that anything else could be more pertinent in their little alternate reality bubble.
-FresnoGrifter
"liberals (read: any non-Freeper) realize that his liberal blackness is unworthy of discussion since neither is a factor in why he did what he did."
ReplyDeleteYep. And I say that as a very much none liberal. Dude is sick in the head. No other reason needed and who gives a crap about his color?
Freepers do! Did you see all the threads and posts wondering if all of the victims were whitel They wanted this to be the first salvo in the race war. The same war that they see themselves engaging in from the comfort of their homes. In all seriousness who do the Freepers think will be actively fighting this race war they want so badly.
DeleteI saw. To be honest, apart from a couple of them who do know their way around things and don't exactly talk about it, they just make me laugh.
DeleteI know Ozzie is pretty cool with the site - so have a peek at http://www.cracked.com/blog/5-signs-that-someone-isnt-actually-badass/ and match it up to the internet tough guys over there!
Freepers have also missed the obvious fact that ALL OF THE SHOOTERS ARE MEN, in spite of their clear contempt for women. They might as well say all men are mass murderers, but they'd rather just single out their perceived racial or political or religious opponents. Wonder what they think of these two geniuses, who managed to both get killed:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.freep.com/article/20130919/NEWS06/309190188/1001/rss01