Friday, November 2, 2007

Those racist democrats!

I find Freeper's reaction to race interesting. If you are a black conservative, they love you. If you are a black liberal, they blame your race. If you are a Hispanic or Arab conservative, you are suspect.

And, of course, the sins of Jim Crowe continue to be visited on the Democrats.

Slavery? Democrats
Black Freedom? Republican
Segregation? Democrats
Desegregation? Republican
Ghettos? Democrat
Escape them? Republican!

If Democrats had any brains they’d be Republicans - Ann Coulter

Indeed, if one looks at history only up through about 1964, the Democrats do look pretty bad. And since then, of course, there's the huge Republican crusade against the ghettos, which I'm sure I'd heard of if it wasn't for the liberal media!

L98Fiero agrees, though he seeks to understand why the blacks vote for slavery.

It’s a good article but but it seems like blacks are considered mindless pawns who have no capacity to make their own political decisions. They are “forced to suffer” and all that.

There are only two real possibilities here:

1.) Blacks are largely so dumb they vote for the party that did all it could to keep them enslaved.

2.) Blacks are largely Socialist Democrats by choice.

Of course, #2 is the correct answer.

Of course, the black race tends towards socialism. Good thing the Republicans are so evolved they don't judge them, and continue to try to help them.

Oh noes, the liberal school system is getting into the act!

I think it goes to the core of why public schools no longer focus on American History.

If they did, the students would learn which political party was heavily invested in maintaining slavery. They’d know which party nominated a candidate in the 1864 election against Lincoln, on a ‘peace platform’ that allowed for slavery to continue in the South, and would negotiate a settlement to the war that would allow the Confederacy to break away from the Union.

Indeed, all those "South will rise again!" neo-Confederates are total democrats nowadays. The public school democrat slavery cover-up is the reason why no one teaches American History. And by American History in Capital Letters, I mean History Of America Doing No Wrong Except For Slavery, and That was Just the Democrats.

And finally, we weave the tapestry together:
How can I be a racist when I am against the genocide of black babies (abortion)?
Good point. It's a desire for racial equality that drives the pro life lobby. Wow, some people can really make everythign about abortion. I'm sure they're a riot at cocktail parties.

"You know who else would like crab dip? MURDERED BABIES!"

Thursday, November 1, 2007

Hildabeast Thursdays

This week is rife with scandals for Hillary: her dodging/weaving at the debate, Peter Paul's accusations, Obama's little jabs. And of course, Freepers are on the case for all of these. But the craziest accusation this week?

Her lesbian lover is a Saudi Spy!

Original Poster KayEyeDoubleDee links to a bunch of gossip stories about a female associate of Hillary's, who has *gasp* Muslim parents! Clearly a spy!

RC@ notes the importance of this story:
Great.....a bull dyke for President. Just what this country.....or the world.....really needs right now. Will Iran negotiate with a dyke? Don’t they hang them over there? A lesson on how to make our country look the fool in one easy election. Great, just great.
Good point. Better not let Iran see this unsubstantiated rumor. "Make the country look like a fool?" What, for not noticing Hillary was a fascist-commie lesbian? Well, good thing Free Republic is on the case.

One small item that caught my eye.

Notice in the photos, with both of them, they wear opposite colored clothing, in the next they have switched.

That's some good detective work, Lou. Switching colors is is one of those super secret gay signals, I'm sure! It's probably also an Al Qaeda signal.

Some don't believe the story. But, rather than appear sane, they blame this on an intricate Clintonista plan

But the original poster points out the real danger: Al Qaeda!
Folks, this is a Clintonian trap.

I'm not worried about a Clintonian trap.

I'm worried about a Wahhabi trap.

This girl's resume just screams "Saudi Intelligence".

Or, worse yet, Al Qaeda intelligence.

Beautiful, wealthy, sexy, composed, unflappable, femme-fatale is the classic profile of a mole.
He's seen the movies! All Hot, rich woman are moles! Beware!!

Speaking of hot, some Freepers had to add some racism to this thread.
Based on her picture in that red dress - NOT GUILTY!
Why look at facts, when boobs are much more interesting, eh?

RoseofTexas would like to add some homophobia to go with that racism:
Two things will happen here...(1) the SHE-LESBO-DEVIL’s cronies will immediately announce Huma’s engagement to a stooge or they’ll ship her out of the country ASAP like they've done in the past!
"like they've done in the past?" Hillary: female rapist! The perfect match for Bill! You heard it on Free Republic Watch first!

Wednesday, October 31, 2007

Paranoia, thy name is Free Republic

A scary one for y'all this evening. When a poster has computer problems, Free Republic is on the case!

TBP is the first to suggest foul play:

The leftwingers at Google can eagerly cooperate with the Butchers of Beijing but try to ban conservative sites.

Nice to know that liberals are so conssitent.

Could google be secretly trying to do some social engineering? That would explain the liberal bias in today's youth!

Terpfen says it ain't so:
Google doesn’t filter content.

Not openly, anyway.

Of course Google would filter secretly! They're leftists. Lying is like breathing for them!

Then, 2 minutes later, the same poster decides he wasn't clear enough:

Google doesn’t filter content.

Guess again.

Well, that cleared things right up, then.

But it isn't till JerseyHighlander gets involved that the crazy really gets started:

Totalitarians of a socialist bent are gaming the Google threat detection and prevention system to deny access to views they deem a threat to their worldview.

Google has shown itself not to be lax, but an active participant in blocking the free speech over the internet of organizations that hold views opposed to by the staff of the Google corporation.

Google officially views you, your family, your neighbors, your community and the people of the United States as serfs without Constitutional rights, and they have now in the last month, clearly stated their position on your lack of humanity several times through their legal department.

Google has been hoisted upon this once beautiful thing called the “internet”, to be the jackboot to the throat of the people of the entire developed world.

Welcome to the new media, same as the old media.

Batten down your tin-foil hats, folks! The Google dictatorship is coming! Though it looks like it'll just be a changing of the guard compared to the CNNMSNBCCBS dictatorship I was part of and never knew.

Later, JersyHighlander elaborates on his manifesto:

Nefarious individuals coalesce around the idea of banning/blocking/denying access of conservative websites, they either find enough individuals to join their cause, or they build or rent out a botnet to send in abuse/spam/malware/ hate speech/child pornography complaints to various companies and organizations that maintain services that are blocklists. These companies include StopBadware.org, NetNanny, CastleCops etc.

FR has been blocked in the past through this method various times too. http://censorware.net/articles/01/06/16/0322210.shtml
http://www.google.com/search?q=freerepublic+blocked+at+ork&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

Google has a problem because they are actively supporting (financially, publicity wise, and legally) non profits who have active members who are actively sending in false complaints against conservative websites. It’s very cozy on their side.

That's why no one can get to Free Republic! So when I worked for the government, and Adsense blocked all the blogs, except for Free Republic, it was only to lull me into a false sense of security! And when the men in white coats take JerseyHighlander away, that'll be part of the comspiracy too!

Tuesday, October 30, 2007

Headscargate

Laura Bush, while in the middle east promoting breast cancer awareness, is given a headscarf. And she PUT IT ON!

“Oh no, she graciously accepted a gift and participated in something that is part of their religion/culture. What’s the world coming to? (/sarc)”

She and Bush also host a Ramadan feast in the WH every year for our “moderate” muslims. I say it is totally disgusting.

I agree! In fact, we should never talk to any Muslims ever! That'll show them to hate us for out freedom and tolerance!
What political ideology has a women’s head scarf as it’s symbol?

Islam. The gutter political ideology of the bastard Ishmael.
The original poster pointed out that both some Russians and some Jews wear headscarves too. But no one replied to that actual fact. Too much trouble hating on/defending the sainted Laura.
Gutter political ideology? Quite a broad brush there, farmer18th.

She is being attacked here for PUTTING ON A GIFT.

So, if they gave her a bright red bra, some matching panties and nice garters she'd have immediately put those "gifts" on?

(It's OK to insert a Judy Ruliani joke here. I did mention bra and panties...)
There you have it, folks! Headscarf = lingerie. Putting it on is damn near pornographic. I wonder if anyone told isthisnickcool about the unity of opposites? Cause that's kinda deep.

There’s no way anyone but an abject, hopeless idiot could think that what she did proved she has submitted to Islam.

You can spin it and all you want, including ad hominem attacks, but submission is exactly what she did. Our enemies will certainly see it that way.
This just in: Submission is done only through actions; no mental thought is needed. Laura Bush is now a muslim.

Bottom line is she was tricked into wearing the scarf with the “gift”. I’m sure there were protocols discussed with advance people that the First Lady would not be wearing head scarfs.

...the muzzies likely ordered the women to give her this “gift”. Never trust those people - ever.

This is probably my favorite. It's a vast brown people conspiracy! Be very afraid!




Monday, October 29, 2007

Free Republic: Not a fan of Ron Paul

when Free Republic heard that Ron Paul supporters were campaigning in San Francisco, the mixture
of Ron Paul (who they hate) and San Francisco (who they hate) made for a spicy meatball:

If you hate George Bush hard enough, any liberal enclave will welcome you...til Hillary says otherwise.

The idea that SF denizens will love a libertarian, so long as he hates the president doesn't seem to match with practice. But then there is the BDS meme still around.

Also: Hillary's control over liberals is so complete that with merely a word she can control their philosophical inclinations. Or something.

drpix has another theory. And, it involved pictures:

I think this RP campaign office is in SF - but I'm not sure.


The coy "I'm not sure" really makes it. Though Cocaine never struck me as SF's drug of choice, the denim-clad hippie in the picture is prove otherwise.

Finally, it wouldn't be Free Republic without some gay bashing upon the mention of San Francisco:
Is San Francisco Ron Paul territory? (Duh!)

Maybe because Ron Paul is bringing up the rear.

Ron Paul: libertarian buttsex ranger! Good thing Free Republic is on the case!

Saturday, October 27, 2007

Photoshop Phun

The UN is useless. Except they're going to take all our guns. It is kinda weird that Freepers Fear and hate the upended turtle so much.

Senator = Skunk. Subtle, but difficult to refute. I don't quite get how the Freepers don't think military service is enough to get citizenship. Hate > love of the military I guess.

Also, I like how their pictures are next to each other, as though they look similar.

Yup, Hillary hates the military. I'm sure the other senators were super happy when talking to Patreas.

Friday, October 26, 2007

What's Hillary doing now?

Kiling her cat, apparently.

Seems the Clintons gave up their cat upon leaving the WHite House, because it didn't get along with their dog. They gave teh cat to their former secretary. Siinister!

Free Republic is on this breaking story!
What kind of person gives up a pet after 8 years? A cold and heartless one.
The important thing when condemning Hilalry is to paint with a broad brush.

Why on earth would Hillary give away her familiar?

Or make some kind of antiquated wichcrafe joke.
OK, I have another question.

After Buddy's untimely end, I think Clinton got ANOTHER Lab named Seamus.

WHAT IN THE HECK HAS HAPPENED TO SEAMUS?????? Has anybody seen him lately?
The Clintons: killing pets just to watch them die.