Hillary looms on the horizon. Freepers are trying to find a way to hate her for what they see as her main attributes - being female - while not alienating the other women of the world. It's not working.
Sarah Barracuda just yells about abortion and has done with it.
To libs, a way to a woman’s heart is through sucking out a baby out of the womb..nothing makes libs happier than seeing babies being slaughtered in abortion clinicsExpatGator smugly points out that liberals sometimes get divorces, while he himself has not.
Yeah, their party is made up of faggots, dykes, muzzies, blacks, bitter female divorcees, and the misguided youth of this country. You ever witnessed the average relationship in those communities?Finny hates women having opportunities:
On the other hand we have us, of whom I am one. I’ve been married 20 years, to my first and only wife.
They claim to understand women better than us......
I hate to say it, but we've become a country of timid, traumatized men, and who's damned fault is that? Grrrrrrrrr. The government (of course), the Left, and women. No Fault Divorce, where women overwhelmingly have gotten the spoils of parental authority for the past two generations, has done more to rape boys and men in America than anything, and it was powered and enabled by the left and government. The boy sees his father an emasculated slave, and wonders what he has to look forward to as a dad himself.Finny follows up about an old memory that she's still pissed off about:
I'd rather vote for men. I'm almost a misogynist, though I'm a woman. I love Thatcher, I love Palin. I'd vote for both. But on balance, I prefer men. It saddens me to see that in America today, THE WOMEN are the ones carrying the Limited Government Conservative banner so high -- where the hell are the guys? But I know they're there, I'm just bitching.
Hey, I'm female.
I think that in a pop culture where women can get away with murder, literally, figures like Palin are a God-sent blessing. Example: HW Bush silenced by pinhead Katie Couric, who scolded him condescendingly on her show once for his involvement or support, I don't remember which, of tobacco farming. A World War II veteran! And her, a brat young enough to be his daughter! I like to think I'd have yanked her off that set poste haste if I'd been on the scene, and slapped her silly.Her profile is mostly about how she was an asshole in 6th grade.
Bush was a gentleman, he could not swat down the miserable gnat Couric because she was female. Had she tried such a trick with Thatcher, or Palin in a live forum, she'd have been sliced to ribbons. Girls fight dirty. Hillary would do the same thing, take advantage of a gentleman's honor. My dream 2016 ticket would be Palin vs Hillary. It would be hilarious.
ffusco - the GOP is to manly to care about women: The GOP doesn’t understand Women because they’re Men. Actual Men. Talisker notes that liberal women want to kill all conservative women:
I guess there are no women conservatives or Republicans.
Oh wait, I'm sorry, there are, but they don't exist. You see, Democrat women don't disagree with others, or have discussions, or debate, or consider alternative viewpoints.
No, no, no. These peace-loving, baby and families oriented paragons have a much better method of dealing with disagreement:
They Erase You.
So you see, there are no Conservative or Republican women. They don't exist. Right now, it's figurative. Such women are shunned and not acknowledged, literally denied their humanity and existence.
But as history has repeatedly shown, that's not where progressives leave things. Oh no. Because some sunny day they'll be able to ACTUALIZE their dream of "peace" and actually make all those disagreeing women... disappear.
And then liberal women can say there really, actaully are no conservative or Republican women in America, just like the president of Iran looks the whole world in the eyes and says quite truthfully that there are no homosexuals in Iran.
You think the same females that can chop up a living breathing 9 month old baby into bloody pieces and call it freedom won't do this? LOL! Dream on!
They DREAM of it.
I do wonder what happened to some of these people.
ReplyDeleteHad a fairly conservative upbringing - Dad said "jump" you asked how high, Mom said "jump" and you did it at once and hoped it were high enough! Where did that respect (and fear, for that matter) go?
I can understand bits of it. Hard divorces, older women looking at the much better conditions for women now-days and resenting it. Doesn't make it right.
Slightly disjointed - not had coffee as yet! :)
Where did that respect (and fear, for that matter) go?
ReplyDeleteDon't know where and when you grew up, EC, but I grew up in CA in the late 1960s / early 1970s and I can say that upbringings these days seem to be a LOT stricter than they were for me and my peers. People seem to me to be far more authoritarian and paranoid...standard parenting in my day would be considered negligent today (and rightly so, in some cases).
It's also true, though, that among couples I know, the gender roles are pretty equal. The dad isn't some sort of miniature version of God, ruling everyone with an iron fist. Duties are more likely to be shared, and authority is more likely to be backed up with reason than with "Because I said so, that's why."
That said, my wife, who's a behavioral therapist, would argue that parenting today still tends to be too permissive in terms of giving children choices that they don't need and power they can't necessarily handle. On the other hand, she'd also argue that the dad-centric model that so many conservatives see as the natural order was also seriously flawed because it was too arbitrary and witlessly authoritarian. She'd argue for a firm, fair, consistent, rational approach...and at least from where I'm sitting, parents these days are a lot closer to that basic ideal than they were when I was a kid.
As for where the "fear" went, I don't know...but good riddance. It warps people's brains, in my opinion, and doesn't make for good kids or good citizens. Not speaking about you personally, but most conservatives I've known have been inordinately fearful people and as a result I think they tend to overestimate its developmental importance for children, as well as its effectiveness as a means of social control. YMMV.
Nah - you make sense.
DeleteWe grew up in the same sort of era - I think I have a few years on you, but not many!
Dad centric - I missed that by a few years, I think, or I was just incredibly lucky in my parents. Mom was not one to use the line "wait til your father gets home." I pulled some stupid shit (rather frequently, kids do test boundaries) and she'd deal with it. Usually painfully.
I agree about the fear thing. It is better gone. Not the way we raised our kids - they knew the rules, which had reasons explained to them as soon as they were old enough to understand. They could discuss the rules and ask for exceptions (for example, our eldest did not have to do breakfast for his sisters because he had a delivery round.) but we would talk things over all the time.
One thing we insisted on was a proper, sit down dinner with the kids. Eat, talk about the day, tell jokes - the usual stuff. No distractions. After dinner, well, they'd do homework. Ask a ton of questions too! It got tiring at times, you pulled a full days work then have to deal with a ton of questions, but was well worth it.
That sounds wonderful, EC. My home was much the same - our parents always employed reason with us first. I don't remember much of any punishment ever being meted out. The worse thing in our house was disapproval; our parents expected us to behave and talk a certain way, and when we let them down, we could feel it. Kids need rules, naturally, but they will live up to meet your expectations if you make those expectations clear. Beatings and such would have seemed like aberrant behavior in our house.
Delete[i]"nothing makes libs happier than seeing babies being slaughtered in abortion clinics"[/i]
ReplyDeleteSorry, but what would really make liberals far happier is better sexual education and even easier access to birth control. Most pro-choice people don't celebrate abortion, they just want it is an option.
[i]Bush was a gentleman, he could not swat down the miserable gnat Couric because she was female. Had she tried such a trick with Thatcher, or Palin in a live forum, she'd have been sliced to ribbons.[/i]
Maybe Thatcher, but Couric asked St. Sarah a fairly simple question and she froze. I doubt (especially when it is "off script") that Mrs. Palin would have anything witty to say to Couric. It is funny that Finny even uses this example when it is pretty well known that the Court Jester (according to the Freepers) had to back off a bit during the vice presidential debate in '08 against Palin so he didn't come off like a bully.
Palin lovers keep praising how sassy she is, but that's because she's always delivering a (fairly lame, IMO) scripted monologue in front of a friendly audience. In any dialogue, which have been few and far between, she falls apart and gets bitchy pretty quickly.
DeleteCan you imagine never changing your opinion on anything since you were in the 6th grade?
ReplyDeleteYes, I can imagine, since I found some old classmates via Facebook.
DeleteAt least this guy's got some sharp ideas, right?
ReplyDelete"I'm not at that point with regard to the truly severely disabled. But for the able-bodied (specifically including women who have babies to qualify for aid) my attitude is "work or die", to the point where if a woman has a baby she is unable to support by her own efforts, I would put the kid up for adoption, sterilize her, and tell her to go to work.
48 posted on 3/18/2014 8:13:35 AM by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)"
More PapaBear:
Delete"We donate far more food to feed Arabs in hunger than the super rich Arabs who finance terrorism and hatred in the Middle East and here!
Because they understand that feeding hungry people with no job skills produces a bigger next generation of hungry people with no job skills, until they finally exceed the limit of available charity. Something we in the US do not understand."
"(re: Try more often... starving, bony young ladies, who are so close to dead they cannot even bear children... dressed in black, and unwashed and stinking, and of course, they have usually already been surgically altered so they cannot actually enjoy making love right? Allah demands they have their pleasure center removed surgically to prevent them from ever enjoying sex, married or otherwise.)
A long bath, some food, and some attention to the G spot (which doesn't get cut out) would fix all that."
"I was "nice guy" in my high-school days, didn't get much attention. In college, I put on a bad boy persona and got plenty of attention.
What happened in times past, was that girls HAD TO find a marriageable guy fairly early in the game. Being a single corporate lawyer by day who slept with bikers by night, was not an option. So the girls found a guy who would be a secure husband who the parents would approve of."
"I suspect that a whole bunch of people have decided that going to food pantries frees up money to buy $200 sneakers.
One reason why people on food stamps can be seen buying steak and lobster, is that food pantries allow them to get their basics without using their EBT money."
"A lot of the time, there are no "solutions" (all good effect, no bad effects), only trade-offs (a positive impact here creates a negative impact there).
If bans against child marriage became rigorously enforced there, do you really think girls would uniformly be treated better?"
"Pudgy, unattractive woman finds purpose as a radical. Not an uncommon event. "
"OK, so she's in a situation where no man thinks she's worth risking himself to protect her. She should either get a CCW, find a man and give him a reason to want to protect her, or both.
We all know that if there was a sudden surge in shooting purse snatchers, the Al & Jesse show would be coming to town. Especially if the snatchers work in two-man teams: one unarmed guy to snatch the purse (being unarmed to avoid aggravated robbery charges), and a partner to shoot anybody who gives chase. "
"A woman-run society tends to de-motivate men. The men's attitude becomes "Fine, you want to run things, go ahead. My buddies and I will be off fishing over there. Have fun". They will have little interest in defending the society, or spending lots of work keeping it going.
What inevitably happens then, is that the first man-run society that comes into contact with the woman-run society will conquer it. Which is why, over history, we tend not to see societies where women rule, or even have major influence over decision-making. The (short term) exception is current Western society, which is in the process of being overrun and taken over. "
"(re I am not married and have surpassed the big 40. I wonder why. I have exactly two single female friends over the age of 30 (one is in her 60’s and divorced). I’d rather spend time with my happily married friends or those not desperate for a partner than miserable complaining single women.)
It's not too late, if you still have interest in getting married. You just have to be willing to be open to approaches by guys over 50."
Spotlight needed.
So in PapaBear's utopia who would be the ones taking the children, putting them up for adoption and forcefully sterilizing these women. Would it be the "police state" that he warns about in his tagline? I guess sometimes tyranny is good.
Delete...if a woman has a baby she is unable to support by her own efforts, I would put the kid up for adoption, sterilize her, and tell her to go to work.
DeleteSo, is he going to go find Bristol Palin and sterilize her? I doubt that if Bristol wasn't in a reality TV family, she could have survived on her own "efforts."
http://vikingkitties.blogspot.com/2014/01/friday-spotlight-papabear3625.html
DeleteFuck howd I miss that.
DeleteDon't worry kid. Missed that one too. Funny as hell though.
Delete