Whenever there's a crime, Freepers have taken to assuming it's a black guy, or maybe a Muslim until prove otherwise. This is quite convenient for their white-guy-victim narrative. And hey, when it's affirmitavely proved to be a white guy, they kinda still believe it wasn't.
This the comedy of crazy that is this incident where someone ran their car into a crowd in LA. Guy turned out to be white. Watch as Freepers turn from smug assumption to stubborn straw-grabbing in moments:
X-spurt lays out the only possibilities:
Arrested but MSM posts no ID? That can only mean three things, either the perp is a democrat, a muslim or a holderite.Vigilanteman seconds:
Yep. 100% chance of one of the three. 50% chance of two of the three. 33% chance of all three.Vigilanteman adds a codicil:
Ah you left out the other protected class....illegal alienMenehune56 wonders if the DREAM act has released another killer:
They are part of the “Democrat” subset. As are psychopaths, the criminally insane, child molesters and homosexuals . . .
“Driver fled the scene” is illegal alien behavior. Maybe a dreamer?missnry splits the difference between Muslim and black:
Obama Brotherhood member???Progov allows that this might just be revenge for Zimmerman:
I'll take door number 2, a “muzzie”ErnBatavia knows what The Pot does to young people:
Then again, it could be another disgruntled “I'm Trayvon”
Either way, the absence of ANY hint to the perps description has been eradicated from the story. What did the eye witnesses say he looked like?
Given as this was Venice Beach, it could just be a stoner druggie.jimbo123 found a video of the white guy, though he's not quite able to see into reality as of yet:
Looks like a Muzzie to me.livius knows ANYONE can be a Muslim:
He does look like a sort of standard model young white guy of no particularly identifiable ethnic group.A_perfect_lady notes that this crime is a cut above what Muslims do:
There’s nothing that prevents him from being a Muslim convert or even from a traditionally Muslim European group (such as Bosnian) or even Chechen, some of whom are very fair skinned.
Oh, they brag once they’re caught, but they don’t usually turn themselves in. Once I heard he’d done that, I figured “garden variety crazy,” although I’d still like to know more.
Later, there's a thread trying to reintegrate with reality: Where is Nathan Louis Campbell's mug shot? [Vanity]. It's mostly arguing about proper Internet sleuthing, but also has thread starter:
Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America trying really hard:
Kinda weird that Colorado had an alert out for a possible terrorist attack at Catholic churches, then it turns out this guy is from Colorado. How does a transient get a new car? Or, did he find a car with keys in the ignition? It has paper plates. Was this guy ‘hired’ by terrorists, gubmint or one of those white converts to Islam? Maybe a meth withdrawal?And by next month, they'll never talk about it, but vaguely remember that one Muslim/black who plowed into a crowd with a car, and they'll still complain that the press not reporting color means it's one of Obama's sons...
I wonder how other countries view our permanently aggrieved class and their crazy-ass blogs. I know they read them; I just wonder how they discuss it amongst themselves. We didn't have things like Free Republic in the early 20th century when Hitler and Stalin and Mussolini were going berserk in Europe, but just imagine the gold mine of crazy if we did. Now we have Free Republic, and it's a permanent electronic record of how a part of the USA melted down into paranoid dementia and stayed there. Frankly, it's the only good thing I can see coming out of the NSA intrusion into our privacy. Please preserve in concrete all the loony hatred of these people for future generations, so that we have proof it didn't abruptly end at the conclusion of the Civil War. Thank you, Jim Robinson! You've done decent people a service by archiving the neo-confederate and neo-nazi decline of the once great United States of America in electronic form, for eternity. Gracias.
ReplyDeleteI'd agree Stalin was a darling of the left, Hitler though was definitely the darling of the far right in America. If you don't believe me look up father Coughlin radio transmission. The right was isolationist because it sympathized with the Nazis
DeleteBefore Hitler's rise, fascism was a staple of even the moderate right, just look up Winston's admiration for Mussolini
I love how rightards still try to resurrect that long-debunked talking point about how Hitler and Stalin were leftists, but don't provide any credible evidence of it (as if there ever was). It's just one of those arguments they repeat to each other in their echo chamber, but once they leave it, find that it falls like a house of cards.
DeleteYou just hate historical facts that much, don't you? As I said, I love the delusions of RWNJs like yourself. It makes me smile to think that you actually believe what you say.
ReplyDeleteFinding this took 10 minutes:
ReplyDelete"So not only does he merely state without any justification that he is a socialist, he makes it clear that his policy is not a socialist one but a racial and colonial one. So Hitler does not at all expound on the socialist statement, but he goes into detail on Lebensraum, which makes it clear that there is no real socialism behind his 'socialist' statement but there is to his expansionary and racist policies."
http://historyandpolitics77.blogspot.com/2011/03/we-are-socialists-debunked.html
So you should have no trouble proving him wrong, then. Right?
DeleteHere are some snippets from the Nazi Party's platform:
Delete"7. We demand that the state be charged first with providing the opportunity for a livelihood and way of life for the citizens. If it is impossible to sustain the total population of the State, then the members of foreign nations (non-citizens) are to be expelled from the Reich."
"11. Abolition of unearned (work and labour) incomes. Breaking of rent-slavery."
"13. We demand the nationalization of all (previous) associated industries (trusts)."
"14. We demand a division of profits of all heavy industries."
"15. We demand an expansion on a large scale of old age welfare."
http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/25points.asp
So, what exactly is "right-wing" about that, you wannabe pseudo-intellectual motherfucker ? The peanuts in my shit are smarter than you.
And just how many of those tenets did he keep once elected, hmmm?
DeleteAnd by the way, these sound very right-wing:
5. Whoever has no citizenship is to be able to live in Germany only as a guest, and must be under the authority of legislation for foreigners.
7. We demand that the state be charged first with providing the opportunity for a livelihood and way of life for the citizens. If it is impossible to sustain the total population of the State, then the members of foreign nations (non-citizens) are to be expelled from the Reich.
8. Any further immigration of non-citizens is to be prevented. We demand that all non-Germans, who have immigrated to Germany since the 2 August 1914, be forced immediately to leave the Reich.
10. The first obligation of every citizen must be to work both spiritually and physically. The activity of individuals is not to counteract the interests of the universality, but must have its result within the framework of the whole for the benefit of all Consequently we demand:
18. We demand struggle without consideration against those whose activity is injurious to the general interest. Common national criminals, usurers, Schieber and so forth are to be punished with death, without consideration of confession or race.
Freeper troll, you got to understand that right wing and left wing mean different things in different periods.
DeleteOriginally left wing meant pro-limited government and pro-capitalism while right wing meant big government absolute monarchy.
Within the context of the time, the Nazis were definitely considered right wing, again just look how if positioned himself in the 1933 election.
Lastly do you remember how the saying went? First they came for the....
Answer this to me freeper troll, during the German 1933 election, guess on which side did the German conservatives align themselves?
ReplyDeleteAlso read up on Georg Ritter von Schönerer, the ideological founder of Nazism.
He's view definitely sound right wing
Yeah, Hitler read Ayn Rand, even though The Fountainhead wasn't published until 1943 and Atlas Shrugged in 1957. But do tell me again how being a dictator means being a socialist. This is very entertaining.
ReplyDeleteAnd yes, Hitler put "socialist" in his party name because it was popular, not because he actually believed in socialism.
1.) We know white people do bad things: we know because the media reports it. What we don't know is that blacks, muslims, and illegals do bad things too. We don't know because the media downplays it. Our critique is mostly of the media.
ReplyDelete2.) Hitler campaigned as a socialist (whether he was one or not) because he knew that way he'd get the Idiot Vote. Socialists vote for whoever promises them free goodies. It worked for Hitler, Castro, Chavez, Obama... it works every time. They vote, and then bitch later that he didn't deliver. No shit.
1. You really think black crime isn't reported? Or Muslims?!
DeleteBecause somehow everyone knows about it, despite your imaginary media secrecy.
And minority crime is featured in many fictional shows, from The Wire to Homeland.
So at the very least you are seriously overstating your case.
2. Your knowledge of why people vote seems to border on the telepathic. It isn't just people on the government dole who vote for Dems, dude.
And Hitler? Ran as a nationalist authoritarian. Saying you'll do good things for people who support you isn't socialism, it's politics.
@Anon, There's nothing I can add to what Ozy said, but I would like to ask you why you think that Obama is a socialist? What policies has he implemented or does he favor that means he's a socialist? Is it Obamacare, which was favored by Republicans from the time The Heritage Foundation thought it up in 1994 up until 2009 that gives private insurance companies millions of new customers? Or is it that he favors higher taxes for the wealthiest people just like Bill Clinton did? And if that's it, then where is the line between 36% and 39% where we cross into socialism?
Delete1. I agree entirely with Ozy
Delete2. Hitler ran as a conservative nationalist in the 1933 election. His two opponents, Otto Wels and Ernst Thalman, ran as a socialist and a as a communist respectively. Although in some of his earlier speeches he decried finance and the banking system, he still got the conservative vote.