SusaninOhio knows what this is:
This is the beginning of the Obama race riots he has been fomenting.ClearCase_guy is feeling terrorized:
Not enough people realize that lynch mobs are back and they are wandering around looking for victims. It’s like it was 100 years ago, only the races are reversed. And the DOJ sees no problem with this.Baynative hears the coded messages:
The hatred and racial agitation spawned by Barack Obama is growing fast. These stories are appearing everywhere and the media is working hard to ignore them.headstamp 2 also thinks Obama is telling blacks to kill:
For the media that likes talk about code messages, the MLK anniversary march was an event to foment rage. (and it seems to be working) I ran across a half dozen stories of rape and violence perpetrated by feral urban youth this morning alone.
The mob has received the green light from the instigator in the White House.driftless2 doesn't want to sterilize all the blacks, only the dumb ones:
The murders will continue.
If we could check the average IQ of these feral, black youths, it would probably average about 80-85. They simply can't adapt to a civilized society. Until America finally faces up to the fact that it's time to sterilize these uncivilizable cretins, decent blacks as well as the country as a whole will be held back. The total amount of wealth wasted on these feral beings due to their criminality and lack of production totals many billions. Sterilize the bottom 20-30% of the black population, and things will improve dramatically. Meanwhile, much harsher measures should be taken against these thugs. Much harsher. Or we're headed for a race war.headstamp 2 laments the racism Obama has driven him to:
I had a black workman in my house today and I wondered if he hated me due to the color of my skinpopdonnelly is not a fan of the black mentality he's made up:
And sadly that is what you are forced to think in this age of Obama.
Enough of this. Something has to be done about this black mentality that it’s okay to kill people.onthegulf posts this 4 times in a row:
WAKE UP AMERICA, WE ARE UNDER ATTACK.CapnJack:
Why do I get the feeling the Klan is going to make a comeback in the near future.Yeah, I get that feeling whenever I read Free Republic too.
Maybe the right wing is focusing on the issue, but don't discount the racial violence entirely.
ReplyDeleteOverall crime may be down, but random racial attacks are up.
From the declassified 2011 FBI report on hate crimes:
Delete"In 2011, law enforcement agencies reported that 3,465 single-bias hate crime offenses were racially motivated. Of these offenses:
72.0 percent were motivated by anti-black bias.
16.7 percent stemmed from anti-white bias."
http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/hate-crime/2011/narratives/incidents-and-offenses
If anyone responds that the head of the Justice Dept. is "one of them", keep following that rabbit hole. I'm sure it will be time well spent.
(commie liberal faggots, suck mom's dick, play with poop, etc.)
So you're saying that crimes between races that resulted in "homicide, permanent brain damage, and permanent blinding, and were the result of many-on-one gang attacks" were necessarily due to the attacker hating the victim's race? Where did you come up with that? You do realize, don't you, that those kinds of attacks happen without there being a racial component in there, right?
DeleteYour "statistics" along with your claim that every white-on-black crime is always prosecuted as a hate crime once again earns you a [citation needed] from me.
It WAS a good start. Thank you. If you read further on that page:
Delete"Of the 7,254 reported hate crime offenses in 2011:
29.3 percent were destruction/damage/vandalism.
29.0 percent were intimidation.
22.0 percent were simple assault.
12.3 percent were aggravated assault.
0.3 percent were comprised of crimes against society.
The remaining 7.1 percent were comprised of additional crimes against persons and property. (Based on Table 2.)"
Some hate crimes involve just words without violence (intimidation), but the vast majority do not. Also, the vast majority are not "a white grandmother being beaten to death by black teenagers" (aggravated assault).
It's almost as if you didn't read the report at all.
Conservatives don't read, unless it's the Bible.
DeleteIn all honesty, the goal behind this "highlight black violence" strategy utterly eludes me. Obviously it is a coordinated effort, as most right wing media topics are. But if the RNC has been attempting to reach out to minorities, and the RW media is simply a water carrier, then what are they trying to accomplish?
ReplyDeleteOr have they just said "fuck it" to the outreach effort already and going with the strategy of galvanizing the current base of scared old white people? Which baffles me, since that's already been shown to be a losing strategy (and hence the reason for the whole outreach in the first place).
-FresnoGrifter
Yeah, the whole "reaching out to minorities" has always been lip service. The old, angry white people who are dying off are still their base, and they can't risk angering them if they don't want to be primaried. Nixon's "Southern Strategy" has come full circle and will likely end with the death of the Republican party.
DeleteI was discussing this with some other folks, and they just think Drudge, redstate et. al. have cynically decided ratings are more important than being politic.
DeleteNot to go all Godwin here, but the way Freepers are being manipulated to think there is some sort of race war brewing makes me understand how a normally intelligent and evolved country like Germany could have been turned into one that supported the nazis and their treatment of Jews and other minorities. That this could happen always baffled me, but not do much anymore.
ReplyDelete-FresnoGrifter
I thought that too, it's creepy as hell
DeleteMaybe the right wing is focusing on the issue, but don't discount the racial violence entirely.
ReplyDeleteOverall crime may be down, but random racial attacks are up.
You've got some solid proof of that "fact," I presume? If so, maybe you should post it here so it doesn't seem like you're pulling racially inflammatory claims out of your ass.
Nothing personal...it's just that I remember lots of right-wing racialist nitwits trying to argue that rapes and murders had skyrocketed due to immigration, even though the rates of both crimes had actually gone down -- particularly in cities with high immigrant populations. And currently, the only "news" sources I see for this story are right-wing blogs.
The FBI tracks crimes involving racial bias, and it doesn't seem to have announced an increase in anti-white violence. I do note, though, that in 2011, the stats looked like this:
In 2011, law enforcement agencies reported that 3,465 single-bias hate crime offenses were racially motivated. Of these offenses:
72.0 percent were motivated by anti-black bias.
16.7 percent stemmed from anti-white bias.
Looks like blacks will have to up their game considerably if they want to achieve parity.
"Trust but verify" may've been OK in the pre-Internet age, but nowadays I think we can simply leave it at "verify."
Oops...Anon 1 beat me to it on the stats. Well played!
ReplyDeleteMeganC thinks all the queers are going to be killed in the next great Cival War II..too bad she does not realize the vast majority of America gives a hoot if someone is gay and that number is growing.
ReplyDelete------------
"Then after the civil war is over the only place anyone will find a liberal or a queer will be in a history book.
7 posted on Tuesday, September 03, 2013 12:14:07 PM by MeganC (A gun is like a parachute. If you need one, and don't have one, you'll never need one again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]
Or have they just said "fuck it" to the outreach effort already and going with the strategy of galvanizing the current base of scared old white people? Which baffles me, since that's already been shown to be a losing strategy (and hence the reason for the whole outreach in the first place).
ReplyDelete-FresnoGrifter
WTF else do they have? Even their economic arguments -- such as they are -- are based on the idea that money seized from hardworking whites is buying welfare Cadillacs for strapping young bucks, supporting the perverted lifestyle of "sluts," or what have you.
Expecting conservatism to function without fomenting bigotry and fear is like expecting a car to win the Indy 500 without an engine. They have literally nothing else to offer -- no message, tactic or goal that doesn't ultimately depend on fear of women, darkies, queers and sex.
Fearful people are poor judges of risk and consistently make bad decisions. As long as that continues to be true, the GOP will work to keep as much of the country as it can as scared as possible.
As on 12:52 PM:
DeleteAgreed. I think that is why the GOP is dead as a national party. Most people accept that gays should have equal rights, that there should be some sort of minimum social safety net, that there should be reasonable gun laws, and that based on the current tax rates and economic situation, additional tax revenue should not be coming from the burdened lower and middle classes.
Within all those views, there is a common theme of moderation and practicality. And that doesn't leave much to excite the conservative base, so all the GOP can do is engage on scare tactics About rampant left wing Marxism, which can only be net with extreme right wing positioning.
Hence all the GOP has to offer is obstructionism. Because their positive beliefs are about putting AK-47s in the hands if anyone who wants them and making sure the top 1% get even more money to satiate their infinite greed. Not exactly a winning formula.
-FresnoGrifter
Anon - I am sorry. You are wrong and show just how far the GOP have gone off message.
DeleteConservatism is follow the constitution and give everyone an equal shot. That is pretty much it, though people may argue.
The thing is, "follow the constitution and give everyone an equal shot" means practically nothing. For years, since at least the 1980s, following the constitution has meant ignoring inconvenient parts, such as the entire First Amendment (for their political opponents, anyway), and the "organized militia" part of the Second Amendment. And giving everyone an equal shot means "as long as you have a lot of money". The way they have pushed these are through fear of the "other".
DeleteSo the GOP has not really gone off message (they have gone off the rails, though). This has been their message for decades. There just are not enough angry old white people to get them elected anymore.
Conservatism is follow the constitution and give everyone an equal shot. That is pretty much it, though people may argue.
DeleteYeah, which is why conservatives howl to the high heavens every time anyone tries to level the playing field between male and female, black and white, rich and poor. Or more to the point, when anyone so much as points out that the playing field is uneven in the first place. "Equal shot," in conservative-speak, means little more than "let's pretend that a child born to a high-school dropout from an Appalachian mining town has the same opportunities as a child born into a family with millions in stock-market earnings, so that we can blame the poor kid for failing to earn the advantages the rich kid was not only born with, but will eventually be able to influence the political process to defend." It's the same as their so-called "colorblindness," which is really just a cynical way of defending a rigged game while pretending to highmindedness. And their belief in "meritocracy," which is a fancy way of telling the disadvantaged "it serves you right to suffer" while genuflecting at the feet of born-on-home-plate boneheads like Donald Trump.
All this prattle about the Constitution is the exact same brand of bullshit, roughly on a par with the patter of carnival barkers and three-card monte dealers. It's always been obvious to a lot of us, but I think that now, even the rubes are starting to catch on.
What conservatism is about is cheap, powerless labor; the defense of unearned privilege; and the continued recognition of white men as God's official representatives on earth. The rest of it is platitudes and distractions.
Here's a bit more about that whole "equal shot" thing:
DeleteEverything about Crystal's life was ordinary, except for her death. She is one of a demographic-white women who don't graduate from high school-whose life expectancy has declined dramatically over the past 18 years. These women can now expect to die five years earlier than the generation before them. It is an unheard-of drop for a wealthy country in the age of modern medicine. Throughout history, technological and scientific innovation have put death off longer and longer, but the benefits of those advances have not been shared equally, especially across the race and class divides that characterize 21st--century America. Lack of access to education, medical care, good wages, and healthy food isn't just leaving the worst-off Americans behind. It's killing them. The journal Health Affairs reported the five-year drop in August. The article's lead author, Jay Olshansky, who studies human longevity at the University of Illinois at Chicago, with a team of researchers looked at death rates for different groups from 1990 to 2008. White men without high-school diplomas had lost three years of life expectancy, but it was the decline for women like Crystal that made the study news. Previous studies had shown that the least-educated whites began dying younger in the 2000s, but only by about a year. Olshansky and his colleagues did something the other studies hadn't: They isolated high-school dropouts and measured their outcomes instead of lumping them in with high-school graduates who did not go to college.
Politicians too often control access to education and health care, and rich people too often control politicians. The outcome is pretty much what you'd expect; conservatism's "genius" is to portray it as the working of divine will, so that grubby little hustlers like Paul Ryan or Ted Cruz are treated as God's most beloved because "success" and also "wealth."
To Anonymous 11:23 AM:
ReplyDeleteYour assertion is debatable. Is there any statistic from a respectable source that agrees with you that random violence of a racial nature is up? Or is it merely cherry picking and confirmation bias at work, where several anecdotal stories are reported on all at once and amplified by the media, at the exclusion of other stories that run counter to your assertion?
And if there is an uptick, how significant is it? Are we talking about 10 incidents instead of 7? This is similar to the reports a few years back that shark attacks were on the rise and out of control, all because of a couple particularly gruesome attacks occurring close to each other ( and Shark Week being advertised helped). In the end, I believe shark attacks that year ended up being *lower* than usual. It was the sensationalism that made it seem otherwise.
-FresnoGrifter
Dear Sir,
DeleteThere is a button titled "Reply" that could have assisted you with your post. Please use it in the future or face a fine of 3 Internets.
Internet Police
Bray's understanding of biology is frankly scarey http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3061951/posts?page=15#15
ReplyDeleteas is SamuraiScot's (or am I looking at parodists here? Surely no one can be that uneducated?). InterceptPoint is just living in a world where HIV doesn't cause AIDS because there are more diagrams of the virus on the Net than there are micrographs of it. And having antibodies against a virus automatically means you fought it off effectively and it didn't, say, bury itself in the genome of your immune cells. The stupid. It burns.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3061951/posts?page=23#23
The derp is strong with these two. My only reaction: http://i1.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/112/480/OpoQQ.jpg
DeleteAnd now Chickensoup has decided that AIDS for gay people is like the One Ring for Gollum. Lovely. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3061951/posts?page=54#54
Delete