Carley likes the sound of this:
A coup on behalf of America and the free world.allsouthern has analyzed Obama and knows he couldn't have made the call:
IF Obama had been involved in the decision making on whether to take down Osama, he would have wanted to “talk” Pakistan into giving him up, thus allowing them to assist in Osama’s escape. He would not have allowed a strike inside a muslim country, without their concent, to take out a target. Never. It would hurt his image with them. Obams did not make that call.DoughtyOne wonders what minor thing Obama did to let this happen:
GladesGuru on the Mansurian candidate:
It was probably some seemingly insignificant move on Obama’s part Sunday or before, that actually cost Laden his life.
It may not have been a conscious act by Obama at all.
Did he appoint the wrong guy?
Did he make the wrong fuzzy statement that led one of his staff to think they could issue the order?
Was he such a wus, that someone thought they should give the order since he never would, and that being the case he wouldn’t have the stones to take them to task rather than take credit for the kill?
I’m not sure. It’s worth contemplating. This is an Ayers die hard Leftist here. He’s a fellow traveler of so many anti-US people, that it’s tough to see him pulling the trigger on ANY enemy of the US or it’s people.
Obama is not “Dithering” - he is a Mansurian Candidate and is “The Enemy” we elected.bvw wishes things had gone differently:
If that’s true they made a very bad mistake. To kill the one evil man they empowered a more deadly one. Obama’s policies may not have already resulted in more deaths than Osama, but they certainly will if he gets re-elected.
Better that they would have let Obama fail, and make his failure notorious.