Friday, October 9, 2015

Spotlight Friday: exPBRrat



One of the more simplistic hate-paranoia constructs I've seen. A Freeper since 2009, I'm not sure what his name means.

But he just really wants to say nigger.

There are no shortage of Freepers who post every crime committed by a black person as proof blacks are inhuman violent monsters. Thus guy blames blacks for stuff beyond the (still decreasing) violent crime rate. From outsourcing to political correctness, it's all because of the 'negroes.' And the middle east is full of 'sand negroes,' so his unthinking racism does double duty.



Lets start out with a bang:
You can’t civilize negro.
A black mugger in Orlando:
Our precious negros being themselves.
What does this racism even mean?!
Negros can break an anvil...that’s what they do.
Is this some sort of fig leaf that there are non-negro blacks?
The negro drama is never ending...

...and it’s not about the color of their skin.
Janet Napolitano appointed head of the UC system, because negroes:
That’s life as we transform from a free speaking Republic into anything goes rule of clown negroism.
He loves that phrase!
...and the descent into the era of clown-negroism continues.
Corporate offshoring? Because of negroes:
Another reason why corporate America moved off shore was to get away from these secretive phoney baloney ‘human rights’ kangaroo courts that coddles negros with hurt feelings.
Muslims are also negroes:
sand-negros = negros, ...get the picture?
Syrian negroes love killing each other and food stamps:
Wars without end is the sub-saharan negro way of rule the people...and the favored vote buying ‘subsidy economy’ can be found in the EBT cards so prevalent among his perfect voters support base.
Jacksonville, Florida makes it illegal to back into your driveway:
...another shakedown on the continuing war on white people.
Of course he loves Trump
I’m really starting to like ‘the Donald’.
Trump won't listen to no sand negroes:
What I like about this billionaire is that he’s not impressed by payoff of sand negro petro dollars to influence legislation.
Hillary throbs with demonic power:
I suppose you could put me in that ‘Hillary is unbeatable’ camp too. Not only is she possessed with demonic power...she has all the unelected king making political forces aligned with her...
Global warming? No, global cooling!
Look for the lefty kooks to demand worldwide CO2 generators once they learn that is was thanks to the Industrial Revolution that we already avoided another ice aqe.
Endorsing the KKK of the past!
with the excesses of this clown negro regime the danger of a ‘critical mass’ moment exists revealing the so called racists of our distant pass were absolutely correct on the condition of black culture and their devastating effect on civilized society.

Thursday, October 8, 2015

Whose next for the meat grinder?

Welp, so much for McCarthy

In 1855 the Whigs' dissolution lead to a bunch of parties, and no one could gather a majority for any of the Speaker of the House candidates. In the end the House had to change the rules to allow a plurality, and the Republicans' candidate got in.

Such seem to be the times we're in now. Boehner's out. Then the second in command suddenly withdrew presumably due to Tea Party intransigence. I saw an amusing ad:
Speaker of the House

Pros: 3rd in Line for the Presidency
Cons: Everything else. 

Freepers, whose only victories seem to be over their own party lately, celebrated very briefly. But as is always the case, blood calls for blood, and they are now howling for another scalp - McConnell, for Boehner to be forced out sooner, and most of all for Paul Ryan, Boehner's latest choice, who has turned it down twice now but seems the last hope... Best. Soap Opera. Ever.

conservativegranny is not a fan of Ryan:
Paul Ryan would be like John Boehner without the spray tan.
Mamzelle is seeking the humility of a Cruz or Trump:
I sense.a lot of vanity in Ryan. He’s probably fooling around, too
Secret Agent Man remembers Ryan worked with the hated Romney!
Fuch paul ryan.

I am done with him. Fricking romney ass kissing clone.
Amusingly, DannyTN laments that Ryan tried to cut social security and Medicare.
Ryan’s whole attitude on the budget was wrong.

He was determined to cut the budget until it was balanced, when the problem is that the economy is in the doldrums and there are way too many people unemployed.

Fix the economy and you don’t have to go after the commitments we’ve made in social security and Medicare.
Ohhhh, fix the economy. Why didn't I think of that??

griswold3 wants a speaker more willing to disrespect Obama and look like a loon:
Sorry, but when Obama put Ryan in the front row of his budget speech, bitch slapped him and Ryan did not respond, that shows lack of leadership. He Shoulda turned the tables on the Chump in Chief full bore!
ncalburt - "Paul La Raza Ryan"
Ryan may be worse.

That Paul La Raza Ryan is a Huge Liar mocked everyone who stated that TPP was a cheap foreign labor Scheme.
As it turns out TPP is a cheap foreign labor scheme.

Ryan needs to be tar and feathered and drag thru Potomac .

He is fully owned by Adelson , the Las Vegas cheap labor Lib billionaire !
bestintxas only trusts Southerners:
NO MORE NORTHERNERS FOR SPEAKER.

Have enough of Hasterts and Boehners.
RushIsMyTeddyBear has the Freeper consensus, along with Allen West:
Bring back Newt.
But leave it to Yosemitest to be crazier than your average Freeper:
Time for a Louie Gohmert takeover !
Is EternalVigilance the latest to go nihilist?
The red pill, the blue pill...it don’t matter much. Same poison in all of ‘em.
Boehner's going to stay on until a choice is made. lapsus calami will not have that!
Vacate the Chair and force a vote.

DITTO - begone Corrupt Crying Cheeto - stop gumming up the works, bedeviling our system. That needs to be the next task for the House - get that bum out, NOW
And so the Freeper types' latest victory has damaged the GOP, and lead only to more targets for their anti GOP rage. With friends like these...Hehe.

Poor Kevin McCarthy

I may be the only one, but I have some hope for the new speaker candidate. He may not be a legislative eagle, but he seems to be really good at forming a personal rapport with people. And he recruited a lot of the Freedom Caucus tea party folks. Such ego-stroking may be just what the Freedom Caucus needs to be a bit flexible. Of course, one the other side, it looks like the Freedom Caucus folks are going to refuse to give him the 218 he needs to become speaker.

So I think his odds are higher than anyone else in the house, but I think he's still screwed. Especially given how he accidentally noted that the Benghazi Committee's main accomplishment to date has been throwing a bunch of unsubstantiated mud at Hillary.

Freepers eagerly condemn the new heretic.

oldbrowser explains that the real purpose of the Benghazi committee is to show the truth about that evil, evil Hillary:
“The core Republican goal in establishing the Benghazi committee was always to damage Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign and never to conduct an evenhanded search for the facts.”

That and the idle curiosity about how and why four Americans including an ambassador were slaughtered like animals while our government watched.
Chgogal wishes McCarthy would have completely thrown any patina of objectivity aside and begun a frothing rage against Hillary. That woulda worked!
If I was McCarthy I would have double down.

“Damn right this is political. This is DC. Hillary got the Ambassador, a State Department staffer and two Navy SEALs killed. She lied about a video starting the terrorist attack, she and Obama arrested and jailed the video maker, she used an unsecured server, she emailed classified material over the unsecured server and she illegally deleted emails instead of turning the emails over to the State Department. Now this incompetent woman wants to be POTUS. Are you kidding me? The Republican Party is trying to save this country from the most inept, incompetent former Secretary of State to ever soil the threshold of the Department of State. And you can quote me on this.”

Now Hillary, Obama, Pelosi and Ried may not like the truth, but dammit, the families of the slain deserve to know the truth. The families deserve to know where Hillary and Obama were the night of 9/11/12. The families deserve to know why Obama did not lift a finger to rescue them or even attempt to rescue them. The American people deserve to know how truly inept and incompetent Hillary and Obama are. They deserve the truth. The Benghazi Select Committee is getting to the bottom of this tragic 9/11 event. If Truth is Political than so be it.”

Unfortunately, the weenie did not double down,
DannyTN wonders if McCarthy is actually working for Hillary:
Did McCarthy tell the truth? Or is he trying to help Hillary since it is clear none of the GOPe candidates will win?
John 3_19-21 is sure the Benghazi truth is gonna come out real soon...
My gut tells me Gowdy is getting to close to the truth. This smells of a kill the committee action to me.

First; rumours of Gowdy retiring next year, then McCarthy "fumbles" the ball on the one yard line.

Me thinks Gowdy is being warned to STFU.
newfreep weakly attacks the article's author:
EJD is THE MOST insanely stupid journolista...and that’s saying something.
huldah1776 just piles up the conspiracy theories:
Well, then bring down the White Hut by finding out about what really happened with Extortion 17. Did Hillary’s e-mails and server give their mission away?
Rome2000 takes issue with McCarthy's often...offbeat vocabulary:
untrustable?

Does not compute.

Eff you McCarthy, YOU SLIMY DOUCHEBAG

WASHINGTONIANS RAUS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Rome2000 again, because no one captures Freepers' rage like he can:
Hey SEAN HANNITY.

You are AFRAID to fight the RNC and declare that DOUCHEBAG MCCARTHY UNFIT TO BE SPEAKER.

Don’t you have enough cash?

Stop being a pussy.

Wednesday, October 7, 2015

Freepers versus Doctors Without Borders

Via Anonymous.

Doctors Without Borders is actually my charity of choice. They aren't particularly partisan, though they will release statements condemning Israel for bombing Palestine and whatnot.

Recently, the Afghanistan government requested the US bomb a Doctors Without Borders hospital. The reasoning is muddy, but just about everyone agrees this was a bad thing.

Except for Freepers and the fringes of the right-wing Blogosphere. Thus, you have Daniel Greenfield, noted for publishing every anti-Islam hoax there is, with the preemptive doubling down: "It's Time to Treat Doctors Without Borders as a Terrorist Organization."

Freepers are eager to hate anyone who might not be into Muslims dying, so they reflexively start up the delusion machine, heedless of how untenable this might be in the real world.

HiTech RedNeck isn't sure how high to crank his crazy:
Are they just being generic leftists or something even worse?
CodeToad has totally met real life people:
The ONLY DWB types I have ever met have been extreme left-wing liberals. They often are anti-Americans and think our country caused all the “suffering” they go overseas to treat.
faithhopecharity explains that doctors are cool, but bad guys are not cool:
we all love and respect doctors! but doctors who work for murdering terrorists (propagandizing for them!!!) are NOT the nice medics who help keep your mama alive........ these are enemy agents working for our enemies
faithhopecharity soon devolves into frothing about Nazis! Nazis everywhere!!
they are either bought off by all that IslamoNazi money...like half of Congress... and of course like the current Occupancy in our WH....(tho he probably didn’t need to be bought off, he came that way I think)

but yes, the DWB has turned into a Nazi outfit, no matter how much good they may do they are working at murdering millions of innocent people with their sick Nazi propaganda too

we need bigger prisons or...
Uh, oh. theoilpainter ay have met some real life Doctors Without Borders people...
I have never seen/heard these claims. I know a few associated with this organization and they are Republicans and very religious Christians. Is there more than one organization with this name? Are we being critical now because they are now calling our government liars?
He's ignored, of course.

jimbug has been reading all the anti-Islam sites, and is pretty happy to find a new outrage:
I have chosen to educate myself on radical Islam since 9/11, and thought I was reasonably well informed, but your post took me totally by surprise.
Capt. Tom is confused that no one is touting the targeting of injured Taliban:
One thing that puzzles me is that we give the statisics of the bombing as 10 patients killed, plus 12 medical personel killed, but I don't see any body count for the alleged Taliban who were targeted at that hospital. -Tom
puppypusher doesn't get why the Pentagon doesn't want to release the video of them bombing a hospital, just to clear thing sup:
Why doesn’t the Pentagon release the video of the attack so that we can determine if the aircraft were being fired on at that hospital?If the Dwob’s group knew these terrorist were firing weapons at our aircraft from their grounds than the liability is on them.
MarvinStinson is not a fan of the Novel Peace Prize:
And WHO ELSE has won the Novel PEACE prize?

Jew Killer Arafart.

Obama.
MarMema is amazed by circular logic:
The left instinctively sides with evil.

They do. It never ceases to amaze me. They do.
caww knows the right has moved on from hating liberals to a GOP purity crusade:
....”The left instinctively sides with evil”.....

It would appear many on the right anymore are doing likewise.....seems what’s termed wrong and right...good and evil... no longer have any distinctions.

Shutdown pouting

Boehner's departure means he had nothing keeping him from getting Dems on board to avoid a shutdown that would probably not have gone well for the GOP. We'll see in December, though Boehner may have other 'FUTP' plans this month - he's rumored to be talking about a 2 year budget, which would put a shutdown thread beyond the 2016 election.

Freepers are already caterwauling at their party once again giving in to political reality. So the polls say even Republicans were against a shutdown over Planned Parenthood? Freepers got a spleen, and they gotta vent it, consequences bedamned!

pgkdan thinks America just isn't angry enough:
The country has lost it’s moral compass and it’s ability to be outraged...
norwaypinesavage is sure the shutdown over PP would be blamed on Obama by more than Sean Hannity:
This says to me that we have a winning issue here. If Obama were to shut down the government over PP funding, two thirds of the country would disapprove. The issue is not strategy, it’s messaging. When done properly, we win.
llmc1 wants the real facts to come out:
I’m curious what percentage of Americans actually know the truth about Planned Parenthood.
Buckeye McFrog is pretty sure that the reason his daughter isn't super outraged about abortion is Nazi-esque propaganda:
My millennial daughter, who consumes nearly all of her news via social media, not only had not seen the videos, she DID NOT EVEN KNOW THIS WAS A STORY until I told her.

Joseph Goebbels got nothing on Facebook and Yahoo.
mythenjoseph is sure laws were broken, and if they aren't he'll call everyone cunts until they are!
The simple fact that selling aborted fetuses is illegal doesn’t even prompt any prosecutions....nothing is illegal apparently when you are shuffling the trillions around and are an exempted from law as these C__t’s think they are. Souless animals....THIS IS WHY I pay NO taxes anywhere except for point of sale IF I even purchase from a store....I truly despise these F’kin animals in washington.
Maris Crane just unskews the polls in her head:
I don’t believe this.

How was the question asked? And when they tell us that...
I still will not believe this.

This country is pro-life.
fruser1 is sure that the key to shutdown success is to be even more stubborn this time:
They still should shut it down over commie care.

Run it though with one of those 50% majority votes for spending measures - the same way commie care was passed.

When O vetoes, kick back and let the shutdown actually occur, except this time, let the dems cave first.
ActresponsiblyinVA is pretty sure the last shutdown was awesome for the GOP:
The media does not want a shutdown, After the 2013 shutdown the Republicans increased their majority in the house, took over the senate and substantially increased their representation in state and local governments. Why should the current leaders want to do it again?
marron reiterates that a government shutdown isn't really a thing, and has a pretty neat analogy to back it up:
When the government “shuts down”, nothing really shuts down. So saying people don’t want a shutdown when nothing really shuts down is just dimwitted.

They are turning government into a talisman, into a cargo cult. Aztecs had to sacrifice virgins to keep the sun coming up. Americans slaughter babies and don’t dare stop lest the White House tour guides be furloughed with back pay.
dp0622 is amazed conservatives are even a thing, with the media being so universally liberal:
Plus conservatives own almost NO major media so like the article said, the majority of people haven’t even seen or heard about the video. Nor do they know that NO PP clinics have mammograms. I didn’t know that until this article.

It’s amazing we win any elections with almost the entire press against us.
mbarker12474 wants to shut down the AP, somehow...
The Media. The Media. The Media.

Topple the Associated Press and things will change. Until then, bitching about Obama, Congress, Boehner, etc., is a waste of time.

Middle America’s worldview is that of the AP. Replace the AP.
TexasFreeper2009 takes the idea that a shutdown is needed as the only check on Obama to it's logical extreme:
Obama should threaten to shut the government down if congress doens’t pass a law forcing Trump to personally drive buses of illegal across the border. Or how about 100 billion being transfered to the Hillary for president campaign or he shuts the government down?

Why not? what’s to stop him? The RINO’s have already said they wont shut the government down no matter what, so why not just start asking for bat shit crazy stuff ?
Yeah, why hasn't Obama gone full Bond villain yet???

Tuesday, October 6, 2015

Magical tax cuts

Some time ago, there was this Republican idea of 'starve the beast,' wherein tax cuts reduce the money for government spending. And in a way, it worked - the deficit raised so much that the idea of sequestration has been more or less publicly accepted.

But in the meantime, the starve the beast idea has been replaced by a simple conviction that tax cuts not only pay for themselves, but are the cure for all society's ills, just like mass deportations and ending welfare.

Thus, when Trumps supposedly revenue neutral tax plan is scored as raising the annual deficit to $12 trillion after 10 years, Freepers abandon any sense of concern about the deficit, and declare that because they get a tax cut, it must be awesome.

edpc has a rather one-sided understanding of things:
Taxes don’t raise deficits. Spending does.
grania knows something must be done, and this is something...:
This is comical. The pundits wanted a plan, so Trump put together specialists and came up with a plan. And, surprise! The naysayers say it can't be done.

Of course it can. Cut back on Common Core and other worse-than-garbage federal programs, send home invaders and fill those jobs with US citizens, bring jobs back home and tax stuff from countries that manipulate money. Is there any chance the pundits factored all that in?
Zenjitsuman remembers how Reagan only cut taxes, and didn't raise spending at all:
JFK and Reagan both successfully cut taxes and raised revenues, got people working again.

The critics don’t know squat
Viennacon knows Trump's plan includes secret radical changes:
What a load of BS. It assumes current spending levels. Something tells me EPA will not exist under a Trump admin
NTHockey managed pay for 20% of Trump's plan by destroying the government, and then invokes anti-illegals to get us to 70%. etc. takes care of the rest:
They got some serious spending cuts to make. Let’s see, eliminate Departments of Energy, Education, Labor, Commerce, HHS, HUD, etc.

Not spending is a spending cut. Doing the above cuts $2 trillion. Eliminate DeathCare and welfare for illegals another $5 trillion. Etc., etc., etc.
jneesy sees the real savings:
one thing i haven’t heard mentioned about his tax plan is how much will be cut out of the irs budget due to its simplistic nature
oldvirginian doesn't know jack, but doesn't trust the media when they disagree with him:
I call chicken manure!

I don’t know jack about economics, but I know these are the same people who take *years* to figure out that Obamacare won’t be such a bad thing.
How in the name of sanity can they nitpick Trump’s tax plan in a couple of days?
They can’t.
They aren’t competent enough to add 2+2 and get an answer of 4!
stig does the math to find that Trump raises his personal deficit by almost 10k per year. And then decides he doesn't care:
We currently have an 18 trillion deficit. Forbes reports there were 85 million tax returns in 2010 that paid taxes. Now that includes married people filing jointly and they estimate that taking that into account means there are probably 122 million people who pay taxes. So doing the math to cover the 18 trillion we each owe:

$147,541.00

To cover their estimate of Trump's 1.2 trillion per year will add:

$9836.00 per year.

So note to pundits I'm willing to risk the extra 10 grand per year to see if Trump can grow the economy and cut the budget. Besides I don't have the 150 grand anyway so what's another 80k over a Trump 8 year presidency?
Tucker39 explains that only GOP Administrations create jobs:
This talking point that the “government doesn’t create jobs” is as tiring and false as the “America isn’t a Democracy, it’s a republic” talking point. In reality, the government can do a lot to create jobs and economic prosperity.

Well, they haven’t created any, except government bureaucrat jobs, in the last 7 years. They haven’t because they can’t. They only thing the government produces is paper money. And the more they print, the less value it has.
G Larry knows if you don't assume Trump's plan is magic, you must be a liberal:
Trumps plan generates more revenue.

Therefore, if you insist there will be higher deficits, you must be planning on higher spending.