Thursday, August 22, 2013

Attorney General Eric Holder: Jail time for blacks is too long

It is well known that blacks get harsher criminal penalties compared with identical offenses for whites. I mean, there was a law suit about it in the 1970s that went to the Supreme Court.

But Freepers, continuing their convergance with stormfront, and cementing their irrelevance, go with the "massive coverup of black crime" angle.

cherry wants blacks in prison forever:
holder can come clean and tell the citizens the stats on black crime....how unbelievably violent blacks are and how they account for a huge percentage of crime considering their minority status...

build more prisons...put them...the criminals....away for longer times...
Secret Agent Man has nothing but disgust for people who understand statistics:
We have overt open racists running DOJ and the White House.

Eric damn well knows that most blacks get longer sentences because they commit far more violent crimes and they are very often repeat offenders to violent crimes.

These sentences don’t just appear out of thin air. They actually take into account specifics of each case. They have actual trials, and the history of the defendant is known.

What a damn racist this man is. Blatant racist. More blacks commit crimes than whites for the size of their demographic group, that’s why a disproportionate number are in jail. They also are far more prone to commit violent crime, which carries longer sentences.

This man is an utter joke. An embarrassment to the country and the concept we’re all supposed to be treated equally.

Racist idiot.
SeminoleCounty knows what Holder means:
CodeWords for: Whitey needs to stay in jail longer

These Black Ku Klux Klan Racists refuse to take responsibility for Blacks acting like feral animals. Holder would rather lynch a George Zimmermann than prevent a future Trayvon Martin
mrsmel is just frantic about all the evil blacks she hears about on the Internets:
He’s already given the signal, loud and clear, that blacks will not be called out for the recent spate (at least two years) of black wildings, knock-out king, polar bear hunting, “Beat Whitey Night”, black on white crime (which is exponentially one-sided, especially rape and sexual assaults).



This, combined with the all-out efforts to disarm law-abiding gun owners (which recent surveys show to be heavily majority white-note the operative words “law abiding”) tells me everything I need to know about what Hussein, Holder & Co are up to-they are promoting black attacks on whites until one white person finally fires upon one of the thugs in self-defense or defense of an innocent white or non-black victim, and then I have a feeling we’ll know for a certainty why DHS has been stockpiling weapons and ammo, police depts are being weakened through downsizing, being spread too thin,and PC, and the military is being undermined through the same means.
Bon mots knows how Obama thinks:
Free Obama's Sons!
They only kill little whiteycracker babies anyway...
SaraJohnson sees this racism at work in schools and airport security:
Zero tolerance public school policy came from leftists race baiting school punishment. Baiters claimed more black boys were suspended or expelled than white boys from public schools. School boards did not want to be named guilty of racism by virtue of quota statistics (an absolute false premise) they decided widen the pool of punishable behavior. Hence, a gang banger with a gun at school gets expelled just like the white boy who drew a picture of a battle with guns or shot someone with his finger. The attacker in the fight is suspended as along with the victim.

You can see the same mentality working at DHS where Christians are named terrorists like Islamists and everyone at the airport gets sexually molested, even a child in a wheelchair or a blue haired granny. They will stick their filthy hands all over people whether they surgical wounds or not. They did not want to be “unfair” and only check jihadists at the gates. In fact, DHS gave Saudi travelers special fast clearance. (the 911 bombers were Saudis) So they make perfectly innocent people guilty and perfectly guilty people innocent, in equality. Injustice makes leftists all fuzzy inside.
Heh. "Baiters."

varyouga lays out Obama's martial law plan:
Step 1: Whitey shoots one or more of Obama's sons during a "wilding" incident. Media fans the flames.

Step 2: Race riots start. Martial law is soon declared for most of the US population. Economy grinds to a halt.

Step 3: Systematic disarming of the US with backscatter vans and drones begins. "We must temporarily abandon freedom to save freedom."

37 comments:

  1. wilding

    In the real world, it's a phony term falsely attributed by the NYPD to a handful of black kids who were coerced into confessing to a rape committed by someone else. Apparently, the cops misheard a reference to Tone-Loc's "Wild Thing" as "wilding."

    In FReeperville, it's just what young black males do; they know 'cause they heard all about it from the "liberal media," which spent a lot more time drumming up hysteria about "wilding" than it spent explaining the actual origin of the term; or the arrest and conviction of the actual rapist; or the falsely accused black kids' subsequent, ongoing lawsuit against NYC.

    All of which just goes to show that blacks are the real racists, right?

    ReplyDelete
  2. At risk of being labeled a freeper troll,
    I basically have to agree with them.
    Every one of those studies that claimed blacks got "harsher" sentences for "equal" crimes, purpously equated unequal circumstances, unequal prior convictions, and unequal levels of violence inflicted on the victim(s).

    If it really us such a problem, then go with longer sentences for whites.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's not a color issue, it's a socioeconomic status issue. Minorities are disproportionately represented in low income areas. That's the root of the problem.

      Delete
    2. First, you have been courteous and willing to accept people disagreeing with your assertions - you would make an awful Freeper.

      The studies I've seen do their best to address unequal circumstances and to eliminate them statistically.

      Delete
  3. How many times are Freepers going to incorrectly predict Martial Law? It's always step 2 in their wild fantasies leading to overthrowing Obama. I can't figure out if they're scared of it or disappointed that it hasn't happened yet.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And when are they going to learn how to spell "martial"? Pointing it out never seems to help, because they have no learning curve anyway.

      Delete
  4. I predict a reply along the lines of "woozle wuzzle?"

    ReplyDelete
  5. Not necessarily ...
    there is the theory of "white privilege", in that ALL whites should be considered "racist", regardless of any evidence to the contrary.

    The blacks that buy into the white privilege theory, can therefore excuse any anti-white atrocity as "deserved" by the white victim.

    This is especially true in the common 5-on-1, 10-on-1, 20-on-1 black racist "beat downs", where the white victim is dehumanized as a mere symbol of "white privilege".

    ReplyDelete
  6. Yeah ... those beat downs.
    when black-on-black, there is usually some tangible, even if ridiculous, reason.

    Black-on-white ... no reason other than black racism, get ANYONE who is white or asian or hispanic. Random violence.
    This is what often drives a common black-on-white robbery into a violent homicide.

    The poster above who claims he was mugged by a black guy once, and robbed by a black woman once, should consider himself fortunate. If the mugging was 2-on-1 or 3-on-1, or more, the chances of black racist violence go up exponentially.

    And yes, they DO happen "much at all" ... all the time, every day.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Convenient. There is some speculative reason for all the times the victim is black, but not when he's white - then it's racism and only racism.
    I'd imagine that it's white on black then it's probably also for some non-racial reason.

    You seem an expert on black violent behavior and motivation, but somehow I suspect your more making crap up.
    All the time, every day? Not even Drudge's dedicated cherry-picking turns up that kind of frequency.
    You're internet arguing - making outlandish unsupported assertions to prove your conclusion. Alas, you convince only yourself.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The non-stop racism on FR is depressing. Cheer up by watching Freepers fight about the metric system.

    ReplyDelete
  9. And you are playing a little game of la-la-land make believe ... there IS a racial violence problem in America, and the violence is overwhelmingly black-on-white.

    Pretend all you want, Ozy, eventually, and unfortunately, reality will hit home someday.

    ReplyDelete
  10. You know, saying that we're "playing a little game of la-la-land make believe" isn't the same thing as producing hard evidence. It only serves to beclown yourself. So either produce the evidence or admit you were wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Reread Ozy's post (and others above) and present your own "hard evidence" backing up their claims.

    You obviously have preconceived notions about black racial violence (or lack thereof) yourself, and are thus "beclowning" yourself.

    Say a little prayer of thanksgiving tonight before you go to bed, that "reality" hasn't come to you and yours in the worst way possible.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I live in East Oakland. 20 on 1 beatdowns don't happen here, to white or black people.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Yes I do, in my fancy mansion in the East Oakland hills. I doubt there's even 20 black people within 5 miles from here.

    ReplyDelete
  14. You caught me. I lied about living in Oakland.

    Not really. No one has ever done that, ever.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Sure Ozy and euphgeek, I'll play.

    Let's look at four recent black-on-white crimes :
    Brunswick, GA
    St. Paul, MN
    Spokane, WA
    Duncan, OK
    (look them up yourself, la la landers).

    I defy you to find four white-on-black crimes in the last ten years that match these crimes for the heinousness and cruelty and callousness shown by the black perpetrators.

    In fact, I'll give you one.
    The James Byrd dragging death, even though that was 15 years ago.

    Three more Ozy and euphgeek, just three more.
    They don't even have to be "racist", just match the level of inhuman cruelty.

    ReplyDelete
  16. No, see, you don't get to make wild claims and then tell us to prove otherwise. It just doesn't work that way. I notice you found four so far (I guess, anyway. You just named cities, no dates or anything, but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.). Nothing that indicates your original claim of it happening "all the time, every day". We're still waiting for that evidence.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Thank you for demonstrating Ozy's point for him.

    ReplyDelete
  18. "Yeah...those beat downs? They don't happen much at all. And they happen to blacks a lot more than whites."

    Right, because this didn't happen, right motherfucker ?

    http://www.examiner.com/article/school-bus-fight-three-black-teens-attack-white-bus-driver-doesn-t-intervene


    ReplyDelete
  19. Obviously you missed the word "much" in that sentence, genius.

    ReplyDelete
  20. He's a dumbass Ozzy. I'm sure he's "not racist" just "concerned".

    FYI, the "East Oakland hills" are within 5 miles of the most crime ridden part of East Oakland. Plenty of rich black people live in the hills and plenty of poor white people live down below.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I guess for euphgeek, as long as it doesn't happen "every day", it isn't black racism.
    If it only happens every other day, or every week, or even every month, that is a good thing and white people should just shut up and take their homicidal beatings.

    And yeah it DOES work that way ... provide evidence that black violence is not an issue or a problem. Provide evidence that it is "no big deal and doesn't happen much".

    Really, how much for you would be too much ?
    Once a year ? Twice a year ? Or do you have no limit that would knock you off of your oh-so-righteous non-racist white pedastal ?

    ReplyDelete
  22. No, see, you're the one who said every day. Now that you've been shown for the absolute clown you are, you're furiously backpedaling in a vain effort to try to turn it back on me again. So I guess that means you admit you were wrong.

    And by the way, I live in a neighborhood in a big city where a large percentage of the residents are black. My wife and I go for walks all the time, and frequently come in contact with black teens. We have never had so much as one incident in the 10+ years we have lived here.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Forget it, he's rolling.

    He knows more about where we live than we ever will. He has the psychic ability to know what entire races are thinking at all times. Meth is a hell of a drug.

    ReplyDelete
  24. OK euphgeek, your anecdote must mean that all those other incidents never happened, they must all be made up because YOU never had a problem.

    So really, what's your point ?
    Racial problems in America are so minor that they need never be mentioned ?
    The issue just needs to be covered up and never discussed ?

    You are the only one here avoiding any discussion of the issue. I'm beginning to see why The Comedian considers you to be such a condescending asswipe.

    And a liar. You and your wife don't go traipsing around your "big city" any time of the day or night without a care in the world.
    Even you aren't that stupid.

    ReplyDelete
  25. "Meth is a hell of a drug"

    You would know, princess.
    Pretty much everyone in east Oakland is addicted to it.

    ReplyDelete
  26. "So really, what's your point ?
    Racial problems in America are so minor that they need never be mentioned ?
    The issue just needs to be covered up and never discussed ?"

    Sorry Anon - had to quote you since we share a handle.

    Discuss is good. Like lancing a boil, it lets the crap out and at least the chance to start healing. I do long for the day we get Martin Luther King's dream - where people are judged solely on their character, not on their skin or religion.
    Actually doing something about it would be better. The question is - "What?" Everyone knows there is a problem. There is violence in the inner cities, which creates more violence. Damn few teachers want to work there, which reduces the chance of a decent education, or even getting that one teacher that inspires you and makes a difference to your life. Family life seems to have fallen apart and no one knows how to fix it. Jobs - well, they aren't really there any more. The places are falling apart because no one cares.

    The problems are easy to find. Fixing them? We need a Solomon.

    Shalom.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Hey, Anon, why don't you stop trying to put words in my mouth? It's not helping your case and is just making you look sillier and sillier. If you would like to discuss the issue like an adult, that's one thing. But stop lying about what I said just because your assertions about gangs of blacks beating down whites happening "all the time, every day" turned out to be false.

    And by the way, yes we have actually gone for walks after dark in my neighborhood. I've even gone alone after midnight. But I guess you know better than I do what my own neighborhood is like, right?

    ReplyDelete
  28. Of course not, this blog shows both ends of the spectrum, was just trying to say no one likes sweeping generalizations

    ReplyDelete
  29. Actually I do know what your neighborhood is like ...
    a little all white upper middle class enclave.

    Now, if you were taking your oh-so-liberal non-racist walks after midnight around east Baltimore, around Compton, around the Libertyville section of Miami, I'd be impressed ...
    but, as I said before, even you and your fat wife aren't that stupid.
    Yes, not only do I know where you live, I know your wife too ... what a porker !

    ReplyDelete
  30. Don't waste your talents here man! Quick, play the lottery! Go to Vegas!

    A man with your abilities should take advantage of them.

    ReplyDelete
  31. It's cool, and pretty much my point. Just feels like sometimes wading through a sea of crap to find the odd sane comment. It isn't, of course. There are a lot of decent enough people over on FR, they just get drowned out by the retards and hateful ones.

    Yet most folk - left or right - are not like that at all.

    ReplyDelete
  32. I think most of the decent lurkers at FR have just given up. Just take a look at how long it takes blatantly racist and violent to be reported. Also the fact that some remain standing leads me to believe that the views being sprouted are becoming the group norm. Also why they hell hasn't Jim Robinson made a post denouncing all the crap that is going on over there?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A lot of them have. Maybe not the lurkers, but the more reasonable posters have mostly left for other sites, where hate and out and out racism are not tolerated.

      Know I will continue to visit FR as long as Salvation does the daily reading posts, but even she seems to be getting discouraged now and not getting involved in discussions like she used to.

      Delete