They are not taking this stark revelation of their growing impotence well. The hate/fallacy ratio is extra high in this one.
x1stcav seems nice:
The c**ze.fieldmarshaldj is also reduced to sneering rage:
Bye, Jan.
Gutless bitch.markomalley knows what to call her:
RINO HOMOSEXUALIST.SADMILLIE is really into the word ganglia these days:
Time to boycott Arizona.
Jan Brewer will go down as a spineless homosexual ganglia. What a joke she was. They will not TRUMP GOD. Leviticus tells us what to do in the face of abomination.Red in Blue PA is being opressed:
I guess Religious people of all faiths just need to get over their religious beliefs. Gays have all rights.....nobody else has any.RoosterRedux knows nature hates gay: Perversion will always be perversion. Changing attitudes cannot change nature...and reality.
Sorry if your kid (I mean that rhetorically) is a sodomite...but that is still perverted.Extremely Extreme Extremist continues to predict the upcoming prosecutionsof churches.
This is a not new issue (or a progressive issue)...it has been around forever...and the sodomites always lose.
And why do they lose? Because it is a perversion of nature.
What Brewer doesn't realize that is it is never enough with these people. Already, they're plotting and scheming to force AZ churches to recognize homosexual weddings.clintonh8r knows who loves the gays!
She’s locking down those post-governorship corporate board positions. Ca-ching!sagar laments the coming of the cake-baking hell dimension.
All you little people must make cakes for homosexuals, or else you will be shipped to the concentration camp... where you will make cakes for homosexuals.M Kehoe is rolling apocalypse:
At a point in time, probably within the next three years, the state will begin killing Christians. This was predicted by the Lord 2000 years ago. So it is not a surprise or problem...clintonh8r turns on the NFL, which came out against the bill:
...Then again, those killing Christians might have a problem in the U.S.
Just sayin'.
5.56mm
Roger Goodell is overseeing the destruction of the NFL as surely as Baraq Hussein 0bama is tending to the destruction of America. The difference is that Goodell is just a clueless doofus, while 0bama deals in pure evil.BlackElk seems to think the NFL signed the Constitution:
the NFL should take its Superbowl and all of the rest of its games and put them where the sun shineth not. The NFL is hereby adding promotion of homosexuality (NOWHERE to be found in the actual Constitution) and repression of religious rights (First Amendment) to its previous refusal to allow advertising by the National Rifle Association or other gun advertisers (First and Second Amendments).Tzimisce has lost all perspective - all he can see is darkness. Liberal darkness.
The left has more political clout than us. That's why EVERY SINGLE PIECE of their agenda is being pushed through.
Sucks that we have to push through laws to reaffirm what's already in the Constitution.
What part of "unintended consequences" do these idiots not get? If the state will back you up for refusing to do business with the public because of your religion, voila - that's no different from Sharia law. It's just a different code. For people who claim to love the constitution so much, they sure don't seem to grasp all its implications.
ReplyDelete"The left has more political clout than us."
Really? I thought that the left was a huge failure at everything it ever touches. Kind of like how Obama is a bumbling, inept, unqualified, completely omniscient and all-powerful evil mastermind.
In conclusion, please call a waaahhhmbulance, freepers.
DeleteIcing on the cake, icing on the cake!
DeleteFreeper impotent tears of rage are the icing on the cake of gay equality.
Hear that anon1? The "CAKE" of gay equality!
ha ha ha
Freepers as a group pooped at least 500 pairs of Depends tonight.
ReplyDeletelittle jeremiah, who has said on FR that she actually saves her own poop for some sort of religious reason, probably went through 10 buckets all by herself.
ReplyDeletegan·gli·on
ReplyDelete[gang-glee-uhn] Show IPA
noun, plural gan·gli·a [gang-glee-uh] Show IPA , gan·gli·ons.
1.
Anatomy .
a.
a mass of nerve tissue existing outside the central nervous system.
b.
any of certain masses of gray matter in the brain, as the basal ganglia.
2.
Pathology . a cyst or enlargement in connection with the sheath of a tendon, usually at the wrist.
3.
a center of intellectual or industrial force, activity, etc.
So Jan Brewer is a spineless homosexual mass of nerve tissue.
.... ok.
I'm assuming Rush called somebody this at some point.
DeleteI couldn't help but notice re_nortex's signature:
ReplyDeletere_nortex (DP - that's what I like about Texas)
[inigomontoya.jpg]
I audibly laughed. In Texas there's nothing like balls touching.
It's really been a bad year for bigoted cake bakers.
ReplyDeleteHaving had the (good) fortune to live without regular indoor plumbing for quite a few years of my life, the idea of pooping in plastic bags is a horror show.
ReplyDeleteWhat on earth will anyone do with bags filled with crap? Any idea how heavy they will be? One little hole in them (and that is a given) will be ultra disgusting.
Composting toilets can be clean, non-smelling, and can be rigged up to compost even with a small city lot. I’ve seen it in action. The book “Humanure” is online - I have a hardcopy - and the best info on making composting toilets I’ve ever seen.
I’ve done bucket composting, barrel composting, trench latrines, outhouses - if anyone wants more info ask and I’ll get back to the thread later.
Poop also burns very well in a woodstove. It’s surprisingly good fuel.
51 posted on 04/02/2010 5:39:22 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
I am slowly but surely compiling spotlight materials on LJ.
ReplyDeleteThis will be one of them.
Dear FReepers,
ReplyDeleteThis is yet another example of the basic incompatibility of free-market capitalism with Christian theocracy. You can have one or the other*; you can't have both.
*You also can't have Christian theocracy, partly because Americans don't want it and partly because even if you got it, you're so fucking stupid and irrational and willfully blind to simple facts that you wouldn't be able to maintain a functioning society -- even a hopelessly blinkered and oppressive one -- for more than a few weeks, tops.
I'd almost like to be able to view, in an alternate reality, their attempt to impose a Christian theocracy on 300+ million people. Even the theocrats would never agree on how many angels can dance on the head of a pin. Pretty soon, they'd all be labeled "splitters!"
DeleteI almost wish this law had passed, just so I could see all these assholes melt down when a Muslim cashier refused to sell someone alcohol.
ReplyDeleteAlso, I've been hearing from conservatives for most of my adult life that "secular humanism" is a religion. I guess that means an atheist clerk at Barnes & Noble shouldn't lose his job for refusing to sell someone a Bible, right?
They also talk a lot about the "religion" of global warming, and the "religion" of environmentalism. I'm deeply concerned about both issues, which I believe entail serious questions of conscience and morality. So I should be able to refuse to pump gas even if I work at a filling station, right? I mean, you wouldn't want to force me to go against my conscience, would you? Especially when I have scientific evidence on my side, as opposed to a politically tendentious, semiliterate interpretation of an ancient book?
freepers being tribal creatures tend to be separatists. they're fine with discrimination only as long as they get to discriminate. in theory they don't mind others being able to walk over them only as long as they have their own stretch of curb to stomp everyone else on. though in practice they couldn't give a shit if no else had any room on the curb.
ReplyDeletekazan: "Who cares if the law upheld the right of freedom of association and for private businesses to refuse service to anyone for any reason?
That's the way businesses should be able to operate in a free nation. I don't care if homosexual business owners discriminate against Christians so long as Christians can do the same."
I bet if there were Freeper op eds in the 50s and 60s there would be screeds just like this one, replacing Christian with white.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/3127718/posts
"Legal Workaround to Labor Forced by Homosexual Privilege
Posted on 2/27/2014 3:52:33 PM by Talisker
I believe I have developed a simple, yet effective workaround to the new powers our government has handed homosexuals - specifically, the ability to force people to do labor against their religious beliefs (I never in a million years thought I would write such a sentence in America).
The solution is to identify the specific kind of issues over which homosexuals are likely to invoke their involuntary servitude powers, and separate those issues into a private Christian club.
An example: Christian bakeries would now put up a sign stating that they no longer make wedding cakes. Any wedding cakes, for anybody. They make all sorts of other cakes, including birthday cakes, but not wedding cakes - even for Christians.
Then, they would advertise a separate, private business: the Christian Wedding Cake Club. It would take a nominal fee to join ( say, five bucks), and also require the person to be a member in good standing of an affiliated Christian Church - one that has already been vetted and accepted into the club. Then, for those members only, the bakery would make and sell Christian wedding cakes.
There would be no hiding here - the purpose of the club would specifically be to make wedding cakes only for certain people affiliated with certain churces of a certain religious tradition. But those people would all have to join the club to get their cakes. And all of the members of the church would not have to join, and people who wanted a wedding cake would not have to join until they wanted their special wedding cake.
This is completely legal, and takes very little time to set up. All a Christian baker would have to do is call around to various pastors and confirm the “type” of Christianity they practice, let them know what the club is, and exchange confirmation letters. The actual club itself would be informal and non-profit.
That’s it. And it would also help with advertising, and there could be special discounts and sales at times for members of the club - whatever. And it can be done with any type of business, and any number of churches, and can even be run from the Web.
The principle here is that the bakery would be serving the needs of the club - and the club would need wedding cakes for its duly admitted Christian members. That way, nothing associated with wedding cakes would have anything to do with being “open to the public,” nor the general sales of the bakery.
In the Sherlock Holmes story “The Blue Carbuncle,” one of the characters puts up a coin every week at his local pub so that come Christmas, he can afford a goose. The pub runs a “goose club” for this purpose. You cannot come into the pub and buy a goose unless you are a member of the goose club. This is the same idea.
To get rid of this method, the government would have to get rid of private clubs altogether. I’m not saying they won’t try, since homosexuality now seems to be superior to the entirety of the Constitution. Nevertheless, until then, this is a clear, safe and easy way to refuse to comply with this new totalitarianism while staying completely legal.
And, of course, if a homosexual is a member in good standing in one of the affiliated Christian churches, they too can have a wedding cake made for them. So it’s all perfectly fair."
Nah, that takes more effort. They'd just complain to their buddies at the bar
DeleteSounds like a great business plan there - sell wedding cakes only to members of your own church (thereby eliminating 99% of your other customers), and sell an item that people ideally buy only once in their life (when they get married).
DeleteIf I see that Leviticus crap one more time on this sort of thread, I am going to find the nearest Freeper and steal their bacon, smash their barbeque and throw out any shellfish or crustaceans I find in their homes.
ReplyDeleteDon't forget the cotton and leather items
DeleteNever did get that interpretation. Can't even work out the verse it's from! I suppose the cotton bit makes vague sense, the tribes had just come out of Egypt and had no interest in trading.
DeleteWhen I was a kid in small town Texas in the 1960's black folks had the mark of Cain. Seriously, people used to say that. Religion was used as a reason to discriminate.
ReplyDelete"The split between the Northern and Southern Baptist organizations arose over slavery and the education of slaves. At the time of the split, the Southern Baptist group used the curse of Cain as a justification for slavery. Some 19th and 20th century Baptist ministers in the Southern United States taught that there were two separate heavens; one for blacks, and one for whites.[22] Baptists have taught or practiced various forms of racial segregation well into the mid-to-late-20th century, though members of all races were accepted at worship services.[23] In 1995, the Southern Baptist Convention officially denounced racism and apologized for its past defense of slavery.[24]"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curse_and_mark_of_Cain
Cain's facepalm is so appropriate for that article
DeleteI guess only Jim is allowed to grift.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3127699/posts
I think another poster of here said something went down with mestamachine a few days ago.
I mentioned it a few days ago but it happened some weeks back. Another anonymous poster referred to this blog by hardraade where he starts delving into the whole sorry affair :
DeleteHardraade's blog
That blog then refers to another blog kept by MestaMachine herself where she elaborates.
I think that freepers who lurk here saw the post a few days back, started asking what the deal was, and JimRob was forced to address it.
JimRob hates it when his dirty petty little tricks get called out into the light, especially in the middle of a grift-a-thon.
http://junipersec.wordpress.com/
DeleteLink to their blog, so you don't have to hunt back.
Thanks anonymous 919!!
ReplyDeleteAny time. I like Mesta. She used to wipe me out in arguments :) What's the sense of arguing if there's no option to learn or teach?
Delete