laweeks thinks the moderator is basically liberal Rush Limbaugh:
Why don't they just say that until they have a 50-50 participation (perhaps with Rush, Hannity, Levin, Malkin) as the co-moderator or perhaps as the ONLY moderator of at least 1/2 of them, then they can go to hell.bmwcyle has some advice for Romney:
She is one of the worse liberals there is. Romney needs to stuff a sock in her mouth.tom paine 2 knows the crowd will be in on it too!
There will be all kinds of Obama ringers in the crowd, primed to attack Romney.Buckeye McFrog agrees - Romney's expectations should be super low:
It will be a hall packed with Pony Tail Guys moderated by a Lib reporter. Romney will be under assault from the get-go.newnhdad cleverly surmises that the moderator will be fired if she doesn't deliver:
Her future in the media depends on Obama winning this thing. He wins, she keeps her show, he loses she gets a gig on Al Jazzera, RT or Current TV.ILS21R thinks the debates don't matter since Obama Holocausted the economy:
She’s an umpire that owes the mob a bunch of money and they’re sitting in a van outside his house awaiting the outcome of the game. Funny thing is that the fans in the stands know this.
Does it really matter who the moderator is or what role they play? Obama is now akin to Hitler coming out of the bunker at the end of WWII to debate Eisenhower on whose leadership will be better for Germany.Opinionated Blowhard explains the moderator's insidious goal:
Candy Crowley is one of the more partisan Dem reportes out there. Of course she’s going to try to open her fat mouth to cut off Romney when he’s on a roll and save Obama when he starts to stutter and stammer.hosepipe thinks this is all a setup:
Remember this: Crowley’s goal at this debate is not to host a good debate. Its to do everything she can to turn this into a “turning point” so that Obama and the press can start a “comeback” narrative. She’s looking for praise from her fellow reporters as the person who turned this back around for Obama. She wants to have an interview like Katie Couric had with Sarah Palin. One that was perceived as stopping the McCain - Palin momentum.
Right something stinks in Denmark.. These debates have been setup for republicans to loose.. Like on purpose.. Which make Romneys win over Obama in the first one “scripted”..shalom aleichem just foams at the mouth quietly:
If Obama hands Romney his ass in the next one you will know its true.. Like a B-movie it seems obvious to me.. WHy NO limbaugh, Levin or Malkin?.. or even O’Really?.. Van Susteran or Kelly?...
WHY?.. because it’s scripted.. The RNC is obviously complicit.. in this.. OR- IT WOULDn’T HAPPEN.. (every time)..
After “Che” Raddatz, how could Crowley be any worse?gimme1ibertee can't escape his own paranoid delusions:
Oh, she can be worse.
Repulsive POS
Romney's going to have to field questions about the dog on the roof of the family car, his "vulture capitalism" while at Bain, his callous uncaring for cancer victims and his inability to release his tax records for the past 40 years. That damned monster! What is he hiding?Also, if you wanna see fat jokes, this is the thread for you!
Meanwhile,0bama will be beaming proudly at his record of creating a media fan-base and wowing the entitlement class with his ability to feel their pain-not to mention the fact that he's "eye candy" to the likes of the liberal harpy shrews on daytime talk shows and ass-lickers like Letterman.
UGH. Get me OUT of here.
No comments:
Post a Comment