And then what to my wondering eyes should appear but this thread:
Oldpuppymax starts us off strong:
We made the mistake of giving females the right to vote and we are now paying for it.heh. females.
cuban leaf elaborates:
And giving women the vote is what has caused the relatively swift dash to socialism we’ve seen. Not saying it’s bad or good, but just that it’s the kind of government you get when you add the female vote to that of the men who do vote for security over freedom. It is inevitable and totally predictable.You're not saying socialism is bad or good?
Erik Latranyi notes women are naturally dependent.
women follow their emotions far more than men, so liberalism appeals to that aspect.Yeah, conservatives never use "for the children."Also, conservatism is rugged individualism. Women are genetically predisposed to couple with a man, not do all things themselves.
The mother instinct also is a factor.....taking care of the weak, hurt or defenseless appeals to women.
Finally, liberals always use “the children” to prop up their horrible ideas. Women love children.
Steamburg laments how men are no longer manly, and women are ugly:
It seems women have been sold a huge bill of goods by the feminist movement (war to make room for ugly chicks). They have removed the testosterone from a whole generation of men so now they want the government to tell them what to do because genetically they require guidance. The truth often hurtsall the best is like Freud, only with more misogyny:
Strong and independent feminists are looking for a husband or father in the government. Somebody to protect them and provide for them. Everything about “progressivism” is twisted and deranged.monocle knows all women are whores:
When you’re looking for a sugar daddy look for one with the deepest of deep pockets.
Come down to my neighborhood, Steamburg. Tell those boys they don't have testosterone.
ReplyDelete