Argument by tautology

DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz said that the idea that life begins at conception was ‘Extreme and Radical. Since this would send women who used the Pill or IVF to jail for murderers, that seems hard to argue.

So Freepers didn't bother with arguments:

Arrowhead1952 must be vegetarian:

I got into an argument with a pro "choice" lib and eventually asked her: "If someone has a beating heart, is it OK to bury them?" No more comments from her.

Disagreeing with McBuff means you aren't human.

.it is a fundamental human nature to assume life exists if we are not certain. It is because we sense the value of life and thus, if we are to err. . .it should be on the side of life.

I have a cousin who suddenly disappeared nearly 40 years ago. To this day, my Aunt waits for him to return. Although, common sense tells her he must be dead, until a body is produced and buried, this mother will not have closure. This expresses something deeply and uniquely human.

Not only does abortion likely kill a human being, but it certainly kills this essential human quality within anyone who embraces the idea of abortion. . .thus, it kills the soul of a nation that accommodates it

driftdiver knows pro-choice means self-centered.

They simply do not value the life of the unborn. They are far too self centered.

iontheball thinks being pro-choice is like Islam:

Notice the similarity between Wasserman-Schultz's statement and Islam's claim that Sharia is great because it “protects the dignity of women.” You have to hand it to these socialists, they sure are audacious in making baseless arguments.

Casie notes the messenger is ugly:

With today's hair care products and incredibly skilled (and inexpensive) stylists, there is simply no excuse for that hair.

bert also piles on to the messenger:

wassernan-shultz is redundant attention getter.

For her life has never begun and is not being lived. to whine and complain and perpetually be uncomfortable is not to live.

She is so uptight she shuns personal hygiene. her hair is a perpetual tangled mess and indicative of her slovenly ways..

Also IbJensen

Debbie Washerwoman Schultz is a very homely, rather unwashed looking but typical DemocRAT female. Her opinions and her presence in the Congress (a collection of Baboons) are what have caused this catastrophe in America!

muir_redwoods argues it's a tautology:

I've never understood the dispute here; it's a tautology that life begins at the beginning.

The veiled arguement is that it's okay to end a life after it begins and we should not be reminding the pro death people that they are engaged in s killing.

momtothree doesn't understand what private means.

The article states essentially that abortion is an extremely private issue between a woman, her doctor and family... well, isn’t all planned murder? If a woman decides to have her husband killed for the insurance money (for example).... wouldn’t that issue be intense and private between herself and her hired killer?

exDemMom blames women.

The radical point of view, in my opinion, is the view that women are too stupid and incapable of controlling their own behavior, so that unless “smart” people like Schultz lie to them about pregnancy so they’ll be willing to have abortions, they’ll be baby machines.

driftdiver builds a strawman.

I once had a very liberal boss. Somehow we started discussing this issue. She commented that there are too many people in the world anyway and she really didn’t care.

PapaNew:

A lot of scientific (and obvious) fact might seem “extreme and radical.” The liberals try to reject the parts of reality they don’t like. However, God didn’t ask their permission when he set things up

Yes, this sounds like what the liberals are doing...