Tuesday, November 20, 2007

Lawyers, Guns and Drama

So the ole SCOTUS will take up the Second Amendment eh? Of course you know, this means war! Or drama. You know, whichever.

Red Badger doesn't want to be melodratic but...
If they side with the “state”, the Republic will fall.................
Long ellipsis denotes the suspense! Also, siding with the "state" will be upholding the status quo, and the Republic has been okay with that. So far..............................................................

The wrong SCOTUS opinion is a declaration of civil war.

The SCOTUS could start a civil war again! It'll be godless traitors vs. the Free Republic God-fearing Americans! They didn't step up when it came to Iraq, but this shit is SERUOIS!

Anybody out there TRUST the SCOTUS?
Me neither.
Lock and load, boys and girls. It’s going to be time to fight.
As in “bang bang.”

Don't tell anyone, but I think Flintlock got a boner writing that..."as in 'bang bang." That is evocative! With poets like that, can the SCOTUS have any hope?

Jack Black has left society long ago, due to his disagreement with the principles of checks and balances.

It’s too late. I’m long, long, past caring what our pseudo-masters in black robes say.

Affirmation of our right is certainly to be desired. However I seriously doubt that it will slow the gun-banners in their quest. So at best it will be a hollow victory.

If I agreed that the SC had the right to decide this, then I would agree that should they decide that gun-banning is Constitutional it would be legitimate.

Conversely if the SC rules against the individual right I will completely ignore this law, as it is absurd. My rights are not negotable.

I don’t care how many justices Lady Hillary eventually gets to appoint, nor how they rule on this. It’s just not open to furhter discussion.

See, courts don't matter to Jack Black. In fact, he still keeps slaves. Cause that's his right, and it's not negotiable.

Though having all of America on your side might help...

One can always tell a liberal socialist news writer.

ITS ALREADY AN ISSUE AND IT IS NOT DIVISIVE!

That debate is a unifier, and it will unify a large block of voters against the liberal socialsits and their wanna be Utopians whose idea of Brave New World is simply wrong, and unattainable.

"Devisive debate" punk low life no count liberal reporting.

Unifying Debate is the accurate term, and don'r forget it.
Unifying Debate. In Capital Letters. Candor7 has his thumb on the pulse of America! We all love guns here! But not buttsex, right Candor?

No comments:

Post a Comment