What if women ruled the world?

Via Anonymous.

Freeper gender politics is always at least as awful as their racism, but usually not so explicit. This thread starts with some mildly offensive menstruation jokes, but then the anti-women voting crowd shows up, and we get an especially pure look at exactly what they think of women.

kearnyirish2 is pretty archetypical of the genre:

Men have run things for thousands of years; anyone who wants to see what happens when women run things need only look at the West over the last 20 years. The Western cultures are disappearing, and the countries are being re-populated by other ancient cultures (from the East) run by men. Maybe the lesson learned is that when men are emasculated the birthrate falls through the floor?

In any case, I regularly see Hindu men walking with their females a few paces behind, Muslim men wrapping their females in burquas, etc.; these are the “replacement Americans”.

ansel12 knows women have made male politicians all soft liars:

It isn't whether they vote democrat or republican, it is what they changed the conversation to, the issues to, the focus to, now soft language, soft issues, and soft men dominate American government and politics, because female voters of either party will recoil at masculine politics and issues.

Blunt, tough talking politicians who wouldn't stand a chance today, tough stances that wouldn't stand a chance today, issues that wouldn't stand a chance today, would do fine if all voters were men, both parties would be totally different, and much farther to the right.

Oh, and by the way, ansel12 is a feminist scholar:

I have the largest feminist library that I have seen in a home including the many lesbian and feminists homes that I have been in, although it is mostly packed away now. I used to subscribed to MS and my favorite feminist book is S.C.U.M., I unknowingly cured the president of a university NOW chapter, she showed me her hand and told me that she had removed the NOW ring and resigned her presidency because of changes in her thinking, because of me.

HangnJudge is pretty sure all pro-choice women are raving psychos:

If you can kill your own baby,
what other bridges are there?

Those are the scariest words I've ever seen on this forum

Teacher317 forgot about Palin and Thatcher!

Sheila Jackson Lee ("entitlements aren't handouts, they're earned" and 100 more brainy quotes)
Diane Feinstein ("You wouldn't want the government telling you what to do?")
Nancy Pelosi ("We have to pass it to see what's in it")
Hillary Clinton (""We are going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good"... "God bless the America we are trying to create"... "I have to confess that it's crossed my mind that you could not be a Republican and a Christian"... "On a couple of occasions in the last weeks, I just said some things that I knew not to be the case.")

Need I go on?

PapaBear3625 thinks the problem with women in charge is that men are all petty bastards:

A woman-run society tends to de-motivate men. The men's attitude becomes "Fine, you want to run things, go ahead. My buddies and I will be off fishing over there. Have fun". They will have little interest in defending the society, or spending lots of work keeping it going.

What inevitably happens then, is that the first man-run society that comes into contact with the woman-run society will conquer it. Which is why, over history, we tend not to see societies where women rule, or even have major influence over decision-making. The (short term) exception is current Western society, which is in the process of being overrun and taken over.

SamAdams76 advocates eugenics:

Well men should not mate with such women, nor should they donate to sperm banks. The result will be that those type of women will eventually become de-populated as they will not be able to reproduce without benefit of male sperm.

Fortunately, many women out there are more than adequate for men to establish long-term romantic/sexual relationships with that ultimately lead to procreation. There just isn't enough quality men to go around for them.

central_va, of course:

Women are natural socialists. So if you are a socialist/communist then women in leadership roles makes perfect sense.

everything bmwcyle knows about women he learned from Dr. Laura

Women do not work well with each other. Dr. Laura always said that they create 95% of all problems in a family. They all want to vote for a woman and all as I hear is Hillary. They elect on ugly or meek women who do not threaten their vanity or power. There is a reason the Bible warns against women in leadership roles.

papertyger backs up the Bible thing:

Even the Bible recognizes the disaster of women in positions of power. The book of Isaiah declares women and children as rulers to be a punishment from God.

papertyger also appeals to Constitutional originalism:

Our Constitution was not designed to be administered by women as they prize “security” over “liberty.”

vbmoneyspender knows where you learn women deserve to vote!

I was saying that when it comes to leading, voting, decision making, no one sex is better than the other.

Where did you learn that - in college?