Thursday, February 23, 2012

The Romney-Paul alliance

Ron Paul seems to only be Romney's opponents. Santorum thinks there is a deal between them. Stranger things have happened.

A lot of Freepers are weirdly skeptical of this conspiracy theory, but many of them jump right on:

reasonisfaith proves through sarcasm:
Maybe it was just coincidence that Paul didn’t go after Romney.

Maybe Paul is unaware of the fact that Romney has a long established record of opposing the conservative and Constitutional principles that Paul claims to support consistently.

Maybe Paul forgot to go after Romney.

Maybe Paul just likes Romney, all politics aside.

Maybe Paul hasn’t gone after Romney in the past, and he just wants to be consistent.
MulberryDraw knows Paul has lost the Freeper vote!
I like a lot of Paul’s ideas but if he’s not opposing Romney, then forget Paul.
xzins has decided libertarians must be liberal:
Paul is a libertarian and Romney is a liberal.

The only difference between the two is one wants to control spending and the other doesn’t care.
AmericanInTokyo knows there's a conspiracy somewhere, but is waiting for a good crazy blog post to glom on to.
The fix is in. Somebody in the beltway over enough Vodkas will spill the beans. I really do smell a rat.
Mountain Mary is all over the place:
Paul and Rom. were like two bullies on the playground last night.
It was beyond obvious that they were in cahoots. Steve Hayes said Paul team admits that they have been talking regularly, ie conniving with, Mittens and CO.

If I was Rick, I don’t know if I would want to continue to put up with this vitriolic assault. I’d have to ask myself if it’s worth it to give up my peace of mind and my life for an uncertain future. He is a courageous fighter but at some point, you have to ask yourself at what price victory?
It’s clear that the fix is in for Mittens nomination with many, many forces working for this end besides him and his evil band of brothers.
And those think he will be a good choice to run against Hussein will come to rue the day.
Dr. Sivana brings up Sarah Palin for some reason:
This is the kind of thing that someone like Sarah Palin can insinuate without actually saying. Sometimes when she uses that purposefully ambiguous language it drives one nuts. I can see why it is necessary these days with the way the MSM picks up a sound bite and won’t let go like a puppy with an old slipper.
Crimson Elephant has an interesting scenario:
I wouldn’t be shocked if Romney figures out a way to throw Newt, Santorum and Paul all a bone with VP (I agree any deal though with Ron Paul might be for Rand), cabinet posts whatever, and go on tour as a “team” against Obama.

No comments:

Post a Comment