Any victory will do

You'd think that between the EU conservative victory, and the NY senate flipping Republican, Freepers wouldn't need to gin up another victory. But see none of those are directly tied to Obama. So when the Supreme Court holds implementation of the Chrysler bankruptcy pending its ruling, Freepers cling to it like a drowning man on the last piece of driftwood.

technically right is a good example of how Freepers see this as a bit different from all those rulings against Bush:

Take that, and that, and that, and THAT!! (sounds of Zero’s floppy ears getting boxed by Buzzy Ginsburg)

rcrngroup also has a bit of crowing to do, though it's more of a "ten minutes of hate" thing.

But the other thing I want to comment on is that 0booooooombashiite is an ugly, evil looking parasite!!!!

Soooo uuuugly!

Scythian really sees this as some sort of climactic battle:

UAW Death Sqaud Teams and Bus Loads of ACORN Teams are heading to Indiana now to help explain things to the populace

UAW Death Squads? Lest you think this is a joke, like 5 people reply with "bring them on!"

Brad from Tennessee sees Chrysler's secured creditors as the linchpin of the Republic

It will be a twist if Judge Ginsberg is remembered 100 years from now—in song, stories, poems and statues in parks—as the justice, who at the last minute, issued the stay that stopped the mad dash toward totalitarianism and preserved the Union.

Also amusing is what people think the Supreme Court does. For instance, FreepShop1 is a bit unclear on the subject:

God help us all if they uphold Sotomoron.

Cause the SCOTUS has the last say on who gets to be in the club!

savedbygrace knows when the Supreme Court strikes down Presidential action, someone goes to jail!

Id the Court hears the case, and if they ultimately rule the use of TARP funds for auto makers was not authorized, somebody should actually go to jail for misappropriation of funds.

If the CEO of a corporation had done something similar with borrowed funds, he would do time.

In this case, would it be Turbo Tax Timmy? Or would it be an impeachable offense for The Won?

Finally, the general "us versus them" mentality is nowhere more evident than here. Thus, you get people like Red Steel, who think if you disagree with Obama you must be with the Freepers:

Did she see the light or something? She got a clue?

bustinchops looks for a motivation for this bewildering break with the strawman he built up:

Well, I presume Ginsburg is Jewish.

Maybe that’s why she stuck it to them.

Cause Jews don't support Obama.

Luckily, Rome2000 sets them straight:

In a Dictatorship, the law is whatever the Dictator says it is.

Ginsburg is merely playing a game to give the appearance that that the SCOTUS is looking at this objectively.

No way she gives it to the full court.

She is a democrat.

This "the Enemy only does things I agree with to fake me out" is becoming more and more common as Obama's moderation becomes more and more evident.