Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Mary Cheney marries

MDaF looked this one up.  I hadn't even heard the story.

 There's a bit of a Freeper flame war over how much to hate Mary Cheney for being gay.  I, of course, am focusing on the haters, cause the name of the blog is not "Freeper Classy Civility." 

 LonelyCon is pretty short with Dick Cheney:
Yeah, we're so happy for your pervert daughter, Dick. Now shut up all you RINOs and go back in the closet.
JSDude1 actually turns on the Sainted Dick:

Never liked the Cheneys, they were alsways the rulling class elitist (anti-Christian) Republicans.
madprof98 has invented a new right:
 Every child has a right to both a mother and a father. These two children were deliberately deprived of that right. Their “mothers” can call themselves married or whatever else they want, but they cannot rectify the evil they have done against innocent human lives.
 So...no divorcee if you have kids, then!

No idea how savagesusie doesn't get tired of her own act: 
 “Marriage” is an impossibility. The way Marxists destroy language to control perceptions and form “reality” of children is evil. Chaney’s are evil for trying to destroy Christian Ethics which made this country great and replace them with Satanism—nihilistic, debasing acts which will always be a Vice. Shame on you, Chaneys—and you have grandchildren whose Concepts of human Nature will be totally warped and right out of the handbook of Satan.

Maybe she's one of those Turing test AIs.

Travis McGee
We are in late stages, CB, late stages. Weimar, just before Adolf. Crazy times, kinky times, no rules, no values....
About to hit the Big Reset Button. The survivors will determine the new value system.
Perhaps after centuries of Dark Ages.
I mean, after Rome started in with the gayness, they had like 400 years left, tops!
 
Jim from C-Town has his own definitions of words:
Mary and her partner have never had children together. Mary had a child with the help of an unnamed masturbate who inseminated her by proxy months after he self gratified with little more in mind than the $50? he received for his ‘efforts’. She and her two bastard children co habitat in a sinful relationship with their mothers fellow pervert.
Mary and her ‘partner’ are not now nor will they ever be ‘married’ as pretending that the deviant relationship is a marriage, doesn't make it so.
AnonymousConservative analogizes a gay couple having kids to a dog infection:
I love Dick Cheney, and hate to say it, but I draw the line at kids. If she and her partner wanted to live alone it’s one thing. But the research shows now, it’s a bad deal for the kids, which will not get them any sympathy from me. (Dick is another story, God bless him).
If I carried a latent viral infection, which would make any dog I had mildly sick, I wouldn’t have any dogs, ever. I’d rather know that the dogs I would have had, were healthy and loved elswhere. Why people don’t feel this way with their own kids is beyond me.

 brent13a has never met a happy gay person.
Perhaps all your gay friends are the exceptions to the rule but I have never met a truly "happy" homosexual. They are consistently never able to maintain a real romantic relationship which is coupled by at least moderate mental issues. 
Professionally I run into two types of homosexuals, one is the constant domestic abuser, the second is the suicidal, on many occasions I've even ran into the older/younger stalker relationship paradigm. None of them have been had ever been "happy". 
Neither personally nor professionally have I yet to run into a homosexual couple that was "normal" (in any way) with the normal man-woman- hetero couple problems.
apillar responds to the many Freepers wishing the married couple happiness:
It's scary how many so called "conservatives" these days support sodomites and Gay Marriage. In my opinion it should be a banable offense on freerepublic considering it's in direct opposition to social and religious values our country was founded on.
Because you can't wish someone well if they're gay!

wardaddy counsels a Freeper who is shocked at the nastiness:
I believe you are female ...have you ever considered googling with your filter off what gay men consider pleasure?
My mother was a fag hag as was my wife....I pressured them to educate themselves about the fact that homosexuality is more than witty thin men who have good taste and are creative and love to dress women...and do it well i might add
I don't think most women who think homosexuals are cutesy really know much about it...just saying
if you are a man-dog like me and peruse the net looking at naked girls at times you will invariably see something queer pop up....and it will shock you like a car wreck...the old Pacino movie Cruising touched on it till the Velvet Mafia in Hollywood made sure that kernel of truth never sees the light of day again
It is pretty amazing how many facts Freepers get from melodramatic action movies.

3 comments:

  1. Here's some threads to check out and a blurb:
    In an otherwise useless thread about the existence of purgatory & a woman's scrifice:

    I cannot stand reading the leftists’ takeover language of “they were pregnant”. It’s ridiculous, plainly untrue, and a rewrite of reality like “gay rights” and “gay marriage”.

    Thread about an 18yo student being caught kissing his teacher: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2898633/posts
    Includes cripplecreek listing all the ways to destroy conservatives that the libruls use. As well as gems like:
    "Fact: Every physically fit pubescent and post pubescent male who is not mentally ill (aka homosexual) obsessively fantasizes about sex with any and every ATTRACTIVE post pubescent female.
    Fact: There is no empirical evidence that consensual sex acts between pubescent and post pubescent males and ATTRACTIVE older females which don't result in pregnancy or STDs has any lasting negative effects on the males other than their constantly annoying their friends with their endless bragging about the affairs.

    Politically correct lie: The first above is sick and the last is wrong and those caught in the act should be treated as harshly as if an older man statutorily raped a young girl--oh, and God help you if you don't accept the lie. "

    and:

    "The real crime here is that taxpayers are being forced to pay the salary of a “global-studies instructor”."

    Anoter thread about Planned Parenthood teaching oral sex to kids in school (? what is this I don't even): http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2897552/posts
    Includes:
    "I miss the 50s. Back when “educators” like these would be imprisoned for pedophilia and when faggots knew to stay in the closet."

    and in one of savagesusie's rants:
    "Sex Ed destroys the normal sexual formation of young children—by focusing on sex organs when they have too little experience and immature emotions and can not utilize the information in a mature manner. It destroys their educability according to all experts and warps their perception of the world and focuses on debasing their bodies-—reducing them to animal acts without morality and meaning."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey, Comedian, welcome back! We've missed you the last few days. You know, I kind of miss police brutality, too. After all, you know your over the target if you're catching a lot of flak.

      Delete
    2. You know what I miss? Planters' PB Crisps. You know what else I miss? Getting my skull busted open by cops wielding nightsticks and flash lights.

      Delete