Wednesday, April 9, 2014

Fort Hood Muslims Truthers

The Fort Hood shooter seemed to be someone with a Hispanic name, not a Muslim. Freepers struggle to maintain their perfect narrative, which means straight to the tin foil:

gaijin knows who could have saved those lives!
If the NSA had not been so busy sifting through all the kitteh email and puppy texts of Joe Six Pack, you know what?

THIS WOULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED.
floriduh voter heard a rumor that's too good to check:
He’s Mohammed and there should have been a BOLO since he was recently discharged and apparently, nobody was shadowing him. This was predicted on March 31 but no name was given until today. He has three part name but Mohammed first name.
floriduh voter wasn't wrong - it's a conspiracy!
That was quick. They changed his muslim name to his latina name. He went from Mohammed back to Lopez in a NY minute. Sounds like a convert to islam but that would start a blame game. If he’s plain old Lopez, it’s better for the cia.
Monkey Face wonders if the shooting itself was planned:
Here comes the gun control argument again.

Never let a good crisis go to waste. This will take attention away form 0bamacare.


Conspiracy?
livius senses Muslimness, and explains how evidence doesn't matter these days:
You haven’t heard his Muslim name yet. And we probably never will, although one reporter (just before the Army told them they couldn’t interview witnesses) said he appeared to be “an extremist,” the polite way of saying “jihadi.”
PghBaldy remembers Freepers hate hispanics too!
If it is a hispanic or black or muslim who did it, we won’t hear much from the liberals.
devolve has a number of theories:
Homo?
Muzzie
Drug Cartel?
SADMILLIE solves her problem:
Was Lopez an illegal Alien?
SADMILLIE again:
great work!! I admire you internet skills. I hereby nominate you for “ FREEPER OF THE YEAR’!! I want to know if he was an illegal alien or a moslem convert!! I want to know NOW!!
catnipman blames Obama:
What happened Obama, you lily-livered piece of shit, is that you won’t let our soldiers carry weapons to defend themselves because you don’t trust them. Our military bases are now just another set of gun-free zones that provide crazies a safe environment for them to wreck mayhem.
Monkey Face blames Clinton:
Why are the soldiers disarmed? Because of a CLINTON!!! The name alone should be thrown in the crapper and the folks with that name who are directly responsible for so MUCH misery, deception and evil deserve the depths of hell.

But who am I to judge?
Monkey Face also blames Obama:
It’s probably one of those, “If I had a son, he would shoot up Ft. Hood” moments.

Talk about racism...I’m nearing 70 and have never seen such blatant racism in my life in this country. I recall the days of Selma, AL and I think we have regressed much faster than we ever pro-gressed.
basil - potential killing fields.
I label all “gun free zones” as potential killing fields.

I will not enter one except when I have business at a government office.
stanne is defending veterans, but it pretty damn wrong:
PTSD does not carry with it a propensity to hurt others.

KT McFarland was on Hannity screeching about how this was the second time PTSD and our neglect of soldiers has hit Ft hood

No. Hasan did not suffer from PTSD. He had a Jihad. I’t a bit damned different.

Nam one person who shot everyone dt PTSD. Mc Veigh? OK that was 20 yrs ago and the evidence shows, just by the swiftness with which he was tried and executed, he was not alone.

Anyone else? NO

This is so bad the way they’ll spin it with the help of commenters who don’t know about {TSD

THey are champing at the bit to corral everyone in as about to shoot everyone.

31 comments:

  1. Has anyone ever read "CreepyPasta" online?
    It's basically an internet collection of ghost stories or spooky tales, presented as reports of something that really happened.
    Readers vote on which stories are the best, the scariest, the most believeable.

    Free Republic has become the "CreepyPasta" of the far-right blogosphere ... freepers all taking turns telling their scary stories, hoping for a "Woo Hoo" from their fellow story tellers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'll give you a "Woo Hoo" for that.
      Very good!

      Delete
  2. Freepers seem to think they have some sort of patent on Christianity. I am not quite sure what constitutes Freeper Christianity but you can bet on one thing, whatever it is the YOU are doing is wrong.

    They seem to have somehow adapted Christianity in a religion of hate too. That is just so weird.

    Meanwhile, in the rest of America, we are all just kind of happy to make our own choices about such things and we don't really care much what our neighbors' choices are. This is America. We are a free people. If you want to pray in Klingon under the light of the Martian eclipse, that is perfectly OK with me. Live long and prosper. And don't forget the bake sale we are having for the volunteer fire department this Friday.






    ReplyDelete
  3. Anon 12:52"This is America. We are a free people. If you want to pray in Klingon under the light of the Martian eclipse, that is perfectly OK with me. "

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    What about the Christians freedom not to have to bake a cake or photograph a gay wedding? Typical Liberal hypocrisy..freedom as long as a person walks lockstep to liberals views.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't think Klingons walk in lockstep with anybody. They are Klingons!

      Delete
    2. Read the back issues of Freeper Madness. That issue has already been covered.

      Delete
    3. Covered one sided..about sums it up.

      Delete
    4. Pull yourself up by your own bootstraps, then. Google is your friend. Learn all about it an report back with your findings,

      Delete
    5. Agreed anon1. Conservatives never legislate against peoples personal freedoms such as abortion, alcohol (sales and consumption), voting rights etc...

      Delete
    6. anon1, I hate to take valuable time away from your job at the Cluck Bucket, but there is a reason you have to serve that black fellow who just pulled up in a new Cadillac and not object to serving him on religious grounds.

      It turns out that black folks don't really carry the Mark of Cain and they are not cursed. That was just a bunch of hooey the Southern Baptist Church and others used to justify slavery and the segregation of the Jim Crow era.

      Here is something to get you started on your reading but please do your own research from now on instead of asking over and over for the same information. Follow this subject further. Learn something on your own. Thanks.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curse_and_mark_of_Cain#Baptist_segregation

      Delete
    7. I hope you don't serve fried shrimp down there are the cluck bucket. God Hates Shrimp!

      http://www.godhatesshrimp.com/

      I am pretty sure that eating shrimp is just as bad as sucking dick, but it is a long time since I read Leviticus, so I am not sure.

      Delete
    8. "anon1, I hate to take valuable time away from your job at the Cluck Bucket, but there is a reason you have to serve that black fellow who just pulled up in a new Cadillac and not object to serving him on religious grounds."
      __________________________________________
      Denying service based on race should be against the law,,I have stated this a hundred times.

      Delete
    9. Nobody cares what you think. You are a troll.

      Delete
    10. "Agreed anon1. Conservatives never legislate against peoples personal freedoms such as abortion, alcohol (sales and consumption), voting rights etc..."
      --------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Republicans freed the slaves, gave women, blacks and 18 to 24 year people the right to vote, I could waste my time with more, but even your comment has no merit.

      Delete
    11. "Agreed anon1. Conservatives never legislate against peoples personal freedoms such as abortion, alcohol (sales and consumption), voting rights etc..."
      ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Which party is it that wants to regulate the fatty foods you can or cannot eat?

      Which party is it that wants to ban a entire company (chick fil a) from coming to their cities due to the owners personal beliefs?

      Which party is it that wants to ignore the second amendment and take guns from the hands of law abiding citizens?

      Which party is it that wants the FCC to take radio shows like Rush Limbaugh OFF THE AIR for saying things they don't agree with?

      Which party is it that wants to have people thrown in jail for language that is offensive to others?

      Which party is it that pushed laws that enable minority races to get college admissions over non minorities that may be more qualified?

      Which party pushed a law that FORCES people to pay out of pocket for healthcare or pay a fine?

      Which party pushed laws trying to FORCE religious institutions to provide contraception?

      The answer to all the above questions is DEMOCRATS!

      At all times democrats believe that they know what is best for you and because of that, they have the right to make laws that tell you what you can or can't do.


      Delete
    12. It has been a pleasure educating you today. Now go forth and educate yourself!

      Delete
    13. "Nobody cares what you think. You are a troll."
      -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      No, you libs only want freedom and tolerance on issues you believe..that is the real issue here.

      Delete
    14. Anon1:"Denying service based on race should be against the law,,I have stated this a hundred times."

      The problem is that no one really thinks you believe that, based on everything else you say here. It's just the racist's expected denial of being racist.

      Delete
    15. I told you a 100 times my views on blacks versus niggers.

      Delete
    16. anon1 please can you explain what's up with your obsession with gay cakes?

      Delete
    17. "I told you a 100 times my views on blacks versus niggers.

      Quod erat demonstratandum.

      Delete
    18. anon1, you're very fixated upon these wedding cakes, it seems. Tell me, are you married? Or planning to get married? If the answer to either question is "no," then why don't you let it go already? You sound like a maniac. If Christians (or anyone else, for that matter) are proud of refusing service to people they wish to discriminate against, why don't they just advertise as such? That way, they get to proclaim their moral superiority, and no unwitting customer will ever go in there expecting to be treated with respect by mistake. Win-win?

      Delete
    19. Good grief...do I really have to unpack an entire suitcase of copy-and-paste lies and half truths?

      "Which party is it that wants to regulate the fatty foods you can or cannot eat?"

      Suggesting alternatives and providing labeling information is not the same thing as "regulating." Please look up "regulating" in the dictionary, and feel free to stuff your fat face - nobody cares.

      "Which party is it that wants to ban a entire company (chick fil a) from coming to their cities due to the owners personal beliefs?"

      So, that's a Democratic party platform plank now? I thought not. If a town doesn't want Chick-a-Bigot in their area, I thought guys like you were all about "freedom of association." But only when it goes YOUR way, right? (I think Chick-a-Bigot will continue to do just fine, btw.)

      "Which party is it that wants to ignore the second amendment and take guns from the hands of law abiding citizens?"

      This is your biggest fundraiser issue! So, how many guns have Obama's storm troopers removed from your house now?

      "Which party is it that wants the FCC to take radio shows like Rush Limbaugh OFF THE AIR for saying things they don't agree with?"

      Yeah, I miss Rush since he went off the air. Him and Howard Stern. Radio used to be great before the FCC.

      "Which party is it that wants to have people thrown in jail for language that is offensive to others?"

      I personally think it's the uptight wrinkle bags on Free Republic and overgrown schoolgirls like Sarah Palin who say "flippin" when you know that cnut is DYING to say "fucking," but you may have a different opinion.

      "Which party is it that pushed laws that enable minority races to get college admissions over non minorities that may be more qualified?"

      I'm sorry, I thought the Republicans were the party that's all about equality for minorities. That's what you're always claiming. Guess it wasn't them.

      "Which party pushed a law that FORCES people to pay out of pocket for healthcare or pay a fine?"

      Which party NEVER came up with their OWN solution to the problem of the uninsured? Oh, I'm sorry, the Heritage Foundation (Democrat-leaning organization) DID come up with a solution, but Republicans don't typically like the Heritage Foundation's ideas, so...You got me on this one. Which party did come up with the idea?

      "Which party pushed laws trying to FORCE religious institutions to provide contraception?"

      Define "institution." If you're a church, no, you don't have to provide contraception. Period. Pun intended.

      Delete
    20. That is a very good recap, anonymousB.

      anon1's problem is his brain cannot process the difference between one liberal saying something that he doesn't like (and even many other liberals disagreeing with), and Democratic Party principles.

      That is like holding the Republican Party to every fool thing coming out of Bill O'Reilly's or Bryan Fisher's mouths.

      We're not that stupid, but anon1 seems to be.

      Delete
  4. "It has been a pleasure educating you today. Now go forth and educate yourself!"
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Appears I was the one doing the bitch slapping here today.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Really, anon1, what is your thing with cake?
      No matter what the subject is of the thread, you always bring it back to cake.

      But you are right about the Republican Party. The Republicans used to be good in decades and centuries past..
      What happened to them recently?
      Why have they turned into such a nanny state intrusive and anti-freedom party?

      Delete
  5. "Why have they turned into such a nanny state intrusive and anti-freedom party?"
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    I'll give you the abortion/gay thing but c'mon..liberals want to regulate every aspect of our lives.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Like employees' rights to organize? Or peoples' right to criticize their government? Or peoples' rights to vote? Or poor peoples' access to healthcare, food, and unemployment insurance so they can make ends meet?

    By the way, those three right there are "right to work" laws, the Patriot Act, the various new voting ID laws meant to combat voter fraud, and the truly godawful number of Republican-led states that have turned down federal funding for social benefits programs for political reasons (http://www.healthinsurance.org/blog/2014/04/08/reports-of-aca-demise-greatly-exaggerated/ although that link is admittedly left-leaning)

    Tell us again how much the Republican party cares about people when it is more than willing to actually, in all seriousness, without any exaggeration, let our country's most vulnerable citizens die - cold, hungry, and sick - in the streets to score political points with its base of (mostly) Christians?

    I don't know about you, but I tend to look at how laws and regulations affect other people before I start bitching about paying an extra few dollars a month on my taxes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ah, what a fool I am, I meant to respond directly to anon1 at 5:59 right there. Ozy, if you could be so kind to fix it I'd greatly appreciate it

      Delete
  7. I love the conservative response when confronted with the GOP's current anti-poor and anti-non-white legislation... "but we freed the slaves". That was 149 years ago. I could care less what was done by a political party when my great-great-grandfather was alive. What they doing, their sociological attitude and how they are effecting the country and it's people now is what matters. It would be like saying "Scandinavians are a war-like people... remember they used to be Vikings."

    ReplyDelete