Nolij

Freeper critical thinking on the latest global warming study:

sergeantdave is all about shooting the messenger:

I didn’t know that hyperbole was a scientific discipline at MIT. Wonder if any students there can predict the direction of a stone dropped from a tower. MIT needs to be redefined from a university to a kook cult. Reading chicken entrails will soon be a required course.

cradle of freedom casts a wider net - it's not MIT, it's all scientists!

The advocacy journalists are all college buddies of the advocacy scientists, and they are all lefties out to save the world from evil capitalism.

VanShuyten knows how science works:

"The new research involved 400 runs of the model with each run using slight variations in input parameters, selected so that each run has about an equal probability of being correct based on present observations and knowledge."

So each run has about 0.25% chance of being correct?

I hope VanShuyten's perfect deterministic world doesn't get too boring!

SunkenCiv continues the trend of not engaging the science, but adds death fantasies:

I think the gallows built to hang these global warming wastoids a dozen at a time should be constructed of recycled lumber.

TurtleUp has a solution:

I agree. If I'm still around in fifty years, I'm going to move 30 miles north to compensate for the warmer climate where I am now (yep, 30 miles will balance out the entire forecast warming!). Or did you mean move someplace other than this warming planet?

Yes, and if everyone just moved 30 miles north, there would be no problems! Also move inland, and hope there are no storms.

kc8ukw ends things with a whopper:

Behold the power of the modern media. The average man has not, could not, experience anything that would actually indicate to him that the globe is warming because of his activities. Yet many believe it.

Other media hoaxes: the germ theory of disease, atomic theory and all of social science.