Wednesday, November 24, 2010

Sitting Bull: Terrorists

Obama writes a children's book about people he admires. Freepers, ever looking for flaws, fasten on his praise of Sitting Bull as praise of a terrorist.

USALiberty
WOW! Now the Kenyan Usurper is openly praising terrorists? He is not even PRETENDING to be a loyal American anymore! We need to make sure this anti-American book NEVER gets into the schools.
nmh

Obama will praise anyone that KILLS, TERRORIZES or MAIMS Americans because HE HATES patriotic AMERICANS!

jiminycricket000 sounds exactly like the conquistadors:
These Indians were trecherous people, with no guiding principles to reign in their human instincts. And they were heartless butchers, routinely slaughtering women and children, asking for everything they recieved in return. They were not one iota different than the Roman Empire barbarians or the women and baby sacrificing Aztecs, both of whom were too base a people to build a real civilization.
Happy Rain has decided might makes right:
Until anyone can accurately claim original ownership by one's group of ANY piece of land anywhere on earth (the Indians in say-Arkansas-weren't the FIRST Indians there) then those who WEREN”T GOOD ENOUGH TO HOLD ON TO THEIR PROPERTY should quit bitchin’ and just try to get good enough for next time.
Sherman Logan wished we'd completed our genocide:

For an alternative where "kill them all" was the norm, may I refer you to the history of Argentine, which was fighting its last Indian wars at the same time we were.

Argentina has no Indian problem because it has no Indians. They killed them all.

OTOH, it was indeed routine for American Indians to kill white (and enemy Indian) women and children, often by torturing them to death.
Psalm 144 has a bit of a twist

Custer was the damned terrorist.

Sitting Bull, Crazy Horse et alia were Red State Americans clinging to their guns and religion and antipathy to people who weren’t like them, who incidentally were also trying to kill them, their wives and their children. The defenders at the Little Bighorn understood the nature of the federal government and its benevolent intent early on.

The important thing is that one side in every conflict be a terrorist, so Freepers can give their hate historical weight.

2 comments:

  1. Hey Ozy,
    Not might makes right, more like white makes right in Freeper world. Your work is amazing.

    ReplyDelete
  2. (Freeper logic)
    Hitler's worst crime was that by trying to exterminate God's chosen people in the name of socialism, he gave the noble act of genocide a bad name. Because of Hitler, the UN one-world-government liberals were able to foist the Genocide Convention on the world. The modern age has forgotten the basic biblical truth that, like the Amalekites in the Old Testament, some races are intrinsically evil and deserve only to be slaughtered to the last man, woman and child.

    ReplyDelete