Monday, May 23, 2011

Spinning for Cain

Herman Cain scrambles when Chris Mathews Wallace asked him about the Palestinian right of return. Freepers, already chomping at the bit for the election to start so they can spin for folks beyond their fellows, jump to his defense:

This Just In posits mispeaking is the same as ignorance:

“The Cain Freepers will say “no issue” but the rest of us saw a “57 states” moment here.”

Hardly. Cain can count, and he knows his states. You’re comparing apples and oranges, not to mention that fact that you’re projecting.

The “Right To Return” was a question, and a set-up at that. Obama made an asinine statement. Big difference.

onona thinks Right of Return was totally a gotcha question:
I’ve been around awhile, and I’ve NEVER heard of this before I heard Levin describe what it was and what it meant only days before.

It’s a BS ploy

Yeah, this is totally esoteric. That's why I'd heard about it in High School.

VideoDoctor just says the opposite of what is true.
Cain is NOT going to be lead down the path to nowhere by any of the media.

Once again his entire interview showed he was knowledgeable on every subject.

If this is what they're goping to claim as ineptness by Cain then they are GROPING already in trying to diminish him.
Rashputin plays the race card:

Just typical media BS, most of which will focus on Cain for as long as it takes to make him look like a clown early on. The very last thing the democrat fascist party wants is a black guy anywhere near the Republican ticket in 2012.

txrangerette thinks this was just as awesome as Palin's 'In What Respect Charlie" moment.
Cain did a smart thing...he forced Chris Wallace to define the buzzwords and Chris did. Soon as Cain understood what he was being asked about, he responded that it was up to Israel in negotiations as to their position on that, not up to anyone else.

2 comments: