By request: LGF is gay and has a funy name

Little Green Footballs seemed to be full of hate when last I visited in 2005 or so. But lately the founder has been railing against the right wing. He posts something of a manifesto listing the reasons. Freepers respond:

Carling see it all as one long troll:

He “parted” with the right because he was faking it to get hits on his blog. Now, he sees the real money is with Soros, so he slithers back home.

Good riddance, Charles, you spineless coward.

Also, Soros!

pissant knows what dislinking the right wing means:

Has he converted yet and started wearing a burkha?

It means being a Muslim girl!

Windflier makers an important point:

My first tip-off should have been the name of the site. Only a stoned liberal would choose such a name for their website.

Real sites are named "Free Republic" or "Liberty Forum" or "Ace of Spades"

dirtboy goes through the list point by point. Here is his best one though:

9. Anti-Islamic bigotry that goes far beyond simply criticizing radical Islam, into support for fascism, violence, and genocide (see: Pamela Geller, Robert Spencer, etc.)

So [LGF founder] CJ is pro-terrorist.

Either you want to kill all the Muslims amd form a police state or you are pro-terrorist!

Anti-Bubba182 is one of many who thinks turning liberal means you are totally gay:

If Johnson was Gay it would explain a lot, particularly his hostility to traditional religious conservatives and even more so to Muslims who routinely kill them.

kaylar thinks he isn't gay, he just acts like it:

No clue as to Charles Johnsons’ sexuality-wouldn’t recognize him if he walked right up to me-but years ago, even when he was primarily a WOT site, his posts struck me as very “queeny”. I refer especially to the angry, fly off the handle posts he would make whenever someone dared criticize the layout or the “look” of his blog. Very emotional, very touchy, very ‘take-everything-as-a-personal-attack-y’ posts, to the point that I would consider normal in a middle aged woman, but was odd in a young(ish) man.Just very ‘queeny’, not just in the sense of (drama) queeny, but in the sense that his posts seemed very female or effeminate. Again, this doesn’t necessarily make him gay, but it DOES make him an a#&^%*e, IMO.

Taking everything as a personal attack? Huh, doesn't sound like any websites I know...