Tuesday, December 24, 2013

For the Children

Another little thread whose title made me think it was all predictable that Anonymous pointed me to and turns out to be amazeballs.

The logical conclusion of the crisis style of social conservationism is that we will kill and rape all our children, and criminalize anyone who disagrees. Freepers go there.

ClearCase_guy:
We are becoming Thailand.
Huh. I thought we were Zimbabwe. Progress!

svcw's denial is adorable:
So called homosexual marriage is not accepted, that’s why when the voters are able to vote on the issue it fails.
So called homosexual marriage has been forced on the US by liberal judges.
pepsi_junkie knows gays may seem cute now, but soon they'll TAKE OVER THE PROM!
It's inevitable once you make the argument that it's not fair to judge gays because they didn't choose to be gay. If you accept that argument then it's equally unfair to judge pedophiles or necrophiliacs or any perversion really.

Sure, initially you start with jolly gays elfs like Perez Hilton and Harvey Firestone and Ellen Degenerous the like and say "oh, what's the harm? Besides, they didn't choose to be that way!" Then you move on to something previously unthinkable such as male prom queens and America cheers. The bar just keeps lowering.
jsanders2001 is sure the government is riddled with pedos!
The pedophile officials that the Left keeps putting in office isn’t helping. Of course they seem to want it that way...
Little Ray remembers a time when you could post about how much you disliked gays on the Internet...
Somewhere along the line, speaking out against these things will become illegal. We are already well on the way to that.
Count of Monte Fisto...wow:
Eventually parents will be put in jail if they merely voice their objection to perverts having sex with their kids.

After that parents will be punished if they don't sacrifice their kids to Moloch. I'm not kidding.

The only thing that will stop this is good men with guns.

16 comments:

  1. Never understood the fuss about homosexuals (sorry, I don't use the word gay - I were raised when it meant happy and cheerful).

    It's a sin, sure, but it isn't my sin. Not exactly my problem - got sins of my own to deal with.

    Merry Christmas Ozzie. May you have a good one!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. (sorry, I don't use the word gay - I were raised when it meant happy and cheerful).

      I know, huh? Also, I hate how "cool" used to refer to temperature, but now it has something to do with attitude. And just the other day I heard someone say "wicked," and he mean it in a positive way!

      Kids these days, I swear to God. Don't they know language is never supposed to evolve? Traditional English was good enough for Chaucer, and it's good enough for me. Forsooth.

      Delete
    2. A personal preference on using a word (or not) is a personal preference. Don't say fuck in mixed company either - that also rates your ire?

      Delete
    3. And personal preferences are, on occasion, worthy of comment.

      There's no ire involved, however...just gentle, good-natured mockery. (I refuse to say "playdate" or "mixtape," myself.)

      Delete
    4. I'd stick my tongue out at you :) Mix tape is a perfectly valid word.

      Have a good Christmas! Catch you on the next thread to make fun of!

      Delete
  2. "Count of Monte Fisto" ... ok, even if he/she isn't a poe looking for outrageous freeper comments on gays, that would be the perfect screen name for a trolling poe on FR.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What is the origin or meaning of the term "poe" in this context? I'm not hip with the lingo. Tho' in any context, "count of monte fisto" sure does sound troll-y.

      Delete
    2. Poe's law.

      "Without a blatant display of humor, it is impossible to create a parody of extremism or fundamentalism that someone won't mistake for the real thing"

      Nathan Poe, Not Edgar Allen Poe. Though it is much older than that - he just got the credit.

      Delete
    3. "Poe" is a term for "poser" that has been around for awile.
      "Posers" pretend to be a sympathetic fellow traveler on whatever board they're on, but tend to overplay their persona. This either makes the entire thread look ridiculous or provokes other "real" posters into even more extreme commentary, achieving the same goal.

      Delete
    4. Gracias for filling me in.

      Delete
  3. If you accept that argument then it's equally unfair to judge pedophiles or necrophiliacs or any perversion really.

    If we could somehow get the Right Wing to collectively understand the simple concept of "consent," it would revolutionize American politics. Unfortunately, that seems to be about as plausible as perpetual motion. The vast majority of these idiots will go to their graves not understanding the difference between fucking a kid (wrong!) and consensual gay sex between adults (of no concern to any straight person who has an actual life!).

    ReplyDelete
  4. Who to trust, 6 doctors' unanimous medical conclusion or GeronL?

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3105067/posts?page=18#18

    "It has happened occasionally that “brain dead” people have woken up.

    They make mistakes in hospitals too.


    18 posted on 12/24/2013 7:49:56 PM by GeronL"

    Who needs med school when you have a totally normal obsession with kiddie porn?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well...GeronL does seem pretty active for someone who is kinda brain dead. Maybe he has a point.

      Delete
  5. I used to want to be a conservative but I didn't want to spend so much time thinking about gay sex.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This dude HAS to be a Poe

    ReplyDelete