Tapdancing

I caught the Maddow-Rand Paul interview, which was all about Rand Paul not saying whether he supports the private portion of the Civil Rights act of 1964 or not. I get the libertarian argument, Rand, so get some balls and say it!

Anyhow, Freepers' reaction, when torn between their ideals (support their latest fave) or political expediency is to split the baby and blame the messenger:

roses of sharon actually attacks Rand Paul himself AND the messenger:

A Paul grovels on The Kenyan’s State TV (Maddow)?

Shocker, lol!

Who cares about what was said, MSNBC is African!

Theophilus thinks this is no big deal:

• Viewer of MSNBC - Rare
• KY Viewer of MSNBC - Endangered
• Rural KY Democrat or Independant Viewer of MSNBC - Better luck finding an ivory billed woodpecker.

Well, I suppose FOX may not report this.

RogerQ actually engages:

Rand Paul is absolutely right. The government has no right to limit anyone’s property and free speech rights in the name of so-called civil rights.

It starts out almost coherent (though wrong). Till the "so-called" ya stuck on the end of civil rights.

Ammo Republic 15 comes out and says it:

If anyone wants to find out what happened to this nation and how it has been destroyed you need look no further than the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the 1965 Immigration Act.

The seed of destruction were planted with both pieces of legislation.

The best part isn't that he's going further than Rand to basically argue for Jim Crow and possibly white supremacy. The best part is the lack of support, like it's self-evident.

DwFry agrees:

Amen!...but speaking such truths will get you blacklisted from almost any group.

Sad time to be a supporter of freedom.

Sad indeed!