A judge says that Oklahoma cannot target Sharia Law as super extra illegal. Freepers presume this means Sharia Law is Constitutional. Oh, and the judge is a black female. Federal Judge + Female + Black + Islam = primo crazytown.
marron preemptively declares a double standard:
You see, if you want to live according to Christian principles, its a violation of the famous separation of church and state clause that everyone finds hidden between the lines of the constitution. But if you want to impose Sharia, thats jake.rfreedom4u loves the misogyny:
Outlawing sharia, that violates the separation of church and state because as we understand, under sharia, the religion *is* the state.
Corruption, thy name is Democrat.
How about we partially institute sharia law?raybbr senses gayness:
Moochelle and Hildabeast and Piglosi need to wear burkas!
No mention of a male spouse anywhere on the web.Regulator doesn't stop at gayness:
How interesting.The Truth Will Make You Free does not believe in the US Constitution:
A Lesbian Black Muslim?
Ruling that the establishment of a regime of Sharia law cannot be prohibited?
How interesting.
Since when does a FEDERAL judge have any jurisdiction over an OKAHOMA vote of the people?RB156 knows Muslims are raping all over Europe!
I find it hilarious when liberals (and RINOs like fatass Christie) try to lecture conservatives about how we’re just being “paranoid” about the application of Sharia. This is ALREADY HAPPENING in Europe! “Sharia courts” effectively making rape and murder legal if you identify as Muslim.Slambat's gut tells him to blame Obama.
Most likely this decision was handed to the judge by
the DOJ. This has the smell of Obama all over it, you
know against the will of the people. No one was brought
up on charges or committed income tax evasion before the
16th amendment was supposedly ratified. This decision is
bunk.
Republican baby play gets thwarted again.
ReplyDeleteFree Republicans throw the predictable tantrum.
What's the matter - are you worried about competition with your brand of hate? Sharia law (and every other religious law) is already unconstitutional. Thank God. So calm down.
DeleteNo, I didn't. Like I said earlier, Freepers only hear what they want to hear. That's why most decent Americans shun people like you, and why you are relegated to inferior late-90s era websites like Freerepublic to feel at home somewhere. To people like you, being steeped in rage all day every day equates with "virtue."
DeleteThis hip-hop thread was not as full of racist craziness as I might have imagined, but comment 8 was a tad dramatic
ReplyDeletehttp://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3057062/posts#8
Yeah - even GeronL doesn't seem to be trying.
DeleteOmg the al jazeera america hysteria is just getting warmed up over at the freep treehouse and on Glenn Beck's site. talk about paranoid and hypocritical !
ReplyDeleteBeck is just jealous and mad because he has been having problems getting cable companies to pick up The Blaze. He never called for boycotts before but now all of a sudden he's dropping big hints that people should get rid of cable.
ReplyDeletethe famous separation of church and state clause that everyone finds hidden between the lines of the constitution.
ReplyDeleteEveryone including Thomas Jefferson, who came up with the phrase. But what is Jefferson's opinion, and Madison's, and decades of Supreme Court decisions, compared to the pet theories of angry FReepers?
A Lesbian Black Muslim?
Ruling that the establishment of a regime of Sharia law cannot be prohibited?
If anything, it makes too much sense!
I really doubt that's what the judge said. Freepers hear what they think they hear - doesn't much matter what you say to them.
DeleteThanks, Oz. I gotta say, my favorite bit of crazy in that thread came from elkfersupper who said:
ReplyDeleteBrings home my "no chicks" rule when it comes to folks seeking political office, appointments or judgeships.
Chicks are insane 25% of the time and subject to twisting off 100% of the time.
I love it when FReepers like our pet troll get upset that normal people refuse to join them in their sad little world of nonstop fear and outrage.
ReplyDeleteIt'd be pretty silly to be angry and paranoid 24/7 even if Sharia law were a serious threat in the USA. But of course, it isn't. As all sane people know.
And seriously...all FR's tough talk aside, who but a total coward would get so angry about people refusing to live in fear of imaginary threats?
I can understand the fear and outrage bit.
DeleteWas born in a time when "people didn't lock their doors" and I mean that as total truth. Recall my Dad spending 4 hours looking for the front door key when a couple of cons broke out of the local penitentiary. That door had never been locked in the 7 years we had lived there.
The world has changed (moved on, if you are a DT fan) and, yes, it is frightening. What we learned as kids no longer applies. Who wants to think about things or look at evidence?
My Dad - who is also an avid reader here - is over 80 now and says if you don't learn, you might as well climb in you box and be buried.
lol anecdotes = true everywhere
DeleteI blame the "In Cold Blood" guy!
DeleteI do, at least, know his name.
ReplyDelete