Babies under threat? Pandemics? Both of these are in Freepers' wheelhouses, but anything outside of America that Freepers can't use for partisan gain is not. So they meet this horror with complete disregard.
Opinionated Blowhard is pretty sure this is faked:
If it means having a chance of adding a couple billion to the WHO budget, they will find it to be a crisis.DH takes this massive human tragedy as an excuse to dunk on some libs:
The claim is that the disease will cause babies to have tiny heads. That statement is simply WRONG!allendale found a narrative, old and busted though it may be:
Babies with tiny heads are caused by a different disease that their parent carried while they were in the womb....it’s called LIBERALISM.
The tiny head is not capable of containing the “common sense” gene due to its tiny size. A normal brain must exist to be able to carry enough brain cells to have common sense and reasoning.
Unless governments ditch the pseudoscience and start using DDT extensively, this Zika outbreak will worsen. It will devastate the economies of Central and South America, worsen the world recession and ruin the 2016 Olympics in Brazil.BenLurkin is really bad at correlations:
This virus however probably has crazy environmentalists cheering. It discourages and makes human procreation ineffective. They would do anything to limit human population especially in the Third world.
Epidemics and pandemics have only gotten worse since WHO became active.i_robot73 is worried about Muslims breeding:
It is obviously doing something very wrong.
Must have built up an immunity; those in the M.E. seem to breed like cockroaches. So much so, they’re flooding Europe again.No amount of ignorance regarding the deadliness of disease and Muslims BitWielder1 from his clever slogan!
/I 1/2 /s
I'm more worried about mosque-borne threats than mosquito-borne diseases.