Thursday, May 17, 2012

Women: the downfall of America?

Via anon, we've seen that Freepers think women are problem (i.e. liberal) voters, and are thus one of the sets who's voting rights should be eliminated. But this thread starts from that premise, and then goes to some weird places.

not "only date Asian women" weird, but weird nonetheless.

Figment doesn't like women in power at all:
Women tend to act on emotion rather than fact. They don’t need to be in positions of control. I love them (my mother is one),but they don’t think right in some tense situations
fabian blames men for not being sufficiently loving to keep women in line:
if men wouldjust be stronger and have real love, the majority of women will fall in line wit that. That is my main point. Yes, there is blame on both sides, but the man is the most natural leader and is the one who the blame really falls on. Sort of like Adam, who was directly spoken to by God and then going along with Eve’s weakness.
Cringing Negativism Network goes with the BDSM metaphor:
Women are not about being logical, about government. Women don’t want independence. Women want to be ... meddled with. Coddled. Handled roughly at times. Everything a government should NOT DO. Ladies, you are destroying our once-great nation. All, because you want a pretend government boyfriend. Again, with apologies to ladies, to which none of that applies.
"Ladies, you SUCK. Except for you ladies, you're cool."

RegulatorCountry laments how men allowing birth control allows women to do things other than their natural, baby-factory role:
Female dominance as such is completely dependent upon men agreeing to allow it, for one, and chemically dependent upon birth control for another. Take those away, the tacit agreement of men to permit it as well as contaception, and there will be no dominance. It’s largely an illusion of our own making.
fr_freak breaks out the hoary old "women secretly have all the power, so they needn't get rights."
I had this discussion with a left wing woman once, just to mess with her head (and it worked....a little too well). My point was that women shouldn’t have the right to vote because then they wouldn’t have equal power - they’d have TOO MUCH power, vastly more than men. The reason being that there will always be a certain percentage of men who are weak and will allow themselves to be led around by the nose by a woman, even in the most brutal, manly times. We all know this type of men - the quintessential “beta” man, the kind of guy who follows around the girl he fancies for months or even years hoping that, if he does enough things for her or kisses her rear end enough, she’ll eventually like him and maybe he’ll get some, maybe she’ll even marry him.
Talisker blames feminism:
you aren't acknowledging the number of wrong women around today, or the social constructs designed solely to make as many wrong women as possible. Women have been taught to hate womenhood in the name of being a strong woman, and define the self-crushing of their femininity, hatred of men, and absolute codependence upon Leftist-led female obedience groups as the achievement of female liberation. The fundamental insanity of this has made them fundamentally insane - by the tens of millions.
Happy Rain explains that after the apocalypse, all the feminists will be raped and killed:
if society ever collapses I would rather have the women in my life be strong and independent and not like the "screamers and fainters" that portrayed women in all the movies in the 1940's and 1950's.
Well, after the collapse when the women not protected by brutish men ”the non-screamers and non-fainters” are all raped and murdered—before Armageddon notions such as yours should be recorded.

4 comments:

  1. I'd sure hope that first poster's mother is a woman

    ReplyDelete
  2. What a charming bunch.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Republican lawmakers and conservative talk show hosts should read these threads to see exactly what their policies and rhetoric are creating. Then again, maybe they know and just don't care.

    ReplyDelete