Monday, February 27, 2012

Gingrich Suggests There’s a ‘Right Way’ to Legalize Gay Marriage

The era of good feelings between Santorum and Newt supporters on Free Republic is over. Turns out all you needed for Freepers to stop ignoring Newt was to have him disagree with Santorum about how crazed to be in your anti-homosexuality.

Apollo5600 actually attacks Santorm's extremism!
Keep in mind the Santorum people are running on a Moral Majority platform. If we aren’t automatically foaming at the mouth when we hear the words “gay marriage,” we must not be true believers.
Retired Greyhound uses bigoted language, so he can advocate for sanity:
I’ve always contended that the proper channel to advance homo marriage is thru the state legislature, NOT the courts.

I have no problem with what Newt is saying here. He is not advocating homo marriage.
JudgemAll Doesn't care about Newt, point is, he's being genocided and oppressed by the gays.
Is there a legal way to impose on me a gay married couple? Paying taxes for their recognition? A budget for it? Say what?

My buddy in NYC could not get his marriage license for a week because gays had overflowed the process. This is utter horse crap.

Gay marriage is a not a civil right. Heck, the gays have declared heterosexual marriage and birth not a civil right.

I should not have to hire a gay married person, enough said.

Gingrich is talking about imposition or legalization?

What part of the word war have they not understood that is coming from these groups? This is genocide, folkes, GENOCIDE, under the guise of protecting them from harassment.
Steelfish knows there can be no right way to do things he doesn't like:
Shows just how intellectually bankrupt you are when you can’t face the truth of a news report; resort to polemic, and name-calling.

All the spin about how Gingrich is against gay marriage is besides the point. In no uncertain terms he thinks there is a “right way” to legalize anything homosexuals do and by train of logic (if you could follow me), we can be against incest, polygamy, abortion, but there is always a “right way” to legalize the very rot that is infecting our society to the core.
Hollywood today is giving Gingrich a standing ovation. And instead of having the integrity to say either he misspoke or he was dead wrong, you attack the bearer of news. This is the stuff that gives your guy a bad name- sometimes a candidate is judged by the company he keeps. No?
muawiyah is too crazy to stay on topic:
As California becomes more and more Latinized you will learn more and more about the tradition of the Caudillo or "Commander or Warlord" who makes all the decisions whether you like it or not.
At the moment the judges are taking that role. When the Caudillo comes on the scene they will be quickly replaced by men who do not wear gowns.
EternalVigilance doesn't understand what being a country of "laws not men" means.
“Gay” “marriage” is a gross violation of the natural law. Legitimate state power does NOT extend there.

The idea that the natural law can be overruled by a democratic vote is silly in the first place, and a direct attack on our republican form of government in the second place. The founders of this free republic intended that we be a nation of laws, not of men.

No comments:

Post a Comment