Tuesday, June 14, 2011

First, pound on the table.

"When the facts are against you, argue the law; when the law is against you, argue the law; when both the facts and the law are against you, pound on the table"

Janet Napolitano points out that profiling terrorists makes you blind to other demographics. Freepers basically refuse to engage, going straight to pounding on the table.

I'm talking complete lack of argumentation. Not in their usual alternate reality marshaling of bad evidence but in the "shut up and fuck you" total lack of argument. Usually this is how folks react when they have no argument, but Freepers are used to that. In this case, I think this is what they do when they feel like the country is actually with them.

ari-freedom thinks only examining Muslims can only end well:

Napolitano: Concentrating Terrorists Screening Efforts on Muslim Men Under 35 is Not Good Logic

I agree. We should also look at muslim women and men over 35.

AlanGreenSpam thinks this statement is proof of zombie she-maledom.

Wow, this is depressing to have such a cowardly she-male in charge of our security.

She’s so brainwashed about political correctness that she’s no longer intelligent or logical.

Watching her is like watching a brainwashed zombie. I’m serious.

hope is pretty sure abortion is somehow involved:
The elite program of these are extremely evil, beyond Marxism, and Communism. They want a world that supports their philosophy.

They are the modern Margaret Sangers!
Jack Hammer manages to marshal an argument:

Janet, you simple tool - Israel has used the very method for decades to keep the peace on El Al, with a success record that is the envy of every nation on Earth.

Not good logic?????

Tell it to the Israelis, you simple-minded twit.

Yeah, cause Israel's time-intensive expert program is totally scalable, ya twit!

takenoprisoner is pretty sure this is sexy times:
She would rather molest our children, wives, and mothers, than go after the culprits. What does that tell you? It speaks volumes for me. She’s not on our side of this war. She enjoys watching our relatives being molested. She prolly downloads airport cam clips of molestations to take home at night, for further review.
Vigilanteman also sees sexy times:

Was it just my dirty mind, or did anyone else notice that Big Sis was holding the mike like it was a personal vibrator?

jonascord imagines further sexy times:

She gets all quivery and damp at the thought of being able to do tha OTHER thing Che liked, using a .45 to blow the right wing brains of non-Marxists all over his/her/it's shoes.

When this is all over, we're going to have to establish war crimes tribunals like Nuremberg for these criminal traitors...
Well, this got oddly creepy. I suppose Freepers don't exactly pound on the table...

2 comments:

  1. Yes,
    We should not profile. We should search Buddhist Monks, little grannies and Methodists. Yup makes perfect sense /s.

    We should profile all citizens of countries with terror links. But no, that would be raaaaacist.

    Is that a good enough argument?

    ReplyDelete
  2. It's not the racism, it's that terrorists can come from anywhere. If we play whack-a-mole with terror-linked countries, AQ can pretty easily switch it up and catch us unawares.

    Random searches are better since the bad guys cannot compensate.

    Secret profiling is even better.

    ReplyDelete