Monday, September 19, 2011

Monday potpourri.

nodumbblonde on how she wants a hairy belching President:

Conservative women want... well, MEN... in all their hairy, belching, scratching glory. lol I think we understand that men and women were made to complement each other. We each bring two halves to the table and are (usually) more the better for it. We soften them and they strengthen us.

We want men of strength, dependability, respectability and character, men who aren’t afraid to get their hands dirty and don’t ask of others what they themselves aren’t willing to give. We want men that will stand strong in the face of adversity, men that will stand for truth and right, men that aren’t afraid to lead, to make tough decisions and accept the consequences of those decisions without complaint. We want the other half of ourselves.

Liberal women, for all their talk of tolerance and diversity, want someone EXACTLY like them. (Maybe that explains the prevalence of homosexuality in the liberal world.) They want someone who FEELS and THINKS exactly like they do. Someone who completely UNDERSTANDS them... or at least says they do. They’re looking for a female in a male body, without understanding that you’re then losing half of the equation and half the perspective.

The qualities I would look for in a man to share a life and a family with are the same qualities I look for in a President. Sadly, I’m sure liberal women do the same thing.

Egads, does any of that make any sense at all??? I’m lousy at explaining things. *blush*

Doc Savage is writing Obama fan-fic again:

“Oh Larry,....My luscious Larry Sinclair,...fill me up again Larry, it is I, your love-doll Barack! Save me from Moochella’s bovine thighs Larry.

dirtymac disbelieves all science now:

with the rigidity of ‘scientific thought’ with both evolution and man made global warming I have come to the conclusion that the absolute adherance to these concepts in much more important than science itself. to me scientist have shrunk to the level of carnival gme hucksters. They will support any junk science so long as the grant funding keeps coming in.

muawiyah posts it. Next week a Freeper will report it as fact.

[Michael Moore] is a baby eating Fascist pig.

muawiyah is a champion:
Hey, do you realize I'm one of the FIRST federal employees to retire with a PERFECT ATTENDANCE AWARD.

That's for real.

No one meets my standards! Not even you.
Oh, I believe you came into work every day, if it made you feel so superior. But one of the few? Keep telling yourself that buddy.

rawcatslyentist has a new on on Bill Clinton:
Not to mention his Ark Gov daze of selling prisoner AIDS blood to the Canadians.

The death toll of that is staggering and ongoing.

That there Billy Jeff is one evil sumbeach, and his little dawg too!
BradyLS remembers when life was good, if you were white and male and not poor:
I think the zenith of our country was between 1958 and 1964. Before then, we helped people who helped themselves, mostly. After that, we began to let strangers prey on our nation’s bounty and good will.
Track9 thinks we have a tyranny. And the Bible is somehow involved.

I wonder if his teleprompter writers are lifting biblical references.. they really are the epitome of the maxim that goes something like, when a law prohibiting something is used to force people to do exactly what it was intended to prevent, you have reached a working definition of tyranny.

He's talking about the Jobs Recovery Act, so I have no idea.

Glenn thinks it's time to declare victory, commit genocide, and leave Afghanistan:
We've lost Afghanistan. (Not our fault. The place is a rock pile.) Let's kill as many of the mongrels as possible on our way out of the place. While we're at it, let's get out of Pakistan as well.
mogrels?

GBA
has a philosophy:

We essentially live in two worlds at the same time, the natural world and the social construct we’ve built and overlaid upon it.

The natural world plays by The Rules and exists in dynamic balance regardless of what we do.

We can upset the natural world, but sooner or later it returns to business as usual.

The best we can do is figure out what the rules are and then live in harmony with them.

I believe that was the intent of our Founding Fathers and the Constitutional Republic is the construct they created for humanity to thrive in harmony with natural law.

Liberalism/progressivism, like socialism, communism, fascism, etc., is a social construct that does not harmonize with natural law, but rather seeks to impose its will upon it.

Rather than seeing ‘what is’ and living accordingly, liberalism sees it as ‘what is unfair’ and then forces solutions to that which aren’t problems, financed with other people’s money stolen from people who had nothing to do with the problem liberals are trying to solve.
See, anything that disagrees with GBA is unnatural and unbalances us!

No comments:

Post a Comment