Friday, August 21, 2009

Fat Ass MaBelle Michelle!!!

I never got why MaBelle was an insult. I think it's a very sweet Beatles song.

Michelle Obama wears shorts. Freepers, always all about womens' appearance, go into a tizzy.

patriot08 is reliving high school!

For God’s sake, Ms Hussein, cover up those tree trunk bow legs! You’re a disgrace.
You and the usuper desecrate the White House by your very presence there.

TexasFreeper2009 seems to have a weak stomach:
She would fit right in inside any walmart or housing project in America.

Makes me proud to have such a lady representing us in the white house... *barf*

She surely is one of the greats... Lady Dianna... Princess Grace... and now Bag Lady! *barf*
Same guy a bit later:

Hillary always looked like a clown... but at least she looked like a well dressed clown.

SharpRightTurn has a valid question:

Wow, not a good look. Why is this being inflicted on the American people?

squarebarb has pulled some analysis out of his ass!

The bama ladies are dedicated to that fashion called anti-fashion.

It’s the trendy anti-glamor look. It’s been going on a while.

Whatever is fashionable, has a finished look, is put-together, polished, co-ordinated, etc., do just the opposite.

Clunky big shoes, dull colors combined with really loud splashed colors, anything that looks dumpy dull and lumpy, combined with garish colors, that’s the anti-fashion fashion.

As I say, it’s been going on for a while. In certain quarters. Progressives love the look.

MissDairyGoodnessVT isn't projecting at all:
Machete Machelle could give a hoot about making a nice impression as First Lady.

She isn’t known for her graciousness or kindness because she’s been silenced by her husbands people due to her big mouth and even bigger ego;especially thinking being FL as “job” and wanting a salary.

She doesn’t care about being gracious,dressing with taste or style or even trying to act with decorum (lets her emotions show on her face all the time—— can’t smile to smile)Setting a table with mis-matched WH china for an important WH dinner is her idea of a statement and that statement is: I’m here, I’m in your face, I’m going to do what I want , when I want and I don’t give a rats a$$ what you or anyone else thinks.
Right Wing Assault isn't satisfied with the racism just simmering below the surface,and dredges it right up:

Daddy, who dug that big hole?

Well, honey, I don’t think anyone dug it. I think Allah...

Momma jumps in:

Honey, the white man made the black slaves do that so they could take a vacation to look at it. That’s what Revrun Wright told me.

18 comments:

  1. every single one of those bastards better have closets full of the latest designs and styles from all the hottest designers' fall lines... swear to god.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You know that if she wore nothing but the most elegant clothes all the time they would call her "elitist" and say she could never connect with the common people. On the other hand, if a Republican First Lady wore the exact same things Michelle does, we would hear nothing but praise from them about how pretty and classy she is. Of course a Republican First Lady would also never be black. Not in a million years.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yeah, keep telling yourself that, Anonymous. You're just mad that we libs were right about Bush all along and are bad-mouthing Obama to try to do the same thing with him. It would be nice if you were arguing anything approaching facts. Democrats need some credible opposition.

    ReplyDelete
  4. To Euphgeek,
    What "facts" about Bush, where you right about? Bush = Hilter, Bush went to war for Oil, Bush read a pet goat on 9/11, Bush stole 2000 etc....etc. Now dear O is exactly following Bush's anti-terror policies. Libtards never said anything sensible about W for the past 8 years. Did you libtards ever say anything approaching facts for the past 8 years, look at yourself before mouthing off, lib.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Oh, I don't know, how about Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 and had no WMDs, Bush broke international laws by torturing prisoners, tax cuts for the rich don't boost the economy, The government should never have intervened in the Terri Schiavo case, Bush's handling of Katrina was a disaster, the Department of Homeland Security politicized the terror alerts, Bush ignored all signs of a pending attack up to 9/11 (and yes, he did continue reading "The Pet Goat" after he was informed of the attacks, are you actually disputing that?).

    The arguments you listed are nothing but strawmen. You sound like you purposely ignored real liberal arguments just like President Bush did. For eight long years we tried to tell you the facts but you just kept calling us "unpatriotic" and "terrorist sympathizers." Yet the layers keep getting peeled away and we learn more and more each day how right we libs were. None of this really surprises us, you know. We're just watching as stories that should have been investigated at the time by the "liberal" MSM come out one after the other.

    And if Obama is "exactly following Bush's anti-terror policies," that means you must agree with him, right? He must not be as much of a lefty as you on the right make him out to be.

    ReplyDelete
  6. To Euphgeek,

    tax cuts for the rich don't boost the economy

    But the Great O's porkulus is helping the economy a lot. Unemployment is down to 4%, economy is growing a healthy 2.5-3%....Oh wait

    Oh, I don't know, how about Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 and had no WMDs

    Fine, actually I was against Iraq from the start, it was FUBAR and Bush II should have listened to his daddy.

    The government should never have intervened in the Terri Schiavo case

    So, a ditbag like Michael Schiavo pulling the plug on his wife, so that he can marry his mistress is fine with you? Oh, gotta accept the "alternate" lifestyle.

    Bush's handling of Katrina was a disaster

    But, Nagin and Blanco (both-D)'s handling of Katrina was 5-star par excellent, right?

    Bush ignored all signs of a pending attack up to 9/11

    But, Clinton did such a fine job of hunting Osama down, we all know that.

    And if Obama is "exactly following Bush's anti-terror policies," that means you must agree with him, right

    Then Obama should have STFU and not criticized Bush relentlessly. When Obama tortures suspects and keeps Gitmo open, why don't libs scream bloody murder like they did for the past 8 years. Typical double standards.


    You sound like you purposely ignored real liberal arguments just like President Bush did.

    Real Liberal arguments like Buck Fush, Bushliter etc...etc? Yup "Real" arguments, sorry if us dumb conservative hicks could not understand uber-smart liberal logic.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Yes, the economy is slowly coming back (you expected unemployment to instantly rebound?), Michael Schiavo didn't need his wife to be dead to marry his mistress (in fact, he was offered a million dollars to walk away and turned it down), Bush was the one who refused to send federal help to New Orleans after Blanco repeatedly requested it and Clinton did just as good of a job at hunting down OBL as Bush did.

    Go ahead and name one suspect that Obama has tortured. If you can, I'll scream against him as much as I did against Bush.

    And thanks once again for proving my point that you ignored real liberal arguments just like President Bush did and only focused on liberal strawman arguments.

    ReplyDelete
  8. To Euphgeek,
    Yes, the economy is slowly coming back

    Where? Umemployment is up, not down and while I know that employment lags in a recovery, there are no "green shoots" that O's supporters like to trot out.

    Michael Schiavo didn't need his wife to be dead to marry his mistress

    Then he need not have pulled the plug on her, he was itching to have her "euthanized" for quite some time, why is that?

    Bush was the one who refused to send federal help to New Orleans after Blanco repeatedly requested it

    Why must "federal help" arrive? Why did not Nagin and Blanco do anything? Why must Daddy Bush save New Orleans, and if Katrina was a disaster, why was the blame hung exclusively on Bush by the libs?

    Clinton did just as good of a job at hunting down OBL as Bush did.

    Clinton did such a good job that OBL was able to plot an operating like 9/11 without anyone ever knowing,LOL.

    Go ahead and name one suspect that Obama has tortured. If you can, I'll scream against him as much as I did against Bush.

    Obama has continued extraordinary rendition of Bush after promising to stop them during the campaign,surely people will be tortured under the great O's watch.

    http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2009/02/obama-administr.html


    and you too name one suspect that Bush tortured, before asking me to do the same.

    And thanks once again for proving my point that you ignored real liberal arguments just like President Bush did and only focused on liberal strawman arguments

    After throwing on strawmen for the past 8 years, libs are sure an expert on strawmen.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Unemployment is a lagging indicator of economic recovery. And remember, this is still Bush's economy, just like 2001 was still Clinton's economy.

    Michael Schiavo didn't "need" to pull the plug on Terri, he just wanted to fulfill his wife's end of life directive.

    Bush did such a good job of capturing OBL that he's still running around free to plot another operation like 9/11.

    I knew you couldn't name a single person that Obama had tortured. I can name at least one person that Bush had tortured: Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.

    And thanks again for admitting you only listened to liberal strawmen.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Unemployment is a lagging indicator of economic recovery. And remember, this is still Bush's economy, just like 2001 was still Clinton's economy.

    So you agree that the O's porkulus has not accomplished squat.

    Michael Schiavo didn't "need" to pull the plug on Terri, he just wanted to fulfill his wife's end of life directive.

    He wanted to pull the plug on his wife, for quite some time, and according to Terri's parents,she did not want death by dehydration and was a Roman Catholic.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terri_Schiavo_case#Rehabilitation_efforts

    Bush did such a good job of capturing OBL that he's still running around free to plot another operation like 9/11.

    Bush did such a good job,that there have been no 9/11s in 8 years,a great feat considering that the first WTC bombing, Khobar Towers bombing, USS Cole and the Embassy bombings all took place on Clinton's watch

    I knew you couldn't name a single person that Obama had tortured. I can name at least one person that Bush had tortured: Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.

    So getting information from a low-life terrorist is bad? Maybe the great O would have invited Khalid for a tea-session. And conviniently you glossed over the link that shows that Obama intends to continue Bush's rendition policies, after he criticized them on the campaign trail. I do not need to name one person that Obama tortured, the fact that he intends to continue Bush era policy of holding detainess without due process is enough.

    And thanks again for admitting you only listened to liberal strawmen.

    Because I shot down all your other "true" arguments.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Just because it's still Bush's economy doesn't mean that the stimulus didn't accomplish anything.

    What Terri's parents think she may have wanted is irrelevant. Michael was her husband and had the final say since Terri was unable to have it. And it still doesn't change the fact that the government shouldn't have interfered in the case.

    Bush did such a poor job that there was one 9/11 in the last 8 years. He ignored all evidence that al Qaeda was plotting it, including ignoring a memo titled "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US."

    Torture doesn't get good information from a low-life terrorist, it gets false information. Just ask John McCain who admitted that he gave out names of the starting lineup of the Green Bay Packers to his torturers instead of the names of his platoon. And thanks for admitting that it's wrong to hold detainees without due process.

    You've shot down exactly zero of my arguments. You've only shot down the strawman arguments you've created. Thanks again for admitting that they are the only arguments you listen to.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Just because it's still Bush's economy doesn't mean that the stimulus didn't accomplish anything.

    What did it accomplish, other than the balloning fiscal deficit? Care to explain?

    What Terri's parents think she may have wanted is irrelevant. Michael was her husband and had the final say since Terri was unable to have it. And it still doesn't change the fact that the government shouldn't have interfered in the case.

    That would be true, had Michael been a nice guy. Unfortunately since he is a dirtbag, the govt was forced to step in.

    Bush did such a poor job that there was one 9/11 in the last 8 years. He ignored all evidence that al Qaeda was plotting it, including ignoring a memo titled "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US."

    And what did Clinton do throughout the 90s, when the AQ struck at will? Bush quickly learnt from 9/11 unlike Clinton

    Torture doesn't get good information from a low-life terrorist, it gets false information.

    And what is "torture?", Did we pull out KSM's fingernails?, no just persauded him with psychological tactics. Once again, you ignore the fact that Bush era rendition is being continued by Obama? If this Bush policy is so bad, why is Obama keeping it alive?

    And thanks for admitting that it's wrong to hold detainees without due process

    Which Obama like Bush is keeping as anti-terror policy, however no howls of outrage from the left this time.

    You've shot down exactly zero of my arguments. You've only shot down the strawman arguments you've created. Thanks again for admitting that they are the only arguments you listen to.

    Umm no, unless you cannot read, I have been responding point-by-point to your claims.Thanks again, for admitting that like all libs you can only respond with ad-hominems.

    ReplyDelete
  13. 1. Figuring out what would have happened if there were no stimulus is damn near impossible. Maybe we'd be in worse straits, maybe not. Counterfactuals are tricky like that.

    2. The government mandate against dirtbags proves a bit much. Arguably, insurance agencies are dirtbags (they deny a lot of people care), as are people who argue politics on the internet.

    3. The previous domestic terror attack before 9-11 was the 1993 bombing of the WTC. That's 8 years. If you want to bring the "Cole" into it, then you also have to bring in the bombings in Spain and London.

    I'm not convinced any of these incidents were preventable by anyone. Counterfactual hypotheses raise their head again ("if Bush had been in power instead of Clinton etc. etc.)

    4. Torture is, at heart, a moral question. By getting caught up in arguments about effectiveness and definitions you lose.

    5. The far left still howls at Obama about Gitmo, but a lot of people have shut up about it alluva sudden. And they should be yelling at him.

    In short, I think Anon has a point on this as well. Personally, I think the lack of moderate cries is more due to Obama's rhetoric being more in line with what they want to hear than any blind partisanship. Sometimes putting a cherry on the shit sandwich is all.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Ozy did an excellent job in his responses to you, so there's no need for me to repeat them. But I will say that it's too soon to declare that the stimulus did nothing for the economy. Unlike you, I made no claims about its failure or success.

    I have also been responding point by point to you. You have not shot down a single one of my arguments. And if there's a question as to who is using "ad hominem," then look at who has been using language like "libtard" and who hasn't.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Ozy and Euph,
    Good points. Not much name calling and abuses :), unlike most threads on FR and Kos.

    ReplyDelete
  16. :-) I was impressed with you guys too.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Thanks. If only all political arguments could be civil. :-)

    ReplyDelete
  18. how many lobsters does she eat a day?

    ReplyDelete